RULES AND GUIDELINES

I am not. They are technically the same but differ in the fact that Nazism can also be concidered a religion..those nazi's were creapy.. look it up dude.. they thought the world was hallow and UFO's would save them from defeat..

Diogritor wrote:

I am not. They are technically the same but differ in the fact that Nazism can also be concidered a religion..those nazi's were creapy.. look it up dude.. they thought the world was hallow and UFO's would save them from defeat..

The Indian nazis claim the Rig Vedas contain instructions to build V2 rockets. I also hear that at some point they decided the all the retarded people they had imprisoned knew how to win the war for some reason.

Diogritor wrote:

Mussolini just invaided Etheopia..


Nazism in its form of Economy is the same but is fundamentaly different in that you can argue that Nazism is a cult. Nazi's belive fully in the propoganda Hitler used.((I.E the master race, The world will be ours, and the world is hollow...look that one up lulz.))

lol I saw that vid on youtube it made me LOL a lot

inkus2000 wrote:

On fascism:

I dont agree with it:

However it is often argued that communism/socialism are evil based on the actions of Stalin and Pol Pot. Perhaps it is unfair to judge Fascism on the actions of Hitler, under Benito Mussolini the system was far less barbaric than lets say, 'socialism under Pol Pot'.

I agree that germany and italy were not good examples of fascism. But this does not mean that fascism should be tolerated.

A pillar of fascist society is government restriction on... anything they want!

No restrictions of freedom and autonomy should be tolerated. No one has authority over another human beings life. That's part of the reason i disagree with the restrictions on profanity.

NoJustice.NoPeace wrote:

inkus2000 wrote:

On fascism:

I dont agree with it:

However it is often argued that communism/socialism are evil based on the actions of Stalin and Pol Pot. Perhaps it is unfair to judge Fascism on the actions of Hitler, under Benito Mussolini the system was far less barbaric than lets say, 'socialism under Pol Pot'.

I agree that germany and italy were not good examples of fascism. But this does not mean that fascism should be tolerated.

A pillar of fascist society is government restriction on... anything they want!

No restrictions of freedom and autonomy should be tolerated. No one has authority over another human beings life. That's part of the reason i disagree with the restrictions on profanity.

Fascism itself may restrict some freedoms but only those that would threaten the state itself. Is this so bad in todays world where you have t lets say take your shoes off at an airport or "Homeland Security"?

Quote :

Fascism itself may restrict some freedoms only those that would threaten the state itself

If that's all fascism is we're living in fascism already.

Pannekoek wrote:

Quote :

Fascism itself may restrict some freedoms only those that would threaten the state itself

If that's all fascism is we're living in fascism already.

if you are talking about the U.S then ding ding we have a winner.

I was talking about every country in the world but U.S. is a prime example.

Diogritor wrote:

if you are talking about the U.S then ding ding we have a winner.

Sarcasm? Or do you really think the US is fascist? If you do, then i'd ask you how you believe marijuana is a threat to the state.

NoJustice.NoPeace wrote:

Diogritor wrote:

if you are talking about the U.S then ding ding we have a winner.

Sarcasm? Or do you really think the US is fascist? If you do, then i'd ask you how you believe marijuana is a threat to the state.

I think anything that takes you out of your normal thinking is Dangerous to an extent. Not so much pot but you get the idea. America has been leaning torwards fascism since 9/11. Airplane checks, "Patriot act," wire taps all sound a lot like something I would do if I was trying to control keep my people safe.

Diogritor wrote:

NoJustice.NoPeace wrote:

Diogritor wrote:

if you are talking about the U.S then ding ding we have a winner.

Sarcasm? Or do you really think the US is fascist? If you do, then i'd ask you how you believe marijuana is a threat to the state.

I think anything that takes you out of your normal thinking is Dangerous to an extent. Not so much pot but you get the idea. America has been leaning torwards fascism since 9/11. Airplane checks, "Patriot act," wire taps all sound a lot like something I would do if I was trying to control keep my people safe.

haha I almost forgot how rediculous the Patriot act is.

Diogritor wrote:

I think anything that takes you out of your normal thinking is Dangerous to an extent. Not so much pot but you get the idea. America has been leaning torwards fascism since 9/11. Airplane checks, "Patriot act," wire taps all sound a lot like something I would do if I was trying to control keep my people safe.

