To ban Calinis

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

calinis wrote:

spam is allowed. that's why there is a thread for spam.

But the quality of your spam is low.

lol true

Ban.

Wow, two people wanna suck his dick? Nice. I bet Hutin and... calinis

15 votes!

Poll's closed with 60% of votes for permaban.

no it's not finished

calinis wrote:

no it's not finished

Really?

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Rules:

This poll will run until it has 15 votes or 2 weeks.
Winning option must count with 51% of votes at least, if it doesn't happen a 2nd round will take place leaving just the 4 more popular options. If the scenary repeats, just 2 options will be preserved for 3rd round.
No votes will have to have a well founded reason to be explained in a post. If there are "no" votes but there are no posts supporting the "no" option noes won't count (o noes..). In other words for each no vote there must be one post per "no"-supportive user. Example: There are 5 no votes but only one post founding the no posture, only 1 no will count. Got it?

Case closed.

lol

Who do you think likes to suck his balls?

so it's closed becuse the person that hates calins the most says so?
I mean that's REALLY communist.

mattabesta wrote:

so it's closed becuse the person that hates calins the most says so?

I set rules no one objected to. NOT A SINGLE PERSON, not even Calinis. By not objecting to them they were approved.

mattabesta wrote:

I mean that's REALLY communist.

Says someone whose knowledge on communism is practically unexistant.

Disregarding facts, distorting information and engaging in slander... that seems to be capitalist, basing on your logic that if someone with a certain ideology does something it must unavoidably represet the character of his ideology.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

so it's closed becuse the person that hates calins the most says so?

I set rules no one objected to. NOT A SINGLE PERSON, not even Calinis. By not objecting to them they were approved.

mattabesta wrote:

I mean that's REALLY communist.

Says someone whose knowledge on communism is practically unexistant.

Disregarding facts, distorting information and engaging in slander... that seems to be capitalist, basing on your logic that if someone with a certain ideology does something it must unavoidably represet the character of his ideology.

lol I just made the moast epic answer but this site seems to have a character limit and my big post is gone

mattabesta wrote:

lol I just made the moast epic answer but this site seems to have a character limit and my big post is gone

Probably you just randomly copied and pasted the whole wikilibrary on Law.

Even I want him to get banned for ever...
we should ban him for ignorance.

and gulag him.

with Zealot's g...never mind.

Liche wrote:

Even I want him to get banned for ever...
we should ban him for ignorance.

and gulag him.

with Zealot's g...never mind.

People support banning him, it's just matter of putting that into effect.

no please dont ban me.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

lol I just made the moast epic answer but this site seems to have a character limit and my big post is gone

Probably you just randomly copied and pasted the whole wikilibrary on Law.

yeah and I also mad a billion phragraph definition of capitalism.

mattabesta wrote:

yeah and I also mad a billion phragraph definition of capitalism.

Straw, plain straw.

I VOTED GFOREVER

"Should we turn the tape recorder off?"

This whole phrasing is very offensive AND he has not been given a fair trial. The question was very suggestive so we can make it count.

Kenzu...if you only was here when the guy was spamming the place. If you ONLY saw everything...

Kenzu, in this trial the jury are the witnesses.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Kenzu, in this trial the jury are the witnesses.

Who are the jury in this case?

CoolKidX wrote:

Who are the jury in this case?

Those who voted.

Kenzu wrote:

"Should we turn the tape recorder off?"

This whole phrasing is very offensive AND he has not been given a fair trial. The question was very suggestive so we can make it count.

People have been banned for much less here. And without a trial.

This whole thread is illegitimate. I have never seen a more unbiased thread in my whole life.

Even if it was so, you have agreed to ban a TAPE RECORDER and not calinis. Thus calinis can stay.

Kenzu wrote:

This whole thread is illegitimate. I have never seen a more unbiased thread in my whole life.

Thanks for recognizing it is unbiased. I don't see how objectivity is negative though and moreover illegitimate and more when it is backed up by a majourity. How, given those circumstances, can this thread be illegitimate?

Kenzu wrote:

Even if it was so, you have agreed to ban a TAPE RECORDER and not calinis. Thus calinis can stay.

The tape recorder is calinis. The context in which the conflict developed greatly demonstrates that.