Your vestimentary style ?

**Tyrlop** · Subject: Re: Your vestimentary style ? Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:07 pm

Black_Cross wrote:

Liche wrote:

lol, Im still trying to understand why you use Reactionary as an insult.

Well, what do you see as positive about being reactionary?

what is a reactionary Question

**Black_Cross** · Subject: Re: Your vestimentary style ? Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:43 pm

Tyrlop wrote:

Black_Cross wrote:

Liche wrote:

lol, Im still trying to understand why you use Reactionary as an insult.

Well, what do you see as positive about being reactionary?

what is a reactionary Question

Fighting against progressive change. Most people aren't reactionary (like the authoritarian lefties might tell ya), so much as they spew reactionary rhetoric. It's endemic in the culture most everywhere, except for any tribal culture, or village communities.

_________________
"A market economy must comprise all elements of industry including labor, land and money [...] But labor and land are no other than the human beings themselves of which every society consists and the natural surroundings in which it exists. To include them in the market mechanism means to subordinate the substance of society itself."
--Karl Polanyi--

Guest

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

that only creates newer markets.

not if you dont buy anything related to clothes.

lets be honest, you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.

**Tyrlop** · Subject: Re: Your vestimentary style ? Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:17 pm

beatnikzach wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

that only creates newer markets.

not if you dont buy anything related to clothes.

lets be honest, you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.

yes i do. i wish i could say tl.dr

Guest

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

that only creates newer markets.

not if you dont buy anything related to clothes.

lets be honest, you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.

yes i do. i wish i could say tl.dr

fucking prove it then.

according to your "theory" procuring only clothing supports the market; ergo supports capitalism.
i think that apple is a little bit more evil then champion.
i will agree with the sentiment that buying things supports the market, but seriously lets be fucking realistic, will a boycott work when only leftists do it?
no because then again, they will create new markets and new products made just for the leftists.
the domestic made and the environmentally sound garbage.

its like kashi and kellogg.
kashi started as a good, healthy, natural, vegan, cereal brand, now look who owns the?

i agree with not supporting monopolies and not buying shit like ipods and such, but clothing?
get real.

**Tyrlop** · Subject: Re: Your vestimentary style ? Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:48 pm

beatnikzach wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

that only creates newer markets.

not if you dont buy anything related to clothes.

lets be honest, you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.

yes i do. i wish i could say tl.dr

fucking prove it then.

according to your "theory" procuring only clothing supports the market; ergo supports capitalism.
i think that apple is a little bit more evil then champion.
i will agree with the sentiment that buying things supports the market, but seriously lets be fucking realistic, will a boycott work when only leftists do it?
no because then again, they will create new markets and new products made just for the leftists.
the domestic made and the environmentally sound garbage.

its like kashi and kellogg.
kashi started as a good, healthy, natural, vegan, cereal brand, now look who owns the?

i agree with not supporting monopolies and not buying shit like ipods and such, but clothing?
get real.

dont know what to write. nowdays specialy in europe, i think, people waste alot of money on clothings, stuff lige dolce banana and guchi.
well now a few people starts to buy their clothes from 2nd hand, there is a market and there is a capital blah, but nevertheless its better, cheaper, and prettier, and also symbolic, to buy clothes from 2nd hand, or make them yourself, i repair my own damn clothes if it miss a button, and many of my friends are shocked, another is to get your parents old clothes, or your brothers, or your grandparents, its maybe not "cool" but this is what its all about, go against the stream and btw, would a rightish start a revolution?
im not sure if you get my point and i dont think you will get it. little note

Guest

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

that only creates newer markets.

not if you dont buy anything related to clothes.

lets be honest, you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.

yes i do. i wish i could say tl.dr

fucking prove it then.

according to your "theory" procuring only clothing supports the market; ergo supports capitalism.
i think that apple is a little bit more evil then champion.
i will agree with the sentiment that buying things supports the market, but seriously lets be fucking realistic, will a boycott work when only leftists do it?
no because then again, they will create new markets and new products made just for the leftists.
the domestic made and the environmentally sound garbage.

its like kashi and kellogg.
kashi started as a good, healthy, natural, vegan, cereal brand, now look who owns the?