That wasn't the question. I want to know (since this fascist state only puts restrictions on dangers to the state) how hemp is dangerous to the state, specifically.

NoJustice.NoPeace wrote:

Diogritor wrote:

I think anything that takes you out of your normal thinking is Dangerous to an extent. Not so much pot but you get the idea. America has been leaning torwards fascism since 9/11. Airplane checks, "Patriot act," wire taps all sound a lot like something I would do if I was trying to control keep my people safe.

That wasn't the question. I want to know (since this fascist state only puts restrictions on dangers to the state) how hemp is dangerous to the state, specifically.

Look at the hippies during the Vietnam War. I am of a belief that the low support for our troops was whywe lost. What were the hippies doing? Smoking pot and doing coke. Guess what you do after you do drugs?

"Hey man, The Government is out to get us man. Lets go hug a tree man."

Diogritor wrote:

Look at the hippies during the Vietnam War. I am of a belief that the low support for our troops was whywe lost. What were the hippies doing? Smoking pot and doing coke.

And? If they weren't doing drugs, you think they would've wanted to join, or even support, an illegal war? Sorry man, but i don't buy that.

Quote :

Guess what you do after you do drugs?"Hey man, The Government is out to get us man. Lets go hug a tree man."

Speak for yourself. I was anti-government far before i started takin drugs. And i never felt any more inclined to hug a tree, or anything/one for that matter. It just makes me wanna eat cheetos.

NoJustice.NoPeace wrote:

Diogritor wrote:

Look at the hippies during the Vietnam War. I am of a belief that the low support for our troops was whywe lost. What were the hippies doing? Smoking pot and doing coke.

And? If they weren't doing drugs, you think they would've wanted to join, or even support, an illegal war? Sorry man, but i don't buy that.

Quote :

Guess what you do after you do drugs?"Hey man, The Government is out to get us man. Lets go hug a tree man."

Speak for yourself. I was anti-government far before i started takin drugs. And i never felt any more inclined to hug a tree, or anything/one for that matter. It just makes me wanna eat cheetos.

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh you said war..............remember Johnson called it a conflict.....You can completely bi-pass congress(they have the power to declare war not the prez) if you just say it is a conflict

Kenzu wrote:

Extent of punishment for braking rules has been increased to safeguard a polite and manerly treatment of members.

Ambiguous. Develop the idea clearly.

Kenzu wrote:

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Kenzu wrote:

Extent of punishment for braking rules has been increased to safeguard a polite and manerly treatment of members.

Ambiguous. Develop the idea clearly.

People will get harsher punishments. 2 week punishments should be expected for any behaviour which would be usually considered offending towards a person or a group of people.

Example: posting to someone who isn't watermelon:
"Whatever you say Watermelon"

=> 2 weeks ban

Example:
"You are stupid"

=> 2 weeks ban

Example:
"Are you retarded?"

=> 2 weeks ban

Example: Towards a person who never said he/she was stalinist:
"You are stalinist"

=> 2 weeks ban

I think it is pretty clear.

Kind of like what they do in north korea. Except it applies to lesser offenses.

Kenzu wrote:

Example: Towards a person who never said he/she was stalinist:
"You are stalinist"

=> 2 weeks ban

I think it is pretty clear.

What if the one who accuses can demonstrate that said person is defacto a Stalinist?

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Kenzu wrote:

Example: Towards a person who never said he/she was stalinist:
"You are stalinist"

=> 2 weeks ban

I think it is pretty clear.

What if the one who accuses can demonstrate that said person is defacto a Stalinist?

Then we'll throw them in the lake, if they drown, we'll know they were right, because only a witch can could know someone's a Stalinist without said person's admission.

How about a vote on this, to see if people support something so outrageous?

Black_Cross wrote:

Then we'll throw them in the lake, if they drown, we'll know they were right, because only a witch can could know someone's a Stalinist without said person's admission.

How about a vote on this, to see if people support something so outrageous?

Wait a minute.... since when is popular opinion relevant here?

Kenzu wrote:

Example: Towards a person who never said he/she was stalinist:
"You are stalinist"

=> 2 weeks ban

Mabie kenzu has something against Stalinists?

comrade110397 wrote:

Mabie kenzu has something against Stalinists?

No, that's a clear warning to those that have called him "stalinist" or "closet stalinist".