| | | Libertarian/Capitalist group | |
| |
| Agree? | | Agree, should be a group | | 60% | [ 9 ] | | Disagree, should not be a group | | 33% | [ 5 ] | | Other, will post about it | | 6% | [ 1 ] |
| | Total Votes : 15 | | | | Cancel vote |
| | Author | Message |
|---|
nillerz Arrested

Posts: 288 Join date: 2008-04-02 Age: 19 Location: Western NY
 | Subject: Re: Libertarian/Capitalist group Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:39 am | |
| You guys just don't know politics at all. You've got all these bizarre theories and categories but you don't actually know anything about politics. FACTS: -liberal = left Liberal means "Liberal use of government" or in the USA, "Liberal use of the elastic clause" -Conservative = right Conservative means "Conservative use of government" or in the USA, "Conservative use of the elastic clause". that means LIBERAL = LARGE GOV'T and CONSERVATIVE = SMALL GOVERNMENT. Capitalism is, essentially, default. If you take away government, for the most part, people will operate capitalistically. People will trade services for product, Liberals want this trade controlled, LIBERALLY, and conservatives want them controlled CONSERVATIVELY, ie, only when absolutely necessary. Communism negates capitalism, it takes away the whole "normal operation of how things worked for thousands of years" and replaces it with a single giant monopoly, essentially a controlled economy absolutely. Communism is as far left as you can get. Anachy is a total lack of control of the economy. It is far right, past where most conservatives find safe. Then there's authoritarian versus libertarian Statists believe in total control over your life. Communists are statist whether or not they want to accept this fact. Socialism is close to statism but preserves some elements of freedom Then there are moderates, reasonable amount of control Then there are libertarians, low level of control Finally, anarchists, no control. Why do you guys find this system so hard? _________________  | Liche wrote: | | Nillerz is the man |
| RedSoviet wrote: | | I make you DIE for what i belief |
|
|  | | Zealot_Kommunizma Hero of the World Republic
Posts: 5209 Join date: 2007-12-06 Age: 21 Location: Mexico/Russia/Worl
 | Subject: Re: Libertarian/Capitalist group Sun Nov 23, 2008 2:10 am | |
| | nillerz wrote: | | You guys just don't know politics at all. You've got all these bizarre theories and categories but you don't actually know anything about politics. |
We just use an exounitedstatian political scale.
There's a biaxial graphic. The X (horizontal) axis is economics' axis and the Y (vertical) axis is the libertarian/authoritarian axis.
In the axis X the closer to the right the more individualist the economy is. That is, private ownership of the means of production, individuals means of subsistance, market, etc. The closer ro left the more collectivist the economy is, that is less to no private property over means of production, collective means of subsistance.
This horizontal axis is divided in Two main sections: Socialist and Capitalist/Marketist economies. Socialist is left and Capitalist/Marketist is right.
These two sections have subdivisions as well.
The Capitalist side is divided in two: Right and Left wing capitalisms.
A right wing capitalism would be a capitalism in which the economy is predominantly individualist and the means of production can be owned by individuals. The economy is focused towards the satisfaction of the owners' of the means of production interests and their benefit. The main target of this economy is individual profit instead of collective wellbeing. Examples of this are the USA, Japan, EU, Russia, Mexico, etc.
A left wing capitalism implies a more centralized economy in which private ownership of the means of production is more limited or doesn't exist whatsoever. The economy's target is mainly collective social welfare instead of profit. Examples of this would be USSR, Cuba, NK etc.
Both economies are run by capital and market with the difference that one is centrally planned in order to theoretically suffice societal needs and distribute economic profit as evenly as possible while the other is focused towards the satisfaction of the owners' of the means of prodction interests.
Left wing capitalisms, when too extreme, are oo regultaed to substain themselves and are often very unstable and tend to copletely collapse during crisis.
The Socialist economic side, for pragmatic uses, can be divided in Socialist and Communist when the later means just a "perefctioned" version of the former. In this economic model there is no state, nor market, nor trade. The economy is entirely run by the workers in a democratic fashion and the production is set to suffice all societal needs.
The Y axis determines wether a system is authoritarian or not. The upper it is located the more authoritarian. Totalitarian systems would go up while more liberal systems woulr go down being anarchism in the extreme low.
The more liberal the less coercion enforced the more authoritarian the more coercion a certain group excerts over other.
In the case of socialist economics the theoretical authoritarian forms of socialism would imply large minorities having the ability to support a state to enforce the most efficient possible socialist economy on all of the society. The system would follow a socialist economy but would be authoritarian. Once again, this is just a theoretical system.
In case of the previous kind of theoretical socialist economy being taken into account, the whole Socialist side of the axis X becomes solely horizontal and the right wing becomes authoritarian while the left wing are the libertarians.
| nillerz wrote: | Communism negates capitalism, it takes away the whole "normal operation of how things worked for thousands of years" and replaces it with a single giant monopoly, essentially a controlled economy absolutely. Communism is as far left as you can get. |
A monopoly of all the workers which means everyone rules the economy collectively.
| nillerz wrote: | Anachy is a total lack of control of the economy. It is far right, past where most conservatives find safe. |
This is wrong as many anarchist comrades will point out.
| nillerz wrote: | Then there's authoritarian versus libertarian
Statists believe in total control over your life. Communists are statist whether or not they want to accept this fact. |
Being this false as communism implies democratic olective self rule. That is no one gives a shit about what doesn't affect other parties but yourself.
| nillerz wrote: | Socialism is close to statism but preserves some elements of freedom |
Defining socialism as...?
| nillerz wrote: | Then there are moderates, reasonable amount of control |
"Reasonable" is a fairly subjective term.
| nillerz wrote: |
Finally, anarchists, no control. |
Unless you're talking about Bakuninists or crimethinc, who definitely do not compose the backbone nor the largest ammount of anarchists, you're wrong.
Most Anarchists would definitely be in favour of a collective control of economy and regulation of things like murder, rape, destruction of infrastructure and so on.
| nillerz wrote: | Why do you guys find this system so hard? |
Not hard, simply absolutely non workable.
Last edited by Zealot_Kommunizma on Sun Nov 23, 2008 6:17 am; edited 1 time in total |
|  | | WeiWuWei New Party Member
Posts: 595 Join date: 2008-04-14 Age: 20 Location: Failida
 | Subject: Re: Libertarian/Capitalist group Sun Nov 23, 2008 2:52 am | |
| | nillerz wrote: | | liberal = left |
You lost me here. I am a Leftist, and most people here are Leftists. None of us are Liberals, and we'd be offended if you called us that.
Liberalism, in a classical sense, has always emphasized individualism. Individualism has always been, unquestionably, right-wing. The right-wing has always put its cultural emphasis on the individual, whereas the left-wing has always put its cultural emphasis on the community at large.
Liberalism has always supported the protection of private property and the free market. It always has. These are core elements of right-wing economics.
Milton Friedman was a "Liberal". Friedrich Hayek was a "Liberal". Malthus was a "Liberal". I mean, really. Even Adam Smith was a Liberal. Is Adam Smith a leftist? Are any of these guys?
The thing about it is that Conservatism is really just the retarded younger cousin of Liberalism. Both of them are right-wing in that support markets. Where they differ is that Liberalism tends to be more Libertarian and Conservatism tends to be more Authoritarian.
Think of Thomas Hobbes as a classical Conservative and Adam Smith as a classical Liberal. Both supported free markets and free enterprise; where they differed is the role of government in peoples' lives.
---
As an aside, Anarchism absolutely does not imply lack of control in economic affairs, and to suggest that makes me think that you're just trying to troll us. Anarchists are classically Libertarian in that we respect the sovereignty of the individual. This much is consistent in every branch of Anarchism. Where some - if not most - Anarchists differ is that we support a series of decentralized economic planning. Economic planning is the back-bone of left-wing economics. That is why some strands of Anarchism - Anarchocommunism, Anarchosyndicalism, Libertarian Socialism - are left-wing, and that is why Liberalism is right-wing, since Liberalism inherently implies lack of control over the markets.
Right-wing = no economic control. Left-wing = economic control.
This is shit you can find on Wikipedia in like two seconds._________________  |
|  | | Zeronos ZEK in siberian gulag

