VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS

**comrade110397** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Sat Feb 28, 2009 9:37 pm

CoolKidX wrote:

comrade110397 wrote:

Kenzu wrote:

All of you get 7 days ban. Remember that people who break WR rules cannot moderate our forum, and all of you will be punished! (Except for Zealot, because he is an admin and thus above the law. It is impossible to give a ban on admins. I would have to strip him of his admin rights.)

enviro was Banned 18 feb - 28 feb

PS: If you people are so sensitive that you have to insult back if someone insults you, even if you know that I will ban you, then it is your choice. My advice to you is that if you cannot control yourselves and get insulted so easily, you shouldn't visit forums.

No one is above the law. Not even god himself.

Seconded!!

I been wondering about this since i got here. What does seconded mean?

_________________
PROLETERIANS OF THE WORLD, UNITE!

I ARE EMPEROR OF CATKIND

Kenzu, this post ISNT spam.

**Zealot_Kommunizma** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Sun Mar 01, 2009 12:48 am

comrade110397 wrote:

I been wondering about this since i got here. What does seconded mean?

That you agree completely with the post you second.

_________________

**comrade110397** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:29 am

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

comrade110397 wrote:

I been wondering about this since i got here. What does seconded mean?

That you agree completely with the post you second.

Thanks.

_________________
PROLETERIANS OF THE WORLD, UNITE!

I ARE EMPEROR OF CATKIND

Kenzu, this post ISNT spam.

**Alek4A** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:21 am

enviro wrote:

well im sorry you feel that way alek4, but so far I am staying. Is the only reason you hate me cuz I sued to troll?

Cuz i never really found a reason to hate you

i dont think your serious about politics and was deeply offended by your insult on zach's girlfriend (shes my friend too)

your presence isnt giving this site anything valuable

_________________

**Zealot_Kommunizma** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Sun Mar 01, 2009 4:37 pm

Alek4A wrote:

i dont think your serious about politics

I second this.

Alek4A wrote:

and was deeply offended by your insult on zach's girlfriend (shes my friend too)

This is completely understandable.

Alek4A wrote:

your presence isnt giving this site anything valuable

I second this. Enviro's "political profile" entitled "the closet" quite reveals this.

_________________

**enviro** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Sun Mar 01, 2009 5:25 pm

i guess it does
but still am i taking anything away?

_________________
why do i need a sig

**Zealot_Kommunizma** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Sun Mar 01, 2009 5:28 pm

enviro wrote:

i guess it does
but still am i taking anything away?

Space, time and dignity. You're literally making fun of these condescendent guys.

_________________

**enviro** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Sun Mar 01, 2009 6:25 pm

making fun of??
space??

well you guys cnah ave as many memebrs as you like.

and making fun of, i guess. but then kenzu and you shouldnt have let me join in the first place

_________________
why do i need a sig

**Zealot_Kommunizma** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Sun Mar 01, 2009 9:59 pm

enviro wrote:

making fun of??
space??

well you guys cnah ave as many memebrs as you like.

The space you occupy is misused. the problem is that so far people is democratically protecting it.

enviro wrote:

and making fun of, i guess. but then kenzu and you shouldnt have let me join in the first place

If for me it was I'd ban you right away. Actually just for what you said right now. You agreed that you're making fun of the people here that support your stay. And how do you make fun? You manipulate them into defending your stay while you mock at them.

_________________

**enviro** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:27 am

but it takes some knowingness to manipulate poeple doesnt it??

and i dont make fun of people who support me, thats why the do

_________________
why do i need a sig

**Zealot_Kommunizma** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:11 am

enviro wrote:

but it takes some knowingness to manipulate poeple doesnt it??

and i dont make fun of people who support me, thats why the do

They do because they don't notice.

_________________

**enviro** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Tue Mar 03, 2009 3:02 am

but im smart for capitlizing on thier ignorance
either way im atleast as smart as a politician

_________________
why do i need a sig

**Zealot_Kommunizma** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:39 am

enviro wrote:

but im smart for capitlizing on thier ignorance
either way im atleast as smart as a politician

You should feel embarrassed.

