Create Fascist Party?

Should i be awarded a fascit category? Stalinist and Maoist are empty and still have one. I think i deserve one, and Bisarck could be a candidate for such party.

Authoritarian Right = Fascist.

CoolKidX wrote:

Authoritarian Right = Fascist.

Such lies

Well fascists don't doctrine them as Authorian right, as Maoist/Stalinist don't doctrine themselves as Authorian left, yet they still have a group.

So yes.

Rename wrote:

Well fascists don't doctrine them as Authorian right, as Maoist/Stalinist don't doctrine themselves as Authorian left, yet they still have a group.

So yes.

China doctrines itself as communist. Doesn't make it the least bit true.

Zeronos wrote:

Rename wrote:

Well fascists don't doctrine them as Authorian right, as Maoist/Stalinist don't doctrine themselves as Authorian left, yet they still have a group.

So yes.

China doctrines itself as communist. Doesn't make it the least bit true.

No he only refers to the description and the justification of those groups.

Jesus wrote:

Zeronos wrote:

Rename wrote:

Well fascists don't doctrine them as Authorian right, as Maoist/Stalinist don't doctrine themselves as Authorian left, yet they still have a group.

So yes.

China doctrines itself as communist. Doesn't make it the least bit true.

No he only refers to the description and the justification of those groups.

It's the same principle. Simply because the Stalinists and Maoists do not see themselves as authoritarian doesn't mean they aren't.

Since you couldn't tell i was being sarcastic, i agree with the idea of getting rid of Maoist/Stalinist, but admins won't do it, so i support the idea of branching off even more so it becomes fair when theirs 5,000 groups.

Also add cancel vote.

4 to 3 i think it's a win for me

Have some patience. The poll's only been open for a day.

We already have authoritarian right, and I dont think it makes sense to make a party with only a few members.

Besides, it is against forumotion rules to promote fascism in any way. I dont want this forum to be deleted just because of some fascist party with 2 members.

Kenzu wrote:

We already have authoritarian right, and I dont think it makes sense to make a party with only a few members.

Besides, it is against forumotion rules to promote fascism in any way. I dont want this forum to be deleted just because of some fascist party with 2 members.

That reminds me of FrontFascism.Forumotion.com, that got deleted, i used to go on that website all the time until forumotion nazis got it deleted.

the only reason there are many (no offense) pointless groups (wtf bonaparty?) is because Kenzu and Zealot disagree on groups, Kenzu thinks there should be few groups, where as Zealot doesn't mind having additional groups.

So, sorry Jesus, you have to just join authoritarian right (at least for now).


and also I vote yes

Zeronos wrote:

Rename wrote:

Well fascists don't doctrine them as Authorian right, as Maoist/Stalinist don't doctrine themselves as Authorian left, yet they still have a group.

So yes.

China doctrines itself as communist. Doesn't make it the least bit true.

=> officialy socialist

Liche wrote:

the only reason there are many (no offense) pointless groups (wtf bonaparty?) is because Kenzu and Zealot disagree on groups, Kenzu thinks there should be few groups, where as Zealot doesn't mind having additional groups.

So, sorry Jesus, you have to just join authoritarian right (at least for now).


and also I vote yes

I think it is good to have 2 admins. The overall adminship is less biased and it is possible to seek help from both admins and we can listen to more opinions.

Kenzu wrote:

=> officialy socialist

De facto capitalist. India is also officially socialist and de facto capitalist, the same goes for Cuba and North Korea.

Liche wrote:

the only reason there are many (no offense) pointless groups (wtf bonaparty?) is because Kenzu and Zealot disagree on groups, Kenzu thinks there should be few groups, where as Zealot doesn't mind having additional groups.

So, sorry Jesus, you have to just join authoritarian right (at least for now).


and also I vote yes

What's the difference between Authoritarian Right and Fascism?

Well, now that Maoist and Stalinist are just classfied as Authorian Left, i see no point as to why Fascist and Nazi's can go in Authorian Right. No need to branch off, and anyway, over MSN Jesus said he was now an anarchist again.

Rename wrote:

Well, now that Maoist and Stalinist are just clas..in Authorian Right. No need to branch off, and anyway, over MSN Jesus said he was now an anarchist again.

Zealot, this is one reason why I think you oppress the rightists.

Liche wrote:

Zealot, this is one reason why I think you oppress the rightists.

Not a proper one, though. Stalinists and Moists had their groups removed, but also, they had given reasons for which they both thought that Stalinism and Maoism were not authoritarian and why they shouldn't want to be chucked in within the same category as say Trotskiyists.

As for rightists... a made a question. What's the difference between Authoritarian Right and Fascism?

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

As for rightists... a made a question. What's the difference between Authoritarian Right and Fascism?

Well.. what officially is Authorian Right? Im sure that they could classify theirselves as "not authorian" just as Maoists/Stalinists can. Whether it's true or not.

Rename wrote:

Well.. what officially is Authorian Right? Im sure that they could classify theirselves as "not authorian" just as Maoists/Stalinists can. Whether it's true or not.

And they'd have to provide an arguement to fundament it like Maoists and Stalinists did.

all I remember is one day there where two new parties.

can you show me the discussion? (this made me curios, I want to see the thread, so I can maybe learn more about maoists).

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Kenzu wrote:

=> officialy socialist

De facto capitalist. India is also officially socialist and de facto capitalist, the same goes for Cuba and North Korea.

I agree with all except for Cuba. I think it is more socialist than capitalist.

And why do you say India is officially socialist? They mention socialism in their constitution, but don't seem to be as thorough with propagating it as certain other countries. (India = Long term friend of USSR)

Kenzu wrote:

I agree with all except for Cuba. I think it is more socialist than capitalist.

You can't be more socialist and less socialist. Or you're socialist or you aren't.
Cuba is a state capitalism.

Kenzu wrote:

And why do you say India is officially socialist? They mention socialism in their constitution, but don't seem to be as thorough with propagating it as certain other countries. (India = Long term friend of USSR)

India deifnes itself as socialist republic. But they're not.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

You can't be more socialist and less socialist. Or you're socialist or you aren't.

stop being like watermelon, dont make statemenst, argue why you believe that. i certanly dont believe you are right..
i believe that people can be more or less socialist or more or less liberal.