Stos New Party Member
Posts : 546 Join date : 2008-09-14
| Subject: Re: Socialism vs. Communism Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:16 am | |
| - Hauthism wrote:
- The way I see Communism and Socialism is a partnership Communism - More of a Military regime... Stalin made communism a Total War political party with the 5 year plans, with the phrase "2 steps forward 1 step back" While Socialism is more well... Social... Its the Diplomats communism... Communism is socialism where Diplomacy Failed.
...What. | |
|
Stos New Party Member
Posts : 546 Join date : 2008-09-14
| Subject: Re: Socialism vs. Communism Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:34 am | |
| - Hoxhaist wrote:
- hauthism you are a dumbass
socialism is when the working class is the ruling class
communism is when there are no classes
end of discussion You're still wrong. | |
|
Cyprian Uljanow World Republic Party Member
Posts : 690 Join date : 2008-03-25 Age : 45 Location : Wroclaw
| Subject: Re: Socialism vs. Communism Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:06 pm | |
| on a more related not, who was dumb enought to let Melon back in the party? | |
|
Stos New Party Member
Posts : 546 Join date : 2008-09-14
| Subject: Re: Socialism vs. Communism Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:16 pm | |
| - Cyprian Uljanow wrote:
- on a more related not, who was dumb enought to let Melon back in the party?
Kenzu, apparently. | |
|
WeiWuWei World Republic Party Member
Posts : 624 Join date : 2008-04-14 Age : 47
| Subject: Re: Socialism vs. Communism Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:43 pm | |
| - Stos wrote:
- Hoxhaist wrote:
- hauthism you are a dumbass
socialism is when the working class is the ruling class
communism is when there are no classes
end of discussion You're still wrong. In all fairness, I'd think that the way Hoxhaist described the two here - although it is a little bit short - is roughly accurate. | |
|
Hauthism New Friend
Posts : 3 Join date : 2008-11-03 Age : 29 Location : Tulsa, Oklahoma
| Subject: Re: Socialism vs. Communism Tue Dec 09, 2008 9:20 pm | |
| Well I believe that the line between socialism and communism is a small one most of their ideals are close, I'm sorry I was talking about true communism not the currupt society like the ones we have now, more of a All for all and none for the leader group. Sorry if that were to confuse or if my opinion is different from yours, but socialism is very much like communism with more of an equality to it, now this is how I see it I don't want to cause an argument. The working class in my opinion is the ruling class in any society if they have unions and refuse to work. Sharing the wealth is good but it's not an answer, it would be best if there was no money and almost like a amish society.
Last edited by Hauthism on Tue Dec 09, 2008 9:22 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : Forgot a sentence) | |
|
Stos New Party Member
Posts : 546 Join date : 2008-09-14
| Subject: Re: Socialism vs. Communism Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:19 am | |
| - WeiWuWei wrote:
- Stos wrote:
- Hoxhaist wrote:
- hauthism you are a dumbass
socialism is when the working class is the ruling class
communism is when there are no classes
end of discussion You're still wrong. In all fairness, I'd think that the way Hoxhaist described the two here - although it is a little bit short - is roughly accurate. Except that it's wrong, if we are to use Marx and other anarchists of the time's terminology rather than fall into that of Lenin and his cronies. | |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Socialism vs. Communism | |
| |
|