_________________

**enviro** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Wed Mar 04, 2009 12:18 am

i shouldn ot, i dont capitalize on them. they trust me to change and i will
its called being friendly zel, you should try it
nah im joking
they just like me and like second chances
(apparetnly sarcasm is hard to see on type)

_________________
why do i need a sig

**Black_Cross** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:34 pm

Kenzu wrote:

[color=orange]I counted the votes. Here are the results:
(There is a new thread for the voting 2nd round Liche and Black Cross)
The winner will become supermod and after probatory period, if both admins agree will become a lifelong admin.

1st
Liche 21 votes

2nd
Black Cross 18 votes

3rd
Lilith 11 votes

4th
Tyrlop 7 votes

I was banned, so i couldn't bring attention to this earlier. I woulda thought that, given the fact that this is your site, you probably woulda taken your time with this, and maybe counted the votes twice to be sure (especially given the fact that your count doesn't match the one already posted), cos your count is wrong, even by your own standards... I was wrong.

_________________
"A market economy must comprise all elements of industry including labor, land and money [...] But labor and land are no other than the human beings themselves of which every society consists and the natural surroundings in which it exists. To include them in the market mechanism means to subordinate the substance of society itself."
--Karl Polanyi--

**CoolKidX** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Sat Mar 07, 2009 12:24 am

@BC

You were banned?
Why?

_________________
"In war, there are no unwounded soldiers."--Jose Narosky

"A pessimist is one who makes difficulties of his opportunities; an optimist is one who makes opportunities of his difficulties." --Reginald Mansell

Eazy-er Said Than Dunn

**kismet** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:19 am

no wonder you guys have thousands of posts, this was to be a VOTE thread and getting into page 5 and the SPAM you guys have done and going off-topic and so forth.... need you really comment on EVERY SINGLE REPLY?

Not even a month ago I was farming Lilith (she wasn't in WR) and she's up for section admin? Too funny.

Is there not a way to just set up a poll and be done with it instead of listening to this constant blather in a VOTE thread?

**Black_Cross** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:54 am

CoolKidX wrote:

@BC

You were banned?
Why?

Cos Kenzu's sensitive about being called fuhrer. I thought i was being accurate in the description, considering his actions as an admin, but apparently i was wrong, so it was an insult.

_________________
"A market economy must comprise all elements of industry including labor, land and money [...] But labor and land are no other than the human beings themselves of which every society consists and the natural surroundings in which it exists. To include them in the market mechanism means to subordinate the substance of society itself."
--Karl Polanyi--

**Zealot_Kommunizma** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Sat Mar 07, 2009 8:51 am

kismet wrote:

no wonder you guys have thousands of posts, this was to be a VOTE thread and getting into page 5 and the SPAM you guys have done and going off-topic and so forth.... need you really comment on EVERY SINGLE REPLY?

Yes we have to discuss everything here, that's how democracy ought to work.

kismet wrote:

Not even a month ago I was farming Lilith (she wasn't in WR) and she's up for section admin? Too funny.

What's the damned relevance of this comment? Lilith has been here for quite a while and is a well-liked member. Mind me telling you Aderan Wars is rather irrelevant to this forum: it was created quite recently and most of the community composing WR came firstly to WR, many simply started joining Aderan Wars after its creation.

kismet wrote:

Is there not a way to just set up a poll and be done with it instead of listening to this constant blather in a VOTE thread?

No.

Polls don't work as they're vulnerable to sockpuppets.

Else, why would you actually care about this? You barely come to this forum and most of your interventions have been pointless critiques based on insufficient information and familiarization with the site and, when confronted, you simply dodge.

And if you're so bothered about this vote thread going off-topic then why fomenting that further?

Also the fact that you cannot vote is worth mentioning. According to your logic and if you were to keep congruous you wouldn't even post in this thread; all your interventions would be off-topic.

Damn I hate to seem so rude, and specially to a woman, but you simply get on my nerves.

_________________

**kismet** · Subject: Re: VOTE YOUR NEW SECTION-ADMINS Sat Mar 07, 2009 10:41 am

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

kismet wrote:

no wonder you guys have thousands of posts, this was to be a VOTE thread and getting into page 5 and the SPAM you guys have done and going off-topic and so forth.... need you really comment on EVERY SINGLE REPLY?