Posts: 244 Join date: 2008-07-03 Age: 16 Location: Tennessee
 | Subject: Re: Libertarian/Capitalist group Sun Nov 23, 2008 2:59 am | |
| And he calls us clueless...before saying an utter load of crap. |
|  | | nillerz Arrested

Posts: 288 Join date: 2008-04-02 Age: 19 Location: Western NY
 | Subject: Re: Libertarian/Capitalist group Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:48 am | |
| no. LIBERAL = Liberal government. Liberal means LOTS. Words man, words! Conservative = Conservative government. Less government, government only where needed. This is simple stuff, folks. btw I tldr'd most of your stuff I can't read that much bs, I'm sorry I have my limits. You don't know what words mean. You guys just dont. I tried explaining it. You just don't get it. You are clueless. Completely clueless. You are fine examples of how public schooling has failed. Liberal isn't a complicated word. It means plenty. If you apply liberal amounts of ketchup to a burger you are adding alot of ketchup. If you apply ketchup conservatively, you add a little but not too much. Also why are we this far off-topic? The fact is that people think this is a good idea, the polls indicate it's supported, they don't need to post about it. Should votes only be given to the biggest loudmouths? The quiet ones can have opinions too, you know. _________________  | Liche wrote: | | Nillerz is the man |
| RedSoviet wrote: | | I make you DIE for what i belief |
|
|  | | WeiWuWei New Party Member
Posts: 595 Join date: 2008-04-14 Age: 20 Location: Failida
 | |  | | Liche Chairman of the Supreme Council

