May i join Komsomol?

A quick look:



Two trials begin!

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Two trials begin!

I'd prefer it if you just banned all of my accounts.
This is coming directly from the user, so no trials needed, correct?
Ban. Now.

My original purpose of this has been accomplished, oh and also you may want to take a closer look at proxy between a few other active users, i may be entitled to one of them also...heh, maybe more than 'a few' others.

But im not Sill, thats my friends account. Still, ban him, he won't be active anymore.

Zealot@

It at the Posted square it says.

Sun Jan 4, 2009 3:09 am...

WTF!?

That's not even a hour diffrence...

Are you in Russia now or something?

Nope, it's default settings

5 Yes

3 No

Looks like a win

what its 4 yes 4 no

No watermelon, if you check renamed changed his vote to yes

4/4:arrow: 5/3

Jesus wrote:

No watermelon, if you check renamed changed his vote to yes

4/4:arrow: 5/3

"Rename"

And his vote doesn't count anymore.

I voted yes.

well since his vote simply doesnt count

it's

4 Yes

3 No

well I suggest doing a new poll, since this one is corrupted.

Well not really. We just add 1 to yes and retire 1 from no. Sounds pretty simple.

no i dont trust yur formula. we must restart the proces

Hutin wrote:

Drake is yourself, isn't ? Seems pretty evident, now, since Drake is an anglophone, and can't read french correctly.

No, Jesus is one person. I have checked.

Hoxhaist wrote:

no i dont trust yur formula. we must restart the proces

Watermelon, King Of Spammers, i think you should like this disorder

5 Yes

3 No

king ofspamer, why me ? tyrklop orrename, enirvo, matebestea, are the heros of my field. i onl dream to emmlate thei acopmoishment.

well

5 Yes

3 No
¸
After like 1 week. Is it enough?

i acidentaly voted yes but i ment no

no you voted no....

thaats debatable

Hoxhaist wrote:

thaats debatable

no its not. theres analytical proof that you originally voted no.

ANALYTICALS POROF LOLOLLOL

do you know whay the words mean you are saying. i gues you try to mean synthetic proof. look on wkipedia for analytic synthetic dstinction- important philosophy topc

5 Yes (coolkid voting cheeze but mean yes)
3 No (Rename's vote has changed to yes but was unvalid anyway)

I know i already posted that but, shouldn't i be allowed in komsomol since i got the majority?

it looks like 5 no 4 yes you liar

Isnt it now 5 yes and 5 no?(including cheese)

No now it's still

5 Yes
3 No

You voted cheeze so it adds to yes making it 5. Rename voted no but his vote was invalid, making it 4, watermelon just voted against, for the 2nd time making it 3. Actually since he was banned several times, shouldn't his vote be invalid twice?