List of resons why communism can't work.

Don't start a debate wether the resons are correct or NOT!.
resons:

1. 50 years of Anti-Communist propoganda from US scared people.
2. It din't reward pepole for theyer acevments.
3. The government did not (Doesn't) produce consumer goods, or those goods in high demand.
4.A few communist nation cant compete economically in a global capitalist world

-50 years of Anti-Communist propoganda from US scared people.

of course you have people changing there political views every 16 days

Where's the so called list and why shouldn't we debate it?

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Where's the so called list and why shouldn't we debate it?

your sopposed to add to it dummy

mattabesta wrote:

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Where's the so called list and why shouldn't we debate it?

your sopposed to add to it dummy

You didn't write that anywhere And Beware, I'll start debating

By the way it's "achievements"

-The government did not (Doesn't) produce consumer goods, or those goods in high demand.

Ah this will be pure gold, ha ha ha ha I'll help you adding the new ""reasons"" people add when you're not here Matthias, is that ok? I alreday did with carmen's

I'll start debating after 5 or perhaps 10 additions so be ready

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Ah this will be pure gold, ha ha ha ha I'll help you adding the new ""reasons"" people add when you're not here Matthias, is that ok? I alreday did with carmen's

I'll start debating after 5 or perhaps 10 additions so be ready

It's ok
I don't have time to check this topic evry day

ONE communist nation cant compete economically in a global capitalist world

Ryom wrote:

ONE communist nation cant compete economically in a global capitalist world

USSR and modern China were almost communist(socialist) nations. In USSR, the economy was very good at the time of Stalin, but after his death, the Party bureaucrats ruined the whole thing.

I would say USSR was crap at the time of Stalin and good during Lenins era, and the time AFTER Stalin.

Stalin exploited the people, just like imperialist nations.

People are the most important, not economy!

all im saying is that if Communism needs to work properly it needs more than one nation, if one communist nation were to stand alone it would need to be almost completely self sufficient as most capitalist nation would properly declare Veto.

Riddler wrote:

Ryom wrote:

ONE communist nation cant compete economically in a global capitalist world

USSR and modern China were almost communist(socialist) nations. In USSR, the economy was very good at the time of Stalin, but after his death, the Party bureaucrats ruined the whole thing.

He said: "u're like blind kinnen"

In a communist society, people who work get the advantage of being more respected and more loved for their hard work, and people who invent new things will be famous and have more friends.

PS: People who will be lazy will not be loved by others and will not have many friends

Ryom wrote:

ONE communist nation cant compete economically in a global capitalist world

USSR and modern China were almost communist(socialist) nations. In USSR, the economy was very good at the time of Stalin, but after his death, the Party bureaucrats ruined the whole thing.

I would say USSR was crap at the time of Stalin and good during Lenins era, and the time AFTER Stalin.

Stalin exploited the people, just like imperialist nations.

People are the most important, not economy!

Ryom wrote:

ONE communist nation cant compete economically in a global capitalist world

look at china; it's a communist state and it's a high producer of goods worldwide.
p.s. serach "spongebob in china"on youtube

Riddler wrote:

Ryom wrote:

ONE communist nation cant compete economically in a global capitalist world

USSR and modern China were almost communist(socialist) nations. In USSR, the economy was very good at the time of Stalin, but after his death, the Party bureaucrats ruined the whole thing.

I would say USSR was crap at the time of Stalin and good during Lenins era, and the time AFTER Stalin.

Stalin exploited the people, just like imperialist nations.

People are the most important, not economy!

tell that to china....

Kenzu wrote:

I would say USSR was crap at the time of Stalin and good during Lenins era, and the time AFTER Stalin.

Well, BEFORE Stalin, USSR wasn't much strong to resist agression from capitalist countries. AFTER Stalin, it was a big problem with the food and there wasn't much of a technological progress(not counting the space exploration). The only misadvantage of Stalin's era was the police burutality and Gulags, but that was basically before the WW II.

i wouldnt call China a communist state, even though they clame to be, yes China does produce consumer goods that are sold world wide, but the workers conditions are pure poo considering what we have in the western world, china has lost sight of it goal, making better conditions for the working man and women

Ryom wrote:

i wouldnt call China a communist state, even though they clame to be, yes China does produce consumer goods that are sold world wide, but the workers conditions are pure poo considering what we have in the western world, china has lost sight of it goal, making better conditions for the working man and women

yeah It's onlycommunist by the name