this is a serious topic.

i want to see your opinions

pro choice or pro life

remeber you cant always be 100% for ethier one. its a moral dilema to be that way

i think pro choice, but only if raped, unable to handle finacial stress, or cant birth.
if you were jsut stupid, birth the baby and adopt it out

Pro choice ftw!

but what if they were just careless, didnt use comdoms. you would still support it
becuase then they're is no punishment for thier careless deeds

i think you are right, but maybe they should still brith it

also what if you were trying to have a child, and you fond out it was going to be retarted, would you abort(or allow it)

i dont know.
i mean you figure that out at stage 3, by then the baby is ike 4 weeks from being almost fully developed

no no
you can still abort
it wont hurt, but still i mean

We already discussed this topic....

Simple: Scientifically and objectively abortion is murder for it implies the interruption of life.

Is interrupting this life ok or not? In my view nothing justifies murder, not even economic conditions or rape.

bu sometimes the egg attached to the fallopian tube instead of the uterus
if left to develop, it will burst killing mother and baby.

would you let an abortion for that, or else both die!

good
also do you belive yourself a knwoleageable person on life and global warming(not comparing, just aksing)

i think this is a racial question, its a matter of race if its murder to kill a baby before its born, sure some babys of certain race of course have less value, and to prevent overflow of people.

Largely, I think that this subject is - whether intentionally or not - illusory; it reduces our level of discourse and it keeps the general public unaware of the genuinely important issues - like Capitalism v. Socialism. It raises blinders to the things that truly require attention, along with gay marriage, illegal immigration, gun rights, etc.

But, if I had to answer, I would have to be considered pro-choice, for lack of giving a shit about an embryo, which is the operative word here. It's not a baby. It's an embryo.

You could, perhaps, raise the argument that the unwanted fetus is coercing upon the mother. Their relationship is involuntary, and since the mother is an actual living and breathing human being I would have to think that any recourse could be seen as legitimate and even necessary on her part.

Again, though, abortion is a stupid issue.

By the way, here's a fun little link a found a while back when arguing about abortion. Check it out: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21255186/

that was pretty funny.
but what about stem cells,(form of abortion)

do you belive that women should be able to sell there eggs for stemcell research?
tehre not going to use them, so why not right. stem cells could help cure spinal problems and what not