i agree with not supporting monopolies and not buying shit like ipods and such, but clothing?
get real.

dont know what to write. nowdays specialy in europe, i think, people waste alot of money on clothings, stuff lige dolce banana and guchi.
well now a few people starts to buy their clothes from 2nd hand, there is a market and there is a capital blah, but nevertheless its better, cheaper, and prettier, and also symbolic, to buy clothes from 2nd hand, or make them yourself, i repair my own damn clothes if it miss a button, and many of my friends are shocked, another is to get your parents old clothes, or your brothers, or your grandparents, its maybe not "cool" but this is what its all about, go against the stream and btw, would a rightish start a revolution?
im not sure if you get my point and i dont think you will get it. little note

of course people waste money on shit, its not like im wearing designer clothing. so honestly this just proves yet again, you have no clue what is going on.
and a rightist starting a revolution is called a reaction.

**Tyrlop** · Subject: Re: Your vestimentary style ? Wed Mar 25, 2009 7:04 pm

beatnikzach wrote:

and a rightist starting a revolution is called a reaction.

not really, reaction is a counter action. not a rightish revolution.

**Zealot_Kommunizma** · Subject: Re: Your vestimentary style ? Wed Mar 25, 2009 8:07 pm

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

and a rightist starting a revolution is called a reaction.

not really, reaction is a counter action. not a rightish revolution.

In revolutionary terms "reaction" is the opposition to the revolutionary change. Change is the action, it's attempted prevention the reaction.

_________________

**Jesus** · Subject: Re: Your vestimentary style ? Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:52 pm

Ok so wtf does that have to do with clothing?

_________________
An I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know I am the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you
- Ezekial 25:17

**Zealot_Kommunizma** · Subject: Re: Your vestimentary style ? Thu Mar 26, 2009 7:49 am

Jesus wrote:

Ok so wtf does that have to do with clothing?

That, in Tyrlop's understanding, it's anti-socialist to wear or get certain kind of clothing making that person, in revolutionary terms, apparently at least, a reactionary. In other words, he'd be arguing that people's reactionarity can be judged by their clothing.

_________________

Guest

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Jesus wrote:

Ok so wtf does that have to do with clothing?

That, in Tyrlop's understanding, it's anti-socialist to wear or get certain kind of clothing making that person, in revolutionary terms, apparently at least, a reactionary. In other words, he'd be arguing that people's reactionarity can be judged by their clothing.

and we all know, that im the biggest reactionary.

**Liche** · Subject: Re: Your vestimentary style ? Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:32 pm

What I mean is, theres no one ever trying to slow things down, they just might not support what your doing.

Example:

The Communists revolt forcefully, the police stop them.

This dose not make the police reactionaries, their not trying to stop Human progression, they are trying to stop Communism. They think Communism is wrong, and therefor are not reactionaries, they just did not support what the Communists were doing.

**Jesus** · Subject: Re: Your vestimentary style ? Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:21 am

Clothing, is just clothing, you can wear something with an image you really dont support, because it looks nice, really theres no bid deal to do about it.

_________________
An I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know I am the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you
- Ezekial 25:17

**Zealot_Kommunizma** · Subject: Re: Your vestimentary style ? Fri Mar 27, 2009 3:36 am

Liche wrote:

What I mean is, theres no one ever trying to slow things down, they just might not support what your doing.

And then stopping it.

Liche wrote:

Example:

The Communists revolt forcefully, the police stop them.

Communists defy private propertyy over means of production something that can only be done forcefully disregarding the one who thinks he's the legitimate owner and the establishment.

This defiance is progressive, it's a change. Trying to stop it is reaction.

Liche wrote:

This dose not make the police reactionaries, their not trying to stop Human progression, they are trying to stop Communism.

Oxymoron.

Liche wrote:

They think Communism is wrong, and therefor are not reactionaries, they just did not support what the Communists were doing.

They're with the state and the ruling class trying to avoid a change, they're reacting to that change. They're reactionaries just for doing what they're doing regardless of whether their conviction is that communism is wrong, they get a hard on while beating workers, or both. They're reactionaires or at least a reactionary tool.

_________________