WeiWuWei New Party Member
Posts: 595 Join date: 2008-04-14 Age: 20 Location: Failida
 | Subject: Re: Hutin's new political profile ! Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:00 pm | |
| | Liche wrote: | | Zealot_Kommunizma wrote: | Lich, don't be shy to be an opportunistic elitist! |
Ok, *bows to King Hutin of France*
I like absolute monarchy, it is very efficient.
Also efficient, is Confederacy, but not Anarchy or Libertarianism.
Liberalism and Socialism are also fairly well working. |
Efficient =/= Good.
Sure, Monarchies are successful at accumulating vast amounts of Capital. But so is Capitalism - heck, it's in the name. In fact, so were slave societies. They were wildly efficient; doesn't mean that they were good, in any kind of ethical sense.
But Socialism and Monarchism are completely incompatable. You can't have workers' control over the means of production if there is a KING.
From Anarchism to Absolute Monarchism... quite a full circle you've traveled, eh?  _________________  |
|
Zealot_Kommunizma Hero of the World Republic
Posts: 5209 Join date: 2007-12-06 Age: 21 Location: Mexico/Russia/Worl
 | Subject: Re: Hutin's new political profile ! Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:45 pm | |
| | WeiWuWei wrote: |
From Anarchism to Absolute Monarchism... quite a full circle you've traveled, eh?  |
Don't tell him that or he'll begin with a "polical originality spree" again.
Abd I'm glad you mentioned this "it's in the name" I couldn't agree more. There are some that are known as Monarchy, others known as Bourgeoisie and, the State, it is the one who chooses the name sometimes. Some call themselves democracy, others like the catchy "National Socialism". But no one has caused more ideological damage than those that chose "Communist Party of X land" or "People's Republic of Y". |
|