Yes we have to discuss everything here, that's how democracy ought to work.

kismet wrote:

Not even a month ago I was farming Lilith (she wasn't in WR) and she's up for section admin? Too funny.

What's the damned relevance of this comment? Lilith has been here for quite a while and is a well-liked member. Mind me telling you Aderan Wars is rather irrelevant to this forum: it was created quite recently and most of the community composing WR came firstly to WR, many simply started joining Aderan Wars after its creation.

kismet wrote:

Is there not a way to just set up a poll and be done with it instead of listening to this constant blather in a VOTE thread?

No.

Polls don't work as they're vulnerable to sockpuppets.

Else, why would you actually care about this? You barely come to this forum and most of your interventions have been pointless critiques based on insufficient information and familiarization with the site and, when confronted, you simply dodge.

And if you're so bothered about this vote thread going off-topic then why fomenting that further?

Also the fact that you cannot vote is worth mentioning. According to your logic and if you were to keep congruous you wouldn't even post in this thread; all your interventions would be off-topic.

Damn I hate to seem so rude, and specially to a woman, but you simply get on my nerves.

Trust me, the feeling is quite mutual. Others have posted in here as well that were unable to vote, as you and others talk about a number of things irrelevant to the vote, the number of posts someone has should be inconsequential to someone posting in this thread.

Perhaps I get on your nerves because I don't bow down to you and say "oooh, sorry for my opinions and impressions." Perhaps you're intimidated by intelligent and opinionated women. Perhaps you just don't like it when someone doesn't follow your orders. Others have posted comments that you didn't demand proof or anything else from. But because I don't like BC much, you dislike me. I like Kenzu and Sara, does that make me your enemy as well? Perhaps it might be because I haven't posted my political affiliations.

Whether or not this was before or after aderan is also irrelevant. It's the link given for the alliance, period. If you didn't want people from there, the link shouldn't be given. Especially those who don't quite share your political views? How would you know?

Word games are fun. Semantics are still valid. Small differences are the reasons there are so many denominations within Protestants and Muslims. Semantics? Tell a Southern Baptist they're just like the Methodists and see how fast their backs go up. Tell a Shiite they're the same as a Sunni and you might live through it. Small differences are the reasons for being and debate. I have not called you anything nor have I put you down for any reason other than you just don't like me. Because of....... what? You think I'm someone else too? You're out of your gourd if that's it. Because I didn't state and quote 15 of the thousands of posts where I felt BC was being a bully? Because I didn't post a few of the threads where lithe has flip-flopped on his statements of belief? Others have said much the same, but I don't see you calling them out. Perhaps a review of why you don't like me would be in order. I'm not stupid, far from it. I'd prefer a Utopia, but that's not going to happen as long as people have hate in their hearts. I don't HATE BC or lithe, just merely stated my own opinions and thoughts. You clearly took a dislike to me from the first post I made outside of the "pioneering" thread. Because of your actions and words, the feeling has become mutual; I don't like you, but I don't hate you for it. You're as welcome to your opinion as I would think I am... but I apparently am not. Especially after Kenzu backed me up only a couple of posts later. Impressions are made. Be it from 1 post or 300, the impression can still leave a bitter taste in your mouth.

As far as Lilith? I like her. I have absolutely nothing against her. Just found it funny as this *IS* the forum for the Alliance WR in aderan and she's new to it yet still being considered for a higher position within the alliance through the forums. Those who are in positions of power on here are higher in aderan, are they not? Not newcomers in other words?

To reply to another thread as I don't feel like surfing around on this laptop (it's being a bit laggy at the moment):
My question about age is valid. Someone at 14/15/16 doesn't have the world (life) experience to fully grasp a political stance they're arguing. Nor do they fully comprehend other forms of government. If it's the only thing they've known, it's entirely possible they still don't understand how that particular form of government/living falls in with the rest of the world or other forms. I'd be more inclined to believe someone who is 20+ that they know more about the political systems than I would a 14 year old. Seventeen is still iffy as well. Not saying these individuals aren't intelligent, quite the opposite for them to make the arguments they're making. But it still doesn't say they understand how it fits in with world views. No, I don't believe communism began in the soviet union. Smile

You may or may not like what I've posted here, but I sincerely hope I've answered or at least filled you in a bit on what makes me tick.