Posts: 4243 Join date: 2008-01-29 Age: 16 Location: USA-Virginia
 | Subject: Re: Libertarian/Capitalist group Thu Nov 27, 2008 5:02 am | |
| Nillerz is talking about the word Liberal. Not the political expression. |
|  | | nillerz Arrested

Posts: 288 Join date: 2008-04-02 Age: 19 Location: Western NY
 | Subject: Re: Libertarian/Capitalist group Thu Nov 27, 2008 5:09 am | |
| Liberal didn't always mean "Support female and minority rights". Affirmative action programs intrude on business owners rights to run their business however they like. It's LIBERAL use of government. That's why dems cater to feminist and black rights groups. _________________  | Liche wrote: | | Nillerz is the man |
| RedSoviet wrote: | | I make you DIE for what i belief |
|
|  | | Zeronos ZEK in siberian gulag

Posts: 244 Join date: 2008-07-03 Age: 16 Location: Tennessee
 | Subject: Re: Libertarian/Capitalist group Thu Nov 27, 2008 5:25 am | |
| | nillerz wrote: | no. LIBERAL = Liberal government. Liberal means LOTS. Words man, words! Conservative = Conservative government. Less government, government only where needed. This is simple stuff, folks.
btw I tldr'd most of your stuff I can't read that much bs, I'm sorry I have my limits. You don't know what words mean. You guys just dont. I tried explaining it. You just don't get it. You are clueless. Completely clueless. You are fine examples of how public schooling has failed. Liberal isn't a complicated word. It means plenty. If you apply liberal amounts of ketchup to a burger you are adding alot of ketchup. If you apply ketchup conservatively, you add a little but not too much. Also why are we this far off-topic?
The fact is that people think this is a good idea, the polls indicate it's supported, they don't need to post about it. Should votes only be given to the biggest loudmouths? The quiet ones can have opinions too, you know. |
You're thinking of this in completely the wrong mindset. American liberalism=/=liberalism.
Liberalism, traditionally, is generally best personified by what you're describing conservatism as. The typical US-centric political spectrum is not universal. Deal with it. |
|  | | nillerz Arrested

Posts: 288 Join date: 2008-04-02 Age: 19 Location: Western NY
 | Subject: Re: Libertarian/Capitalist group Thu Nov 27, 2008 8:33 am | |
| I'm talking English. Do you speak it? Liberal means "Liberal". In the US it also means "Rights for minorities and women". This doesn't mean it's about freedom, it's not about freedom anywhere, really. _________________  | Liche wrote: | | Nillerz is the man |
| RedSoviet wrote: | | I make you DIE for what i belief |
|
|  | | WeiWuWei New Party Member
Posts: 595 Join date: 2008-04-14 Age: 20 Location: Failida
 | Subject: Re: Libertarian/Capitalist group Thu Nov 27, 2008 2:00 pm | |
| Okay, let me try going about this in another way. If you're so sure that Liberalism is a left-wing ideology, then what clear comparisons can you make between it and Socialism? I should just also mention that your idea that Liberalism is "not about freedom" is totally fucking wrong. I don't know how else to say that. It's wrong. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberalism/ - check out this link and read the first section about Liberalism and the debate about liberty. Then read the part about "New Liberalism", which is what you're talking about. _________________  |
|  | | nillerz Arrested

Posts: 288 Join date: 2008-04-02 Age: 19 Location: Western NY
 | Subject: Re: Libertarian/Capitalist group Thu Nov 27, 2008 3:47 pm | |
| Socialism is an extreme form of liberalism. Here's the thing: You can argue that liberalism was set up to protect freedom, maybe it does in your country, who knows? The fact remains, however, if you look at the Democratic party in the US, aka "liberals", you see programs to expand government programs, to increase taxes, and other things. Anything the government gets involved in, from highways to corporate bailouts, increases its size, increases its power, and increases the dynamic ways in which it can fuck over those it has power over. If in your country, Liberal means "protect the free market", then I'll concede that I'm a liberal: in YOUR country. I'm not in your country and I refuse to be labelled as something like that. Also, personal liberty is not compatible with large government. _________________  | Liche wrote: | | Nillerz is the man |
| RedSoviet wrote: | | I make you DIE for what i belief |
|
|  | | Zeronos ZEK in siberian gulag

