May I remain in komsoml

I honestly don't tcare but vote anyway.


ah and this shit:


explain the following terms:
communism
Communism is a socioeconomic structure that promotes the establishment of an egalitarian, classless, stateless society based on common ownership of the means of production and property in general

socialism
Socialism refers to a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state or collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and the creation of an egalitarian society. or in short distributing capitalist wealth.

capitalism.
Were the market is open and profit driven and most companies are privately owned.

Give a scenario when each of the following is bad:
dictatorship
Autocrats often go to war and needless to say 90% of the time wars are bad.


Democracy
when the populace get's fed whatever bullshit the state or media wants them to think like Russia or USA and UK.

What are the strengths and weaknesses of
1.free market
cons:
uh wow none? since the prize is decided by the ppl it's the ppl that are bad in not the market itself.
pros:
everyone can get what they want if they got the money.

2.centrally planned economy.
cons: you can't always get the stuff you want often you only get what you "need" .

pros: what you need is basically free if you are in a low intensity job.


What kind of economic system is there in EU?
diffrent types mostly mixed, with a free market but insane taxation on the rich in comparison to poor, FX sweeden.

This is too much electing.

and a insult to me

Hmm, i wonder how much of that came from wikipedia.

Black_Cross wrote:

Hmm, i wonder how much of that came from wikipedia.

99% ^^

Black_Cross wrote:

Hmm, i wonder how much of that came from wikipedia.

ca. 95%

I'm lazy.

mattabesta wrote:

ca. 95%

I'm lazy.

Good point.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

ca. 95%

I'm lazy.

Good point.

lol why should I bothere with my own opinion it'S not allowed anyway.

mattabesta wrote:

lol why should I bothere with my own opinion it'S not allowed anyway.

You're asked to give your understanding, a definition according to your knowledge on said subject, not your opinion.

Black_Cross wrote:

Hmm, i wonder how much of that came from wikipedia.

Pretty much all of it, from what I can see.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

lol why should I bothere with my own opinion it'S not allowed anyway.

You're asked to give your understanding, a definition according to your knowledge on said subject, not your opinion.

that is an opinion.

mattabesta wrote:

that is an opinion.

No, that is not an opinion. And opinion is a comment, is a personal point of view usually refering to the quality of something. A definition is a description, it is related to the meaning of the object.

By the way, matti's bit on the free market is really rather stupid.

you right itkindof did
man i got like WHAT THE I'M SORRY! I SHOULD NOT SWEAR! THE KGB CAN HEAR EVERYONE! after maybe 3 lines

Kenzu wrote:

I am AGAINST mattabesta, because he voted against me too.[/color]

thats not a very good reason to say someone cant go on a forum. just because you dont like the reason he voted against you doesnt mean you vote against him. This is not about your opinons on the guy or your personal reflections toward him

hes alright, let him in

hey sill wuick question
y you leave?

I don't care that kenzu is aganst me after the first 3 bans I stopped

Kenzu wrote:

I am not against you. I am against spam.

If you want to be treated better by others, you should treat them better too.

I made a few jokes when the lib dem forum was dead there was no need to ban me without warning me first, it's kinda weird I NEVER get warnings I always get banned.