Proposing dissolving inactive parties

I propose dissolving all parties except for the basic 9 which existed before:
communist
socialist
social democratic
green
liberal democratic
conservative republican
anarchist
radical left
radical right

and there would be guilds:
Komsomol
Revolutionary Left
Anarcho-Syndicalist Union (19 october - will achieve the status of a guild)

The following parties would be removed:
-Stalinist (Its members would shift to radical left)
-Maoist (Its members would shift to radical left)
-Bonapartists (Its members can shift anywhere they like)

I couldnt agree more

NO UNITED RIGHT!!!

If there was no united right you agree?

We can discuss the issue of adding United right in a different thread.
For now, lets only discuss the decreased amount of political parties.

Kenzu wrote:

If there was no united right you agree?

of course, have you forgoten?

i started this with the partys

RedSoviet wrote:

Kenzu wrote:

If there was no united right you agree?

of course, have you forgoten?

i started this with the partys

What did you start? The new parties?

Kenzu wrote:

RedSoviet wrote:

Kenzu wrote:

If there was no united right you agree?

of course, have you forgoten?

i started this with the partys

What did you start? The new parties?

it was my suggestion to decrease the partys

why on earth would you keep green!?!?! it has one member!

Alek4A wrote:

why on earth would you keep green!?!?! it has one member!

haha! good one

Yes, you had a good idea RedSoviet!

We will keep green just for the count.
We will keep 9 political parties, just like in China!

isnt in china just 1 party

RedSoviet wrote:

isnt in china just 1 party

Nah!

There is the Glorious Communist Party
the Communist Party
The Far Left Party
The Red Party
The Socialist Party
...

kenzu you have no idea what happened here.

I disagree with this anti-democratic decision.
Btw, what about the liberal republican group ? Wich I might join after the dissolution of my party.

Hutin wrote:

I disagree with this anti-democratic decision.
Btw, what about the liberal republican group ? Wich I might join after the dissolution of my party.

this place is shredding.

kenzu, you're polishing brass on the titanic.

I agree there are too many inactive parties but I think we should lose the Soc Dems as there are no active members.

I think another good idea would be to create about four new user groups(i.e. Radical Left, Centre-Left, Centre-Right, Radical Right) that you become a member of upon joining certain parties(Communist and Socialist parties would be Radical Left, Conservative Republicans would be Centre-Right etc,) but can be joined without becoming a member a party.

oligarch wrote:

I agree there are too many inactive parties but I think we should lose the Soc Dems as there are no active members.

I think another good idea would be to create about four new user groups(i.e. Radical Left, Centre-Left, Centre-Right, Radical Right) that you become a member of upon joining certain parties(Communist and Socialist parties would be Radical Left, Conservative Republicans would be Centre-Right etc,) but can be joined without becoming a member a party.

might work, but their are a lot of memebers now, mostly people who creat accounts, join a party, and never come back.

Pss, a proposition for you : erase non-active groups only.

Hutin wrote:

Pss, a proposition for you : erase non-active groups only.

sounds good.

Kenzu my friend, this isn't China.

Hutin wrote:

Pss, a proposition for you : erase non-active groups only.

I have to agree Bonaparty has 3 active members, while stalinists, green etc have less. Why get rid of active parties? Just erase/combine the unactive groups. I don't want to leave the all-mighty Hutin.

Green doesn't even make sense as a political platform why keeping it?

Better idea: Keep the current parties, rename the Anarcho-Syndicalist Union' the Syndicalist Union, and allow multi-party.

of course i agree, to much partys

I think we should delete inactive parties only.