World Republic

Uniting All People!
 
HomeHome  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  UsergroupsUsergroups  Log in  

Share | 
 

 Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
CoolKidX
Chairman of the Supreme Council
avatar

Posts : 4639
Join date : 2008-02-14
Location : Netherlands

PostSubject: Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.   Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:58 am

Let's say someone spams or trolls really hard, obviously he will get banned.

And as you for a more democratic canidate will post a poll, yes?(If no don't answer next one).

But, if the poll is up, and its not yet decided if he will get banned, what will happen to that person who spammed/trolled?
Put him under house-arrest or seomthing?

_________________
"Fuck gotta invade Ukraine" -- Vladimir Putin
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Lilith
Hero of Socialist Labor
avatar

Posts : 458
Join date : 2008-07-17
Age : 24
Location : Let me check on googlemap..

PostSubject: Re: Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.   Mon Jan 19, 2009 2:33 am

Well, if that person is really spamming and bothering people, the person should be dirrecly banned until the real decisions have been taken. The poll would be very short (max 2 days) and then, after, the decison would be applied.

Or maybe we can take an other type of decision, another system than polls that would be better before banning someone If an administrator recieve 3 PM because members think a person should be banned, then, the person is going to be banned, but to let the chance to other people to give their opinion, there would be a poll during one or 2 days to decide is that person deserve to be banned or no.

I would precise that the administrator would in right to make a jugement if that person should be banned or no during the poll. Each case is different. If that person really looks like trolling very hard, he could be banned during that time, if not, there's real urgent need to see that person banned.

(hehe, I like this color Razz)

_________________

Back to top Go down
View user profile http://lily-chan.over-blog.com
CoolKidX
Chairman of the Supreme Council
avatar

Posts : 4639
Join date : 2008-02-14
Location : Netherlands

PostSubject: Re: Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.   Mon Jan 19, 2009 2:37 am

Lilith wrote:
Well, if that person is really spamming and bothering people, the person should be dirrecly banned until the real decisions have been taken. The poll would be very short (max 2 days) and then, after, the decison would be applied.
Like house-arrest, you are banned until the decions are made?

_________________
"Fuck gotta invade Ukraine" -- Vladimir Putin
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Lilith
Hero of Socialist Labor
avatar

Posts : 458
Join date : 2008-07-17
Age : 24
Location : Let me check on googlemap..

PostSubject: Re: Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.   Mon Jan 19, 2009 2:54 am

Well, yeah, But it's still relative to the case. In the case where the member is really trolling hard and disturbing people, yeah, I think that would be the best thing to do. The automatic ban should only be when it's necessary or looks very evident. Otherwise no need to ban.

_________________

Back to top Go down
View user profile http://lily-chan.over-blog.com
Liche
Chairman of the Supreme Council
avatar

Posts : 4613
Join date : 2008-01-30
Age : 24
Location : USA-Virginia

PostSubject: Re: Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.   Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:50 am

first 3day ban, and the Troll is aloud back on, but blocked from everything except the trial. And also I would do a poll to see how much spam before they are banned (they will get notified by PM saying Warning, you have comitted spam).
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.epol.forumotion.com
Hutin
Komsomol Member
avatar

Posts : 169
Join date : 2009-01-24
Age : 25
Location : Soviet Socialist Republic of Québec

PostSubject: Re: Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.   Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:26 pm

Coolkid & Democracy ; two sworn enemies.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
CoolKidX
Chairman of the Supreme Council
avatar

Posts : 4639
Join date : 2008-02-14
Location : Netherlands

PostSubject: Re: Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.   Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:06 pm

Hutin_Khan wrote:
Coolkid & Democracy ; two sworn enemies.
Explain yourself please.

..And he never replied... though he was since he posted this more then 10 times online..

_________________
"Fuck gotta invade Ukraine" -- Vladimir Putin


Last edited by CoolKidX on Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Black_Cross
Chairman of the WR Committee
avatar

Posts : 1702
Join date : 2008-04-04
Age : 29
Location : Sisyphean Hell

PostSubject: Re: Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.   Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:50 pm

CoolKidX wrote:
Let's say someone spams or trolls really hard, obviously he will get banned.