Posts: 244 Join date: 2008-07-03 Age: 16 Location: Tennessee
 | Subject: Re: Libertarian/Capitalist group Thu Nov 27, 2008 9:39 pm | |
| | nillerz wrote: | Socialism is an extreme form of liberalism.
Here's the thing: You can argue that liberalism was set up to protect freedom, maybe it does in your country, who knows? The fact remains, however, if you look at the Democratic party in the US, aka "liberals", you see programs to expand government programs, to increase taxes, and other things. Anything the government gets involved in, from highways to corporate bailouts, increases its size, increases its power, and increases the dynamic ways in which it can fuck over those it has power over. If in your country, Liberal means "protect the free market", then I'll concede that I'm a liberal: in YOUR country. I'm not in your country and I refuse to be labelled as something like that.
Also, personal liberty is not compatible with large government. |
That's it, I'm done. Arguing with you is like arguing with a brick wall. You have no idea what you're talking about, you won't be rid of your delusion that your US-centric, economic-centric notion of the political spectrum is correct, so I'm going to put my time to much better use. |
|  | | WeiWuWei New Party Member
Posts: 595 Join date: 2008-04-14 Age: 20 Location: Failida
 | Subject: Re: Libertarian/Capitalist group Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:12 am | |
| | nillerz wrote: | Socialism is an extreme form of liberalism.
Here's the thing: You can argue that liberalism was set up to protect freedom, maybe it does in your country, who knows? The fact remains, however, if you look at the Democratic party in the US, aka "liberals", you see programs to expand government programs, to increase taxes, and other things. Anything the government gets involved in, from highways to corporate bailouts, increases its size, increases its power, and increases the dynamic ways in which it can fuck over those it has power over. If in your country, Liberal means "protect the free market", then I'll concede that I'm a liberal: in YOUR country. I'm not in your country and I refuse to be labelled as something like that.
Also, personal liberty is not compatible with large government. |
I hate to tell you, man, but I'm an American.
I'm just saying that, historically, Liberalism usually refers to how we have been defining it within left-wing circles: a right-wing ideology that is based on markets and individual freedom. And, in some parts of the world, it still retains that meaning. But we in the U.S. really took the language and screwed it up here. I think if you take a look at some of the political parties around the world that would be described as "right-wing", a lot of them tend to refer to themselves as "Liberal". A few good examples are the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy from the Netherlands, and the Liberal Party from Iceland.
American Liberalism is a strange thing, but I wouldn't suggest that it is Socialist - nor would I think that Socialism is an extreme form of Liberalism. It still has its tendencies towards market solutions, and it has always supported individualism; from an American historical perspective, we see this mostly in the Liberal opposition to labor unions during the late 1800's and the early 1900's. Labor unions were maligned by Liberals as being collectivist - i.e. anti-individualist - and against competitive markets.
American Liberalism is a weird thing, and I think it's silly to dogmatically say that it's either left-wing or right-wing. It has elements of both, just as most other things do, but I would say that it is more right-wing than anything else.
Check out John Maynard Keynes' General Theory. It's a pretty thorough account of the economic system most American Liberals adhere to._________________  |
|  | | Stos New Party Member

Posts: 545 Join date: 2008-09-14
 | Subject: Re: Libertarian/Capitalist group Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:56 pm | |
| | nillerz wrote: | Socialism is an extreme form of liberalism.
Here's the thing: You can argue that liberalism was set up to protect freedom, maybe it does in your country, who knows? The fact remains, however, if you look at the Democratic party in the US, aka "liberals", you see programs to expand government programs, to increase taxes, and other things. Anything the government gets involved in, from highways to corporate bailouts, increases its size, increases its power, and increases the dynamic ways in which it can fuck over those it has power over. If in your country, Liberal means "protect the free market", then I'll concede that I'm a liberal: in YOUR country. I'm not in your country and I refuse to be labelled as something like that. |
...The Democrats are right-wing conservatives. |
|  | | nillerz Arrested

Posts: 288 Join date: 2008-04-02 Age: 19 Location: Western NY
 | Subject: Re: Libertarian/Capitalist group Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:11 pm | |
| Okay, arguing about this won't get us anywhere, and since it is officially several weeks later, I'm just going to say that I think there should be a group that -Supports a free market -Supports a free individual -Supports a restricted government -Supports minarchal taxation -Doesn't support anarchy none of the current groups actually are that. 9 people think we should have this group I've described in my posts. 4 say no. I think it's very obvious that the group should exist. White group, please!  _________________  | Liche wrote: | | Nillerz is the man |
| RedSoviet wrote: | | I make you DIE for what i belief |
|
|  | | | | Libertarian/Capitalist group | |
|
| Page 3 of 3 | Goto page : 1, 2, 3 |
| | Permissions of this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |