Wiki!!!!

some of the communists are strongly agains wikipedia altho it works like a communist system, you make a contributin, and if it is bad you get kicked, evrything is free, you take what you want and nobody asked what you did to deserv it.

but anyway, why the grudge agains wiki???

I have nothing against wikipedia, it rocks.

Pannekoek wrote:

I have nothing against wikipedia, it rocks.

thank you. very, very much.

In theory wikipedia shouldn't work but in practice it does.

Pannekoek wrote:

In theory wikipedia shouldn't work but in practice it does.

why, not, donations, are easy, with 2,000,000 dayly usesrs SOMEONE will donate in the end.

I meant that it seems like the info wouldn't be accurate because anyone can write anything they want, but really it's pretty accurate.

Pannekoek wrote:

I meant that it seems like the info wouldn't be accurate because anyone can write anything they want, but really it's pretty accurate.

yeah, the nerds REALLY do make a contribution to this world.

I am a nerd. Be nice to nerds because one day you'll be working for one.

Pannekoek wrote:

I am a nerd. Be nice to nerds because one day you'll be working for one.

LOL I'm a nerd too, I had an Iq test in the 3rd grade and I'm like 145 something.
mats 9
history 9
chemistry and bio 10
re 10
you get the pic, and I'm on my classes, what's it called when you like sit and answere qestions before the othere team?

Lol I'm on that too. Here its called scholastic bowl. I'm the capitain.

Pannekoek wrote:

Lol I'm on that too. Here its called scholastic bowl. I'm the capitain.

lol were in the 8th last teams and were for the 3rd time up agains 10th graders, wich will be cruched .btw I'm 8th grade.
I doubt I will win there is a kid who took an exam wich is mad for 19yearolds when he was 12 and got 8,5!!!!!

I haven't heard any arguments against Wikipedia except from bad educators; things like Knoll are the capitalist schemes.

Wikipedia sucks. Encyclopedia Dramatica for the win. Also, www.wikicheatia.com

I OWN THAT LAST ONE YAY!

thats a broken link

Whoopsies... www.wikicheatia.net

I forgot what my own site is.

irony much?

I like wikipedia, except for the Slovak section, which has most anti-communist admins I have ever seen. The whole section is anti-communist and if you try to put accurate definitions, like for example what is communism and that China and DPRK are not communist states they will ban you.

It works only as long as there is a balance of admins and they are not one sided.

I doubt it could be as one sided as conservatipedia.

Kenzu wrote:

I like wikipedia, except for the Slovak section, which has most anti-communist admins I have ever seen. The whole section is anti-communist and if you try to put accurate definitions, like for example what is communism and that China and DPRK are not communist states they will ban you.

It works only as long as there is a balance of admins and they are not one sided.

well you could try to find superior admins or get incontact with staff.

Wiki's good, but I don't trust it much.

Riddler wrote:

Wiki's good, but I don't trust it much.

why not?

mattabesta wrote:

Riddler wrote:

Wiki's good, but I don't trust it much.

why not?

Because it's written by ordinary people, not offical scientists or historians.

Quote :

not offical scientists

Yuh huh, I write in it.

Riddler wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

Riddler wrote:

Wiki's good, but I don't trust it much.

why not?

Because it's written by ordinary people, not offical scientists or historians.

dosen't matter it's sorces are from reliabel sites wich are written by experts on the subject.

Yeah it's not like peole just make it up. They get it from other sources and post the sources for all to see.