| | Isn't it technically offical now? |  |
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Liche
Chairman of the Supreme Council
Posts : 4613
Join date : 2008-01-30
Age : 30
Location : USA-Virginia
|  Subject: Isn't it technically offical now?  Sun Oct 19, 2008 1:14 am | |
| Zealot, I remember you saying if there were 3 supporters for a new party/group you would make one.
Sill,Matti, as well as myself all support the awesomist party (or what ever you want to call it). So shouldn't it be made now? | |
|
| | |
Sill
Senior Komsomol Member
Posts : 236
Join date : 2008-09-29
Age : 32
Location : Germany
| | Subject: Re: Isn't it technically offical now? Sun Oct 19, 2008 1:40 am | |
| - Liche wrote:
- Zealot, I remember you saying if there were 3 supporters for a new party/group you would make one.
Sill,Matti, as well as myself all support the awesomist party (or what ever you want to call it). So shouldn't it be made now? Structured Anarchism. Perfect. 3 members = Weres our group? | |
|
| | |
oligarch
Chairman of the WR Committee
Posts : 1643
Join date : 2008-01-31
| | Subject: Re: Isn't it technically offical now? Sun Oct 19, 2008 2:25 am | |
| National Anarcho-Socialism or an ideology like that would deserve its own party but Structured Anarchism doesn't sound like it differs very much from Anarcho-Syndicalism. | |
|
| | |
Zealot_Kommunizma
Hero of the World Republic
Posts : 5413
Join date : 2007-12-06
Age : 35
Location : Mexico/Russia/Worl
| | Subject: Re: Isn't it technically offical now? Sun Oct 19, 2008 2:47 am | |
| I don't remember saying that at all. | |
|
| | |
Liche
Chairman of the Supreme Council
Posts : 4613
Join date : 2008-01-30
Age : 30
Location : USA-Virginia
| | Subject: Re: Isn't it technically offical now? Sun Oct 19, 2008 2:52 am | |
| Zealot you did when we made the union? remember? | |
|
| | |
Zealot_Kommunizma
Hero of the World Republic
Posts : 5413
Join date : 2007-12-06
Age : 35
Location : Mexico/Russia/Worl
| | Subject: Re: Isn't it technically offical now? Sun Oct 19, 2008 3:05 am | |
| - Liche wrote:
- Zealot you did when we made the union? remember?
No, I didn't say getting 3 members gives you right for a party. | |
|
| | |
Liche
Chairman of the Supreme Council
Posts : 4613
Join date : 2008-01-30
Age : 30
Location : USA-Virginia
| | Subject: Re: Isn't it technically offical now? Sun Oct 19, 2008 3:06 am | |
| - Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:
- Liche wrote:
- Zealot you did when we made the union? remember?
No, I didn't say getting 3 members gives you right for a party. No but you said something about if there are 3 active members it can something....I don't know exact words but I just remember something along those lines. | |
|
| | |
Zealot_Kommunizma
Hero of the World Republic
Posts : 5413
Join date : 2007-12-06
Age : 35
Location : Mexico/Russia/Worl
| | Subject: Re: Isn't it technically offical now? Sun Oct 19, 2008 3:07 am | |
| - Liche wrote:
- Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:
- Liche wrote:
- Zealot you did when we made the union? remember?
No, I didn't say getting 3 members gives you right for a party. No but you said something about if there are 3 active members it can something....I don't know exact words but I just remember something along those lines. Someone proposed it but I didn't say I agreed with it. | |
|
| | |
Liche
Chairman of the Supreme Council
Posts : 4613
Join date : 2008-01-30
Age : 30
Location : USA-Virginia
| | Subject: Re: Isn't it technically offical now? Sun Oct 19, 2008 3:24 am | |
| Oh, my bad.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Isn't it technically offical now? | |
| |
|
| | |
| | Isn't it technically offical now? | |
|
