Moderator Elections

Just as elections for chairmen are taking place, we need to make elections for moderators.

To elect a moderator we have to take into account:

-Neutrality and objectiveness
-Activity


If I had to choose, I'd propose as moderators:

Oligarch
Diogritor
BolshevikClock

i second oligarch as a moderator

I am honored

As am I.

Yay representation. I am quite flattered.

can i be a moderator for th green. even thought i am the only active one.

i got some more greens at school. i will try to invite them. i already got jinny here even thought he is a liberal

I could be a Liberal Democrat mod. Most of my posts actually count, whereas mattabesta spams up half the sections with quotes.

Jinnyjinster wrote:

I could be a Liberal Democrat mod. Most of my posts actually count, whereas mattabesta spams up half the sections with quotes.

dude your a fuck tard like all of you i'm leaving.

mattabesta wrote:

Jinnyjinster wrote:

I could be a Liberal Democrat mod. Most of my posts actually count, whereas mattabesta spams up half the sections with quotes.

dude your a fuck tard like all of you i'm leaving.

Be nice.

swearing is not caring

I nominate the green dude

SWEET

environmentalist wrote:

SWEET

oh yeah that's not you
it's the green dude

who is it?

environmentalist wrote:

who is it?

the green tree over ther

dude i am the damn green tree

environmentalist wrote:

dude i am the damn green tree

ohhhhhhhhhh
well i don´t like you

I deffinitely think Oligarch and Diogritor are some of the best Moderator material we've got.

I would actually boldly make them motherators but I think there should be a more direct election and it has to be as well consulted to Kenzu.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

I deffinitely think Oligarch and Diogritor are some of the best Moderator material we've got.

I would actually boldly make them motherators but I think there should be a more direct election and it has to be as well consulted to Kenzu.

a communist and a facist????????????????

could you go more unneutral?

I suggest someone from the greens or socal dems

mattabesta wrote:

a communist and a facist????????????????

could you go more unneutral?

I suggest someone from the greens or socal dems

To choose moderators in a forum like this you check the members' individual records and pay less attention to their political affiliation.

You check:

1. That they're active.
2. That they're objective.
3. That they're congruent.
4. That they're able to notice at once violations to guidelines.

I think that Diogritor and Oligarch are the best examples of this, however there are other members which I would take into account like environmentalist, Jeiro, kahnsguard, ilych and probably carmen510.

However, so far, I think the best option for a moderator is Oligarch. He's one of the most active members (No. 3), he has proven his objectiveness and has as well proven to notice when things are not going well.

I would gladly put a Social-Democrat but the fact is that, from all the active parties, they're the least active.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

a communist and a facist????????????????

could you go more unneutral?

I suggest someone from the greens or socal dems

To choose moderators in a forum like this you check the members' individual records and pay less attention to their political affiliation.

You check:

1. That they're active.
2. That they're objective.
3. That they're congruent.
4. That they're able to notice at once violations to guidelines.

I think that Diogritor and Oligarch are the best examples of this, however there are other members which I would take into account like environmentalist, Jeiro, kahnsguard, ilych and probably carmen510.

However, so far, I think the best option for a moderator is Oligarch. He's one of the most active members (No. 3), he has proven his objectiveness and has as well proven to notice when things are not going well.

I would gladly put a Social-Democrat but the fact is that, from all the active parties, they're the least active.

carmen would be the best and what would be the point in another admin from the socalist ranks?

mattabesta wrote:

carmen would be the best and what would be the point in another admin from the socalist ranks?

No admin, moderator. And is not matter of choosing a socialist or a liberal or a facist. Is matter of choosing someone active, partial and attentive to gudelines.

Carmen510, while possibly fulfills objectiveness and attentiveness is definitely not as active as Oligarch is who also fulfills the other criteria.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

carmen would be the best and what would be the point in another admin from the socalist ranks?

No admin, moderator. And is not matter of choosing a socialist or a liberal or a facist. Is matter of choosing someone active, partial and attentive to gudelines.

Carmen510, while possibly fulfills objectiveness and attentiveness is definitely not as active as Oligarch is who also fulfills the other criteria.

oh i thought this was admin thing.

buty mod for what?

I think I need to be mod for spammistan

mattabesta wrote:

oh i thought this was admin thing.

buty mod for what?

For some of the main forums.

mattabesta wrote:

I think I need to be mod for spammistan

I can assure you'd be even able to make Spamistan "too spammy".

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

oh i thought this was admin thing.

buty mod for what?

For some of the main forums.

mattabesta wrote:

I think I need to be mod for spammistan

I can assure you'd be even able to make Spamistan "too spammy".

lol thank you