prozac

this is an old drug, but it is interesting
in 90% if the patients it was given it, it created a better mood and a better life. i has helped solve many depression problems, and even sort peoples life out.

what a wonderful age we are coming to when science influences mood

Are you being sarcastic? Because if not I disagree with you.

the last line was supposed to be sarcastic

i think that the medical companies are going to far

enviro wrote:

the last line was supposed to be sarcastic

i think that the medical companies are going to far

In that I have to agree.

Such things ought to destroy human identity.

i dont get why we need it.
your deppressed, so find a way out of it
which brings up to viagra
here is the order of things
you get erections, you have sex, you stop getting erections, and you die

no need to change what shouldnt be changed

I don't get what you're saying.

prozac is the drug hat inctes happy feelings and get people out of depression and into a better mood

i am saying the medical companies are going to far, letting people change there mood with pills

Um, some people are chronically depressed due to a chemical imbalance. Therapy won't help that. A drug will.

And why should the old not still be able to enjoy sex? And let's not forget impotence in the younger people.

i didnt say chemical imbalabnce is wrong, i said using just cuase you want to

also old people sex is gross. and its the naural cycle, what with fertility treatments, and viagra. well be having 70 year old parents

(i hate to think of all the babies, that would die becuase they couldnt squeeze through thier moms arthritic vagina!)

no no
i guess they should be able to enjoy it, but it shouldnt be the cause of a drug

Yeah, using such things arbitrarily is dumb.

YOU say old people sex is gross. Some people have a fetish for that. And let's not forget the old people DOING tohe act. I think they'd like it. Oh, and it's the natural cycle to die at 30, so....

Though I don't agree with 70 year ld parents. They can adopt. Though I also don't think the child COULD be carried to term, but in the future even, well, as you said. The're just too old. They can adopt.

FYI i was being sarcastic
but still i dont see why viagra is needed, if you have a donditoin, fine
but if your old, well then too bad

So no sex for you? That's not fair. Some people LIKE sex,e ven when they're older.

also abou your argument how humans are supposed to die at thirty. were also supposed to be only eating plants, but thats not happenin is it?

One, you said it wasn't natural to have sex at such an old age. Thus I said it's also natural to die at thirty.

Two, you have canines. Enough said.

Tyrong Kojy wrote:

Two, you have canines. Enough said.

This was beautiful, effective and laconic. Well done, Tyrong. Too bad it's a bit Off-topic.

He and I both kind of got off topic.

Tyrong Kojy wrote:

He and I both kind of got off topic.

I know, I was just lamenting that it was off-topic.

well then its also naturla for the cholestorol, that is in many meats, to clump on our arterys and kill us, oh wait thats not natural

we were bread on mostly a plant diet, sometimes meat. not the meat eating nation we ahve become

enviro wrote:

well then its also naturla for the cholestorol, that is in many meats, to clump on our arterys and kill us, oh wait thats not natural

I guess you know that there are two kinds of cholesterol and that one of them is even essential for, lets say, the synthesis of hormones.

enviro wrote:

we were bread on mostly a plant diet, sometimes meat. not the meat eating nation we ahve become

That's probably the reason why we would gather in groups to take down mammoths: our diet was mainly based on plants so we had to eliminate the competition.... We just ate their meat because we didn't want it to rot.

We need proteins, we need creatine and we need cholesterol, we're omnivores, nor herbivores.


Either way, this is offtopic.

protien is found it anything
ofcourse not in quantaties
i know of good and bad, but mostly bad is in meat

i meant that the blood clotting mechanism, the one used to clott outside cuts, can also start clumping on a cholersotrol build up in the artery or vein, casuing a total stop of blood

also humans could have eaten nuts and legumes, full of protien and fat

Yeah, as though beans and nuts were EVERWHERE.

Oh, and we used mammoth for other things, too. The bones. And of course the skin. We burned the fat. And I won't start with all the millions if urban legends of aphrodesiacs that have still persisted.

still HUMANS WERE BORN TO BE PLANT EATEARS
we evolved from apes, who also eat plants(or insects)
the circulatory system-not meant for meat
the fat disposal system(not meant for meat)
its obvoius from our nascestors and many of todays problems

enviro wrote:

protien is found it anything
ofcourse not in quantaties

Quantities are important. There is .3mg of protein in a cup of tea which means it has a negligible content of protein against the 24,000mg of protein found in 100g of Beef tenderloin.
You'd need to eat 3kg of Cantaloupes in a single meal just to get what 100g of Beef can give you protein-wise. You'd need 6 cans of beans to get the same.

And... where do you plan to get creatine from? Eggs? They have mopre cholesterol than meat mind me telling you.

envirus wrote:

i know of good and bad, but mostly bad is in meat

Good and bad are subjective terms.

An ectomorphic weight-lifter can hardly develop muscles without consuming meat. A vegan weight-lifter will have a fucking hard time in comparison to an onmivorous one.

enviro wrote:

i meant that the blood clotting mechanism, the one used to clott outside cuts, can also start clumping on a cholersotrol build up in the artery or vein, casuing a total stop of blood

So? There are several foods that provide with chemicals that reverse this.

enviro wrote:

also humans could have eaten nuts and legumes, full of protien and fat

Not if they wanted to be strong and develop, that's for sure. Once again, meat suffices dietary needs much better than legumes and/or nuts, not only for having considerably greater ammounts of protein, but because it also has creatine.

Well said, Zeal.

Oh, and we aren't supposed to eat meat?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7922120.stm

i dint not say not to eat meat, i siad we we(from an evolutionary stanpoint) were not evolved to eat it


we evoled form monkees, whose diet is mostly fruits, so we should have a body not made to handle as much meat.

i am not saying we shouldent
and i didnt say that all foods had the same quantity