Gay Marriage

The issue of gay marriage is a vastly controversial one in the United States, and I would like to hear your thoughts about it.

In particular, I would like you to answer the following questions:

1. Is homosexuality a sin/immoral?
2. Does homosexuality offend your sensibilities/morals?
3. Should gay couples receive the same benefits as heterosexual couples? (Tax breaks, etc.)

1. No.
2. No.
3. Yes.

I've never understood the controversy, to be honest. The real controversy, I think, is that there are people out there who actually give a shit - more than a shit, in fact! - about what gay couples, people who they'll never even meet, decide to do with their lives.

The controversy should be "Why do people have right to delimit others' rights?" A development of this controversy should be "Why should anyone have the faculty to determine whether a guy fucks consensually anothe rguy or not?"

1. No.
2. No.
3. Yes.

1.No
2.No
3.Yes

Yes, it should be legalized aswell.

1.Y
2.Y
3.N

comrade110397 wrote:

1.Y
2.Y
3.N

Kidding ooorr..?

Yeah, gay marriage should be legalized. I think It already is in Canada.

1. No
2. No
3. Yes

Canada got it legalized? That's good to hear, did the conservatives do that orrrr..

Anyways, it was here ligalized here in 2001, I think we were like the first country to do, so I thank the social-democrat/liberal/social-liberal for that. Which was the first without a christian democratic party, to bad it ended...

Comrade110397, if you're speaking seriously, why is that?

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Comrade110397, if you're speaking seriously, why is that?

teh big holy book of jesus forbids it. if the big holy book of jesus says no, then its gotta be wrong, right.

comrade110397 wrote:

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Comrade110397, if you're speaking seriously, why is that?

teh big holy book of jesus forbids it. if the big holy book of jesus says no, then its gotta be wrong, right.

get the fuck out.

You're obviously kidding comrade110397

No
No
Yes

Why not ban marriage all together?

Liche wrote:

Why not ban marriage all together?

Because people are free to practice certain rituals if they wish to so long as they don't affect third parties or imply coercion upon anyone.

Liche wrote:

No
No
Yes

Why not ban marriage all together?

I understand your sentiment, but I think that the burden of proof is usually required by those who suggest that we withhold ourselves from engaging in certain activities rather than those who suggest that we allow other individuals to freely and willingly join unions together in the manner of their own choosing, so long as they don't threaten the safety, well-being, or etc. of others.

So the question to me absolutely can't be "why not ban marriage," but, rather, it is "why ban marriage?"

Know what I mean?

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

You're obviously kidding comrade110397

Correct! Take this sticker for being the first one to get it right.

WWW wrote:

So the question to me absolutely can't be "why not ban marriage," but, rather, it is "why ban marriage?"

Know what I mean?

Beautifully said WWW. Why should anyone have the faculty to delimit whether a couple marries or not and how?

I actually voted no because all marirage should end, but, well, in other words, yes. You get what I mean. I simply clicked no.

Quote :

1. Is homosexuality a sin/immoral?

Nope.

Quote :

2. Does homosexuality offend your sensibilities/morals?

Nope.

Quote :

3. Should gay couples receive the same benefits as heterosexual couples? (Tax breaks, etc.)

Yep.

1 . Is this immoral to be heterosexual ? No. Same thing for homosexual attirance.
2 . Not at all. I'm myself bisexual.
3 . There should be no tax for anyone.

Gays have the same rights aa evryone, why?, becuse they just fucking do.
als I just read the bill of rights....

No person shall be held to answer for any capital.................. nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.


so tecnically communism is illegal.

and hutin, I agree no tax, except of buisness.

Matt, even I get that communism won't take your damn home away. If it does, you've got a bigger problem on your hands. Even in communism the police, or whatever equivalent we'd have since I know Zeal is gonna say something, would need a warrant to enter your home unless in direct prusuit of a criminal. Kinda like now.

privet property is EVRYTHING you own or in this case the "community"

and this is gay marrige thread not communism vs capitalism

Well, at least that's a thing we can all agree on, exept for the trolls.

Quote :

since I know Zeal is gonna say something

Since he seems to be busy at Uni, i suppose i'll be taking that task

mattabesta wrote:

privet property is EVRYTHING you own

Maybe to you, but in Marxist theory, private property is the means by which we subsist as a society held by capitalists. This is in complete contrast to personal property, which is the commodities that a person owns, the latter not being affected by a revolution.

But go ahead and keep ignoring the reality of it to suit your cappie-inspired agenda (i dunno how many times that needs repeating to you for you to get it).

mattabesta wrote:

privet property is EVRYTHING you own or in this case the "community"

and this is gay marrige thread not communism vs capitalism

Ad one will be allowed to keep all their junk, too! Stealing will still be illegal, and perpetrators prosecuted and attempted rehabilitation.

Quote :

This is in complete contrast to personal property, which is the commodities that a person owns, the latter not being affected by a revolution.

In other words, your crap. Game systems, TVs, books, tables, cars, chairs, clothes, and whatever the hell else.