Do you want a 3rd admin?

Tyrlop wrote:

10 votes now

8 votes, 2 don't count.

ow who what? sorry for spam.

Stos wrote:

Wait, why can't Zealot vote?

I won't vote yet.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Stos wrote:

Wait, why can't Zealot vote?

I won't vote yet.

He wont vote until its the last count counts.


8 yes 2 dont count


3 no

NEW ADMIN!
Make a damn thread about it O.O

CoolKidX wrote:

He wont vote until its the last count counts.

Not necesarily.

CoolKidX wrote:

8 yes 2 dont count


3 no

NEW ADMIN!
Make a damn thread about it O.O

10 DAYS or 20 votes what happens first

It's been 7 days, and there are just 9 votes since 2 don't count.

And a new rule:

Since such a matter can't be decided by such a little ammount of people, it must count with at least 15 votes.

For that to be possible, it goes to 15 days, so it has 8 days left.

so, you are saying their must be 15 yes votes?

most people think you are saying 15 votes total, also do you mean if the vote stays for 15 days we win? or do we lose because of lack of support?

Liche wrote:

so, you are saying their must be 15 yes votes?

most people think you are saying 15 votes total, also do you mean if the vote stays for 15 days we win? or do we lose because of lack of support?

15 votes total.

If the poll doesn't reach 15 votes after those 15 days, then you lose because it didn't gather enough support.

whos vote didnt count? i want to be accepted :'(

Tyrlop wrote:

whos vote didnt count? i want to be accepted :'(

Of those who didn't state.

i think i would be a good admin

HELL YES
as long as its not a commie, im kool wit it

Stop changeing the damn rules Zealut -.-"

Seriusly, but okay i guess..

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

whos vote didnt count? i want to be accepted :'(

Of those who didn't state.

what did i state? what is state? is it write arguments why new admin? thank you sorry.

Tyrlop wrote:

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

whos vote didnt count? i want to be accepted :'(

Of those who didn't state.

what did i state? what is state? is it write arguments why new admin? thank you sorry.

State is to make a statement. Your statement in this case is either "yes" or "no".


You would be a good admin beatnik, you know who the imbeciles of this forum are.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

whos vote didnt count? i want to be accepted :'(

Of those who didn't state.

what did i state? what is state? is it write arguments why new admin? thank you sorry.

State is to make a statement. Your statement in this case is either "yes" or "no".


You would be a good admin beatnik, you know who the imbeciles of this forum are.

thank you zealot
i also consider myself fairly read in marxism and syndicalism haha
are we going to poll for a new admin or what

beatnikzach wrote:

are we going to poll for a new admin or what

You know, choosing a new admin is of high relevance to this forum so it cannot be taken lightly. It's not as easy as in EMY. In EMY it was merely a bunch of marxists and there could be a trust between each other. But here you get very immature members and opposition so the new admin has to be able to deal properly with it.

The decision thus has to be taken more carefully.

Well, let's say we did vote. How many would be on the list? Who would be on the list, and who would compile this list? This just seems like an unnecessary pain in the ass. So i guess i vote no.

what if we say 90% = admin then you can have veto too.

Why 90%? That seems like an odd number.

why not 75?
and hell yes i would vote for beat

enviro wrote:

why not 75?
and hell yes i would vote for beat

thank you enviro, i thikn 75 is a good number, but its the majority so whatever ever number most people want, we can go with that

VIVA LA BEAT
haha osunds
like i like my vegiies

haha i actually like the way that sounds
who would support me though?

AYE CAPTIAN

im for a new admin, and i would like it to be me, but if its up to the people let them choose.