AK vs M16

Kalashnikova of course

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

yeah the ak is a lot more practical and it is rediculus theat ther hasn´t been a major leap in assult riffels for 50 years.

0.7mm is not pecil lead 0.07mm is pencil.

you win ak is better.

but wahat about this eurofighter vs F-35 anyonje wann debate that?

Why don't you start that thread? Anyway I go more for the Eurofighter.

lol
F-35 is a generation ahed of the eurofigheter.

Ah who cares about fighter planes, it depends on the training really. XD Like everything else in the world.

Back on topic.

List some of the M16s failures and the reason why you dislike the gun. Or, if you like the M16, tell us why.

Ditto for the Kalashnikova. :B

Jeiro Sijakeuigwan wrote:

Ah who cares about fighter planes, it depends on the training really. XD Like everything else in the world.

Back on topic.

List some of the M16s failures and the reason why you dislike the gun. Or, if you like the M16, tell us why.

Ditto for the Kalashnikova. :B

m16 is faster, morer accuret and shotes longer.

mattabesta wrote:

m16 is faster, morer accuret and shotes longer.

*more accurate, shoots

mattabesta wrote:

m16 is faster, morer accuret and shotes longer.

What? That's it? That's all you can come up with? =/

lol, tell my father that one. He will seriously laugh. The M16s he got from the US Army were pieces of absolute SH!7. The barrel melted after just two hundred rounds of firing. The plastic things in melee combat fared even worse. He remembers an M16 breaking apart at the stock AND receiver after just one "bash". And that was in the 1970s, a few years after Vietnam. If that doesn't tell you just how MUCH the M-SH17TEEN fails, then I don't what will.

AK for the WIN!

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

m16 is faster, morer accuret and shotes longer.

*more accurate, shoots

I am pretty sure M16 is less accurate than AK-101

Kenzu wrote:

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

m16 is faster, morer accuret and shotes longer.

*more accurate, shoots

I am pretty sure M16 is less accurate than AK-101

why?

Why? Becuase. Just LOOK at all the variations of the AK. We have the 74, the Chinese "Type 81", 101, Sako Rk 62s, Galil, AN-94 (sorta), even Korea's Daewoo K2 rifle!

No other gun uses the direct impingment system EXCEPT the M16 rifle series!

AK-47s. Despite the fact that they are pretty weak compared to more modern models, they are the most reliable assault rifle I know of.

Plus, any gun that even your grandmother knows is probably legendary for a reason. :p

carmen510 wrote:

AK-47s. Despite the fact that they are pretty weak compared to more modern models, they are the most reliable assault rifle I know of.

Plus, any gun that even your grandmother knows is probably legendary for a reason. :p

It´s well known becuse ther are a lot of them especally in africa becuse the soviets gave any cuntry or rebbelion how were communist thousands of em
and thus there are 60 million ak-47 around the world. beleved to have killed as much as 20 million pepole.

And poor Mikhail Kalasnikov is unbelievibly sad about his invention. I've read a book simply called, "AK".

Although he has given us the modern doctrine of armies today, it has come at a terrible price...

At the end, he wishes he could have invented the lawnmower instead.

Jeiro Sijakeuigwan wrote:

And poor Mikhail Kalasnikov is unbelievibly sad about his invention. I've read a book simply called, "AK".

Although he has given us the modern doctrine of armies today, it has come at a terrible price...

At the end, he wishes he could have invented the lawnmower instead.

what?
Mikhail Kalasnikov didn´t invent the assult rifel the germans did he just modifide it a littel and diffrent types don´t make the ak any better
and ther are 5 types of m16

mattabesta wrote:

what?
Mikhail Kalasnikov didn´t invent the assult rifel the germans did he just modifide it a littel and diffrent types don´t make the ak any better
and ther are 5 types of m16

I never said Mikhail invented the assault rifle, I merely said, "he gave us the modern doctrine of modern armies today".

As for the M16... 5 types? Bullshit. I've seen all those so-called "5 types" and they are EVERY SINGLE FUCKING SAME! M4? A shortened M16 with collapsing stock. M16/M203? An M16 with a freaking grenade launcher stuck to it. Colt "XM" series? Basically a "prototype" M4 rifle...with only slight differences to length and other useless features added.

Jeiro Sijakeuigwan wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

what?
Mikhail Kalasnikov didn´t invent the assult rifel the germans did he just modifide it a littel and diffrent types don´t make the ak any better
and ther are 5 types of m16

I never said Mikhail invented the assault rifle, I merely said, "he gave us the modern doctrine of modern armies today".

As for the M16... 5 types? Bullshit. I've seen all those so-called "5 types" and they are EVERY SINGLE FUCKING SAME! M4? A shortened M16 with collapsing stock. M16/M203? An M16 with a freaking grenade launcher stuck to it. Colt "XM" series? Basically a "prototype" M4 rifle...with only slight differences to length and other useless features added.

what??
the AK wersions are all the same
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RPK
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:AK-47_type_II_Part_DM-ST-89-01131.jpghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/21/AK103.jpgAK-107_with_grenade_launcher_.jpg

+
the german one the firt assult rifel that was fairly workabel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmgewehr_44

No, only some AK variants are the same. The RPK is a light machine gun BASED on the AK action and appearance.

Do I see any M16 type machine guns? NO, I do not. It is because that plastic piece of sh!7 fails horribly and does a wonderful job at it too.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_the_AK-47_and_M16

Read that and hopefully, you'll change your mind. I like the AK simply because of one reason, reliability.

well it says that the problems with the m16 have been fixed so your in trubel
m16 is more leathal and has less recoil