Your vestimentary style ?

beatnikzach wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

even if i was it would be so self-dumb to wear them.

they are comfortable.
you make no fucking sense, your a troll, and a reactionary.
so i will be god damned if some pseudo-revolutionary, social democrat fuck tries to tell me about what shoes i can wear.

one, they are fucking vegan shoes, which means they have to be made domestic.

two, i bought them at famous footwear so dont give me that shit they were like twelve dollars.

are you going to tell me i cant own a computer next?

fucking grow up you piece of garbage.

one eighteen your old kid wearing fucking burkinstocks instead of reeboks wont make a difference

dude.... im no troll i mean this! your so mainstream, you should try to wear something that some pour underpaid worker hasnt done, example a pair of 2nd hand shoes, OR some Real shoes, made by a real shoemaker. OR even better, get your moms/dad or grandparents old shoes. or if you can find "fairtrade" shoes if that exist but they prbly cost alot.. you shouldnt buy that shit if you a are a true socialist. and please dont insult mean, i dont want to sound arrogant but i proberly do anyways. but its not my intention

EDIT
also wanted to add this:

Peace

BOYKUT CAPITALISM

You don't boycott capitalism by not buying things.

If all of us were to limit ourselves to buy just the unexpendable... guess what? The capitalist economy would entirely revolve around such unexpendable goods.

Wnat to boycott capitalism? Get some class awareness and help others acquire it!

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

You don't boycott capitalism by not buying things.

If all of us were to limit ourselves to buy just the unexpendable... guess what? The capitalist economy would entirely revolve around such unexpendable goods.

Wnat to boycott capitalism? Get some class awareness and help others acquire it!

i agree, since i have huge respect for you. ive decided to post some activism that i would need all of your help to fullfil, ill post later, i hope that everyone would help me to finish this. you will see later

that only creates newer markets.

beatnikzach wrote:

that only creates newer markets.

not if you dont buy anything related to clothes.

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

that only creates newer markets.

not if you dont buy anything related to clothes.

Why?

Hutin wrote:

comrade110397 wrote:

I dont wear clothes..

lolwut

Wearing clothes promotes captialism. Unless you made it.

comrade110397 wrote:

Wearing clothes promotes captialism. Unless you made it.

Based on that premise, you're supporting capitalism.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

comrade110397 wrote:

Wearing clothes promotes captialism. Unless you made it.

Based on that premise, you're supporting capitalism.

You shouldnt be talking. You wear clothes too.

comrade110397 wrote:

You shouldnt be talking. You wear clothes too.

The problem is that your premise is false and would require you to isolate yourself and defacto practice anarcho primitivism.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

comrade110397 wrote:

You shouldnt be talking. You wear clothes too.

The problem is that your premise is false and would require you to isolate yourself and defacto practice anarcho primitivism.

The accual probelm is that you cant understand sarcasm.

comrade110397 wrote:

The accual probelm is that you cant understand sarcasm.

The problem is that this discussion was not ripe for such sarcasm.

lol, Im still trying to understand why you use Reactionary as an insult.

Liche wrote:

lol, Im still trying to understand why you use Reactionary as an insult.

Because for us socialists, reactionary is an insult.

Liche wrote:

lol, Im still trying to understand why you use Reactionary as an insult.

Well, what do you see as positive about being reactionary?

Black_Cross wrote:

Liche wrote:

lol, Im still trying to understand why you use Reactionary as an insult.

Well, what do you see as positive about being reactionary?

what is a reactionary

Tyrlop wrote:

Black_Cross wrote:

Liche wrote:

lol, Im still trying to understand why you use Reactionary as an insult.

Well, what do you see as positive about being reactionary?

what is a reactionary

Fighting against progressive change. Most people aren't reactionary (like the authoritarian lefties might tell ya), so much as they spew reactionary rhetoric. It's endemic in the culture most everywhere, except for any tribal culture, or village communities.

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

that only creates newer markets.

not if you dont buy anything related to clothes.

lets be honest, you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.

beatnikzach wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

that only creates newer markets.

not if you dont buy anything related to clothes.

lets be honest, you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.

yes i do. i wish i could say tl.dr

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

that only creates newer markets.

not if you dont buy anything related to clothes.

lets be honest, you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.

yes i do. i wish i could say tl.dr

fucking prove it then.

according to your "theory" procuring only clothing supports the market; ergo supports capitalism.
i think that apple is a little bit more evil then champion.
i will agree with the sentiment that buying things supports the market, but seriously lets be fucking realistic, will a boycott work when only leftists do it?
no because then again, they will create new markets and new products made just for the leftists.
the domestic made and the environmentally sound garbage.

its like kashi and kellogg.
kashi started as a good, healthy, natural, vegan, cereal brand, now look who owns the?

i agree with not supporting monopolies and not buying shit like ipods and such, but clothing?
get real.

beatnikzach wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

that only creates newer markets.

not if you dont buy anything related to clothes.

lets be honest, you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.

yes i do. i wish i could say tl.dr

fucking prove it then.

according to your "theory" procuring only clothing supports the market; ergo supports capitalism.
i think that apple is a little bit more evil then champion.
i will