The World Bank (WB) and the(IMF)

A clip from the documentary "The New Rulers of The World" by film maker John Pilger.

The WB and the IMF control most of the world's cash flow.
Please check out all of John Pilger's documentaries.


More neo liberal imperialism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xgxCf05Kmw&feature=related

Wonderful little tools aren't they.

"We'll help you by making you in debt to us, or we'll send in the CIA"

You guys need to read "Confessions of an Economic Hitman"

or if your too lazy download the audio book here:

http://files.filefront.com/Confessions+of+an+Econominzip/;9915390;/fileinfo.html

World Bank (the Bank), is an internationally supported bank that provides loans to developing countries for development programs (e.g. bridges, roads, schools, etc.) with the stated goal of reducing poverty. The World Bank differs from the World Bank Group in that the former comprises only the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the International Development Association, while the latter incorporates these entities in addition to three others.[1] The World Bank was formally established on December 27, 1945, following the ratification of the Bretton Woods agreement. The concept was originally conceived in July 1944 at the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference. Two years later, the Bank issued its first loan: $250 million to France for post-war reconstruction, the main focus of the Bank's work in the early post-World War II years. Over time, the "development" side of the Bank's work has assumed a larger share of its lending, although it is still involved in post-conflict reconstruction, together with reconstruction after natural disasters, response to humanitarian emergencies and post-conflict rehabilitation needs affecting developing and transition economies.

For the poorest developing countries in the world the Bank’s assistance plans are based on Poverty Reduction Strategies; by combining a cross-section of local groups with an extensive analysis of the country’s financial and economical situation the World Bank develops a strategy pertaining uniquely to the country in question. The government then identifies the country’s priorities and targets for the reduction of poverty, and the World Bank aligns its aid efforts correspondingly.

The Bank supports certain kinds of poor people's organisations such as the Self-Employed Women's Union and Shack/Slum Dwellers International.

Forty-five countries pledged US$25.1 billion in "aid for the world's poorest countries", aid that goes to the World Bank International Development Association (I.D.A.) which distributes the gifts to eighty poorer countries. While wealthier nations sometimes fund their own aid projects, including those for diseases recently, and although I.D.A. is the recipient of criticism, Robert B. Zoellick, the president of the World Bank, said when the gifts were announced on December 15, 2007, that I.D.A. money "is the core funding that the poorest developing countries rely on".[3]

mattabesta wrote:

World Bank (the Bank), is an internationally supported bank that provides loans to developing countries for development programs (e.g. bridges, roads, schools, etc.) with the stated goal of reducing poverty. The World Bank differs from the World Bank Group in that the former comprises only the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the International Development Association, while the latter incorporates these entities in addition to three others.[1] The World Bank was formally established on December 27, 1945, following the ratification of the Bretton Woods agreement. The concept was originally conceived in July 1944 at the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference. Two years later, the Bank issued its first loan: $250 million to France for post-war reconstruction, the main focus of the Bank's work in the early post-World War II years. Over time, the "development" side of the Bank's work has assumed a larger share of its lending, although it is still involved in post-conflict reconstruction, together with reconstruction after natural disasters, response to humanitarian emergencies and post-conflict rehabilitation needs affecting developing and transition economies.

For the poorest developing countries in the world the Bank’s assistance plans are based on Poverty Reduction Strategies; by combining a cross-section of local groups with an extensive analysis of the country’s financial and economical situation the World Bank develops a strategy pertaining uniquely to the country in question. The government then identifies the country’s priorities and targets for the reduction of poverty, and the World Bank aligns its aid efforts correspondingly.

The Bank supports certain kinds of poor people's organisations such as the Self-Employed Women's Union and Shack/Slum Dwellers International.

Forty-five countries pledged US$25.1 billion in "aid for the world's poorest countries", aid that goes to the World Bank International Development Association (I.D.A.) which distributes the gifts to eighty poorer countries. While wealthier nations sometimes fund their own aid projects, including those for diseases recently, and although I.D.A. is the recipient of criticism, Robert B. Zoellick, the president of the World Bank, said when the gifts were announced on December 15, 2007, that I.D.A. money "is the core funding that the poorest developing countries rely on".[3]

Hey mattabesta everyone can use wikipidia
The world bank is tool of the neo liberal agenda - that so called 'aid for the world's poorest countries" comes at a price 1- mass privatization of public owned org 2 - Free access to natural resources, for use in the developed world 3- opening the nation to the est of sweatshops ect.

Besides you should join another party - neo Liberalism has failed
Become an SD -

There should be only 2 parties: Revolutionary Marxists and Liberals.

Emy wrote:

There should be only 2 parties: Revolutionary Marxists and Liberals.