And as you for a more democratic canidate will post a poll, yes?(If no don't answer next one).

But, if the poll is up, and its not yet decided if he will get banned, what will happen to that person who spammed/trolled?
Put him under house-arrest or seomthing?

How about we deal with the decision making rather quickly, and allow this troll a couple more days to do his worst (note the exaggeration here). If the person is trolling, we'll know immidiately, and be able to decide quickly how to resolve it.

I'm leaning towards a sub-forum, accessible by all those members we know are not trolls, and this committee will resolve the problem as soon as possible (i think three day polls would be sufficient). Then, after solving the issue quickly, any part of the committee that may not have been there for a few days can give their opinion, and if there's enough dissent, the ban can be removed/applied according to popular opinion.

I think this is the safest, fastest, and most democratic way to run the security of the site.

As for any proposals for change on the site, the process can be slowed down a bit so as to ensure everyone gets a chance to give their opinion.

_________________
"A market economy must comprise all elements of industry including labor, land and money [...] But labor and land are no other than the human beings themselves of which every society consists and the natural surroundings in which it exists. To include them in the market mechanism means to subordinate the substance of society itself."
--Karl Polanyi--
Back to top Go down
View user profile
CoolKidX
Chairman of the Supreme Council
avatar

Posts : 4639
Join date : 2008-02-14
Location : Netherlands

PostSubject: Re: Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.   Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:54 pm

BC that.. sounds great!!

David's one isnt bad either.
But I think BC's idea is a little better though.

_________________
"Fuck gotta invade Ukraine" -- Vladimir Putin
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Zealot_Kommunizma
Hero of the World Republic


Posts : 5413
Join date : 2007-12-06
Age : 29
Location : Mexico/Russia/Worl

PostSubject: Re: Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.   Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:48 pm

I wonder what we can do against clever and patient trolls though...

_________________
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://unitedrevleftfront.forumotion.com/
b0xxy
New Friend
avatar

Posts : 5
Join date : 2009-01-28

PostSubject: Re: Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.   Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:49 am

sometimes i also wonder the same, you know.
but hopefuly the election will rig in my favor
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.   Wed Jan 28, 2009 8:38 am

CoolKidX wrote:
Let's say someone spams or trolls really hard, obviously he will get banned.

And as you for a more democratic canidate will post a poll, yes?(If no don't answer next one).

But, if the poll is up, and its not yet decided if he will get banned, what will happen to that person who spammed/trolled?
Put him under house-arrest or seomthing?

under my system if the deliberations take that long then the admins yet again have a sub majority vote, to determine the outcome
if anyone is displeased, they can call a poll at anytime
except for the person on trial.
Back to top Go down
CoolKidX
Chairman of the Supreme Council
avatar

Posts : 4639
Join date : 2008-02-14
Location : Netherlands

PostSubject: Re: Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.   Wed Jan 28, 2009 5:55 pm

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:
I wonder what we can do against clever and patient trolls though...
Example = Rename right?

If so, I'd just say check every new members IP every week tell a month. But thats really up to the canidates.

_________________
"Fuck gotta invade Ukraine" -- Vladimir Putin
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Liche
Chairman of the Supreme Council
avatar

Posts : 4613
Join date : 2008-01-30
Age : 24
Location : USA-Virginia

PostSubject: Re: Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.   Wed Jan 28, 2009 7:14 pm

I WILL SCARE THEM OFF BY TYPING IN ALL CAPS!
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.epol.forumotion.com
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.   

Back to top Go down
 
Question for canidates who want the site more democratic.
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Remains of murdered woman found buried at building site
» Another McCann Site Closed
» Find Madeleine site update Day 1827 3 May 2012
» Creating Polls
» How can i edit HTML on my site?

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
World Republic :: Parliament :: Politics-
Jump to: