National Socialism

Where do I go since there's no Anarcho-Nazi party ???

You go to Putney on a pig.

Liche wrote:

Where do I go since there's no Anarcho-Nazi party ???

We fight till we get one.

that is for you too goons.

beatnikzach wrote:

that is for you too goons.

the goons thank you! i should put this as mai avatar!

Sill wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

that is for you too goons.

the goons thank you! i should put this as mai avatar!

ya you should.

beatnikzach wrote:

ya you should.

wait a second. i would get banned like that mattabesta guy wouldnt i?

Sill wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

ya you should.

wait a second. i would get banned like that mattabesta guy wouldnt i?

im not sure

mattabesta wrote:

becuse zelut likes powaar

Definitely, nothing gives me more power than disallowing a party based on a senseless doctrine.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

becuse zelut likes powaar

Definitely, nothing gives me more power than disallowing a party based on a senseless doctrine.

zealot, can i put that anarcho-nazi symbol as my avatar without being banned/suspended?

Wouldn't that symbol be anarcho-Hinduism?

Sill wrote:

zealot, can i put that anarcho-nazi symbol as my avatar without being banned/suspended?

I definitely like much more the panther... but yeah, you can put the swastika with an A. After all, like Stos says it makes more sense as "Anarcho-Hinduism".

How is it senseless? I could just as easily say communism is senseless as far as humans are involved in it. And Stos, why do you consider National Socialism bad? In the 1920s the USSR was considered National Socialist.

Liche wrote:

How is it senseless? I could just as easily say communism is senseless as far as humans are involved in it. And Stos, why do you consider National Socialism bad? In the 1920s the USSR was considered National Socialist.

What?
...What?
Also, I'm not a Leninist. Nor was Russia socialist. 'Socialism in one country' is a bad idea, and even that isn't referred to as 'national socialism'. Also, you refer to your party as anarcho-Nazi, and 'Nazi' refers specifically to the capitalist economy of Nazi Germany. Also, Lenin was hardly a nationalist, he wanted international socialism, it's just that no other revolutions took place, since obviously they hadn't had Lenin showing them signs of 'Bread, Peace and Land' and not much else. What's your point?

im confused
SO I THINK I SHOULD JUST TELL ZEL THAT HE NEEDS TO GIVE EVERYSINGLE PERSON A APRTY AS THE GREEN PARTY ISNT EVEN A PARTY AND ONLY HAS ONE MEMBER

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

becuse zelut likes powaar

Definitely, nothing gives me more power than disallowing a party based on a senseless doctrine.

that´S your powaar you get to decide what is senseless and whatnot.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

becuse zelut likes powaar

Definitely, nothing gives me more power than disallowing a party based on a senseless doctrine.

While the doctrine may seem illogical to you, I think the fact there are actual organizations (like nazi.org) that hold these beliefs validates them as a real ideology.

oligarch wrote:

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

becuse zelut likes powaar

Definitely, nothing gives me more power than disallowing a party based on a senseless doctrine.

While the doctrine may seem illogical to you, I think the fact there are actual organizations (like nazi.org) that hold these beliefs validates them as a real ideology.

exacly

Liche wrote:

How is it senseless? I could just as easily say communism is senseless as far as humans are involved in it.

It's simple, how the hell can you have an anarchic national socialism? National Socialism implies the existance of a welfare state and the existance of private coprorations. How is that anarchic?

On the other hand, communism can't be senseless. It implies all the workers joining for each other's benefit and that happens once ignorance is eliminated.

Liche wrote:

And Stos, why do you consider National Socialism bad?

Have you read an ything regarding to the implications of National "Socialism"?

Liche wrote:

In the 1920s the USSR was considered National Socialist.

On which grounds? From which period to which period?

oligarch wrote:

While the doctrine may seem illogical to you, I think the fact there are actual organizations (like nazi.org) that hold these beliefs validates them as a real ideology.

Would theistic atheism sound logical to you? Would a "theistic atheist league" make sense? What about the congruence of a philantropic misantropist?

mattabesta wrote:

that´S your powaar you get to decide what is senseless and whatnot.

Unlike you I don't recurr to phallacies like your ad baculum arguements.

National Socialist Anarchism is utmost oxymoronic and so far its proponents here haven't given a defense of the ideology. Sill comes and says Liche could better explain what Nazi Anarchism consists of and Liche came with nothing but a (flawed) paralelism to communism and USSR.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Would theistic atheism sound logical to you? Would a "theistic atheist league" make sense? What about the congruence of a philantropic misantropist?

No, but wouldn't matter as long as made sense to other people.

Yea Zealot quit being an ignorant I'M SORRY! I SHOULD NOT SWEAR! THE KGB CAN HEAR EVERYONE! , only caring about communists.

Liche wrote:

Yea Zealot quit being an ignorant I'M SORRY! I SHOULD NOT SWEAR! THE KGB CAN HEAR EVERYONE! , only caring about communists.

What?

I don't care just for communists. Give a decent defense of Nazi-Anarchist ideology and you'll get your party.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Liche wrote:

Yea Zealot quit being an ignorant I'M SORRY! I SHOULD NOT SWEAR! THE KGB CAN HEAR EVERYONE! , only caring about communists.

What?

I don't care just for communists. Give a decent defense of Nazi-Anarchist ideology and you'll get your party.

WE DID LOOK AT THE ENTIRE "suggestion" thread I made

Liche wrote:

WE DID LOOK AT THE ENTIRE "suggestion" thread I made

You sincerely think that's a decent defense?

Half decent......

If Lilith says we can make it can we?