Elections in the USA

Who do you think will win?
Who do you support, and why?

Which candidate should win?

I don't know who will win but I really want someone who continues Bush's political agenda. Anyway I'm almost sure that either side will start a new military campaing: Democrats will go for Sudan and Republicans for Iran.

Why do you want them to continue like Bush?

I rather see USA become more civilised and socialist!

Kenzu wrote:

Why do you want them to continue like Bush?

I rather see USA become more civilised and socialist!

Because Bush represents the honest (for not saying cynical) objectives of US politics.

Kenzu wrote:

Why do you want them to continue like Bush?

I rather see USA become more civilised and socialist!

Yes all countries should socialice!

Patetine wrote:

Kenzu wrote:

Why do you want them to continue like Bush?

I rather see USA become more civilised and socialist!

Yes all countries should socialice!

Yes my friend... but... what does that have to do with the elections in USA?

I think there is a demokrat to win this election, so its either a black or a female prez. Either way its gonna be really interesting how they want to solve the iraq/afghanistan question. Hopefully someone will have the guts to ask the UN for forgiveness and help.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Patetine wrote:

Kenzu wrote:

Why do you want them to continue like Bush?

I rather see USA become more civilised and socialist!

Yes all countries should socialice!

Yes my friend... but... what does that have to do with the elections in USA?

Well, if democrats will win, it will get better. I hope Hillary wins and keeps the word of creating socialised health care! This would finally bring some prosperity to all the poor people in USA

Voice of Reason wrote:

I think there is a demokrat to win this election, so its either a black or a female prez. Either way its gonna be really interesting how they want to solve the iraq/afghanistan question. Hopefully someone will have the guts to ask the UN for forgiveness and help.

I think it is clear that the candidate from Democrats will either be Obama or Clinton. Although Hillary Clinton says she wants a change, many will see her as the continuation of the Clinton administration. Obama could be chosen, because he might truly represent the change, however he is of African origin and USA is still quite racist and Democrats would loose many votes to Republicans just because of racist issues.

we'll see, I'm definetely looking forward to these elections

It dosen't matter how will get elected hillary or obama althugh hillary has a better plan for health both of them haven´t really got a diffrent opinion of most things. Global warming: evert
Irak: retreat
Afganistan: retreat
Iran: Invade
Europe: forgett
Health: do some thing
Education: Improve

Why should they invade Iran???

Iran has a much better military than Iraq AND more men!

While Iraq has only 26.000.000 people
Iran has 70.000.000 people!

In a war China might send weapons to Iran.

Kenzu wrote:

Why should they invade Iran???

Iran has a much better military than Iraq AND more men!

While Iraq has only 26.000.000 people
Iran has 70.000.000 people!

In a war China might send weapons to Iran.

You think it can stop USA if they whant it?

comiescums wrote:

Kenzu wrote:

Why should they invade Iran???

Iran has a much better military than Iraq AND more men!

While Iraq has only 26.000.000 people
Iran has 70.000.000 people!

In a war China might send weapons to Iran.

You think it can stop USA if they whant it?

they have been stopped before

Quote :

they have been stopped before

and does they were stoped then they occupied iraq?Ofcourse i think Sadams deposition was good thing , but then they must leave.
As we now they are still there...

Kenzu wrote:

Why should they invade Iran???

Because they need to open Irani market.

Kenzu wrote:

Iran has a much better military than Iraq AND more men!

While Iraq has only 26.000.000 people
Iran has 70.000.000 people!

That's true, Iran's got much more military and technologic strength than Iraq, plus something Iraqi army didn't have: motivation, morale.

Kenzu wrote:

In a war China might send weapons to Iran.

China does send weapons to Iran in a daily basis.

comiescums wrote:

Quote :

they have been stopped before

and does they were stoped then they occupied iraq?Ofcourse i think Sadams deposition was good thing , but then they must leave.
As we now they are still there...

The only thing they did in Iraq was to depose Saddam, officially the haven't taken Iraq in control and thus haven't won the war. However, Iraqis always counted with lousy tactics and terribly poor morale.
Iran on its side has an army of 11 million religious fanats that employ guerrilla warfare and that is precisely US's main military obstacle in Iraq with a much smaller guerrilla... Now imagine them fighting simultaneously in Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan.

As for Saddam's deposition... is like if USSR had invaded Romania deposed Caucescu...

comiescums wrote:

Quote :

they have been stopped before

and does they were stoped then they occupied iraq?Ofcourse i think Sadams deposition was good thing , but then they must leave.
As we now they are still there...

I was not referring to Iraq

what were you referring to?

Kenzu wrote:

what were you referring to?

nvm, Vietnam and the bay of pigs is a poor example
so is 1812 due to he fact they weren't a world power

Im voting for Hilary because she seems to be the only((Excuse me if I shond terrible by saying this)) good, Democratic, White candidate in this.

Diogritor wrote:

Im voting for Hilary because she seems to be the only((Excuse me if I shond terrible by saying this)) good, Democratic, White candidate in this.

Wow.... now you seemed racist.... are you?

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Diogritor wrote:

Im voting for Hilary because she seems to be the only((Excuse me if I shond terrible by saying this)) good, Democratic, White candidate in this.

Wow.... now you seemed racist.... are you?

Not really but being raised in Georgia will..alter.. your veiw point. I do not say what I said based on personal veiws but the fact that some hick from West Virginia would assassinate Obama at his inauguration or something.

Diogritor wrote:

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Diogritor wrote:

Im voting for Hilary because she seems to be the only((Excuse me if I shond terrible by saying this)) good, Democratic, White candidate in this.

Wow.... now you seemed racist.... are you?

Not really but being raised in Georgia will..alter.. your veiw point. I do not say what I said based on personal veiws but the fact that some hick from West Virginia would assassinate Obama at his inauguration or something.

Well Bush may have inspired more hatred to many US people than black people to racists and no one has murdered him...

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Diogritor wrote:

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Diogritor wrote:

Im voting for Hilary because she seems to be the only((Excuse me if I shond terrible by saying this)) good, Democratic, White candidate in this.

Wow.... now you seemed racist.... are you?

Not really but being raised in Georgia will..alter.. your veiw point. I do not say what I said based on personal veiws but the fact that some hick from West Virginia would assassinate Obama at his inauguration or something.

Well Bush may have inspired more hatred to many US people than black people to racists and no one has murdered him...

That is because we would have Dick Cheney as a president then...

"the state of the union is...OH MY GOD A QUAIL" then we have a dead journalist on our hands :p

Diogritor wrote:

That is because we would have Dick Cheney as a president then...

"the state of the union is...OH MY GOD A QUAIL" then we have a dead journalist on our hands :p

And if Dick Cheney got killed... who would be next?