What are you on ?
You radicals don't have a clue, Spartacist League/Spartacus Youth Club ?
What the fuck is that ?

A bunch of 17 year old idiots who's mothers drop them at rallies to play soldiers every week ?

Death to the capitalists !

Emy wrote:

There should be only 2 parties: Revolutionary Marxists and Liberals.

We don't need the f*cking liberals. Stalinist party is a better idea

Seeing as this is a forum for everyone I think we should allow liberals. But good point we should have 3 parties: Revolutionary Marxists, Stalinists, and liberals.

Emy wrote:

Seeing as this is a forum for everyone I think we should allow liberals. But good point we should have 3 parties: Revolutionary Marxists, Stalinists, and liberals.

Not all socialists are Marxists and theres a big diff between Social liberalism and Libertarian socialism.

We should have a Libertarian socialist party the social dems are full of Social liberals.

DAmmit why do we have to have so many ideologies why don't we stick the soc dems and noncom socs in with the liberals. Theyre basically the same anyway.

inkus2000 wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

World Bank (the Bank), is an internationally supported bank that provides loans to developing countries for development programs (e.g. bridges, roads, schools, etc.) with the stated goal of reducing poverty. The World Bank differs from the World Bank Group in that the former comprises only the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the International Development Association, while the latter incorporates these entities in addition to three others.[1] The World Bank was formally established on December 27, 1945, following the ratification of the Bretton Woods agreement. The concept was originally conceived in July 1944 at the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference. Two years later, the Bank issued its first loan: $250 million to France for post-war reconstruction, the main focus of the Bank's work in the early post-World War II years. Over time, the "development" side of the Bank's work has assumed a larger share of its lending, although it is still involved in post-conflict reconstruction, together with reconstruction after natural disasters, response to humanitarian emergencies and post-conflict rehabilitation needs affecting developing and transition economies.

For the poorest developing countries in the world the Bank’s assistance plans are based on Poverty Reduction Strategies; by combining a cross-section of local groups with an extensive analysis of the country’s financial and economical situation the World Bank develops a strategy pertaining uniquely to the country in question. The government then identifies the country’s priorities and targets for the reduction of poverty, and the World Bank aligns its aid efforts correspondingly.

The Bank supports certain kinds of poor people's organisations such as the Self-Employed Women's Union and Shack/Slum Dwellers International.

Forty-five countries pledged US$25.1 billion in "aid for the world's poorest countries", aid that goes to the World Bank International Development Association (I.D.A.) which distributes the gifts to eighty poorer countries. While wealthier nations sometimes fund their own aid projects, including those for diseases recently, and although I.D.A. is the recipient of criticism, Robert B. Zoellick, the president of the World Bank, said when the gifts were announced on December 15, 2007, that I.D.A. money "is the core funding that the poorest developing countries rely on".[3]

Hey mattabesta everyone can use wikipidia
The world bank is tool of the neo liberal agenda - that so called 'aid for the world's poorest countries" comes at a price 1- mass privatization of public owned org 2 - Free access to natural resources, for use in the developed world 3- opening the nation to the est of sweatshops ect.

Besides you should join another party - neo Liberalism has failed
Become an SD -

liberalism failed.. right...

I don't see those things as "bad"

inkus2000 wrote:

Emy wrote:

There should be only 2 parties: Revolutionary Marxists and Liberals.

What are you on ?
You radicals don't have a clue, Spartacist League/Spartacus Youth Club ?
What the fuck is that ?

A bunch of 17 year old idiots who's mothers drop them at rallies to play soldiers every week ?

Death to the capitalists !

Wow you are really informed arnt you? Sparticus league are probably the most learned marxist orgs out there. They understand that you can only have communism once you smash the capitalist state. While you have no idea what communism is at all.

you don´t have to take away the satate for communism, if you do you smash away the establishment that will help communism in the future.

mattabesta wrote:

you don´t have to take away the satate for communism, if you do you smash away the establishment that will help communism in the future.

there is absolutly no state in conmmunism

wned sucka.



marxists.org is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth

Watermelon wrote:

marxists.org is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth

Oh...lords...

Is that ALL you look at for your "communistic" facts? Just a single website? And wikipedia?

Unlike you, MUCH of whom you call "non-Marxists" has STUDIED/IS STUDYING communism and knows what they are talking about! They don't pull off knee-jerk reactions like what you do. Your absolute "presistence" and BLIND complete loyality to this dead guy named Karl Marx is enough proof!

If there's one thing that disgusts me about communism, then it's the know-it-alls to claim to be communist. Ugh.

Get a brain and accept other people's opinions openly.

Quote :

BLIND complete loyality to this dead guy named Karl Marx

*pukes*
*pukes again*

I must be having trouble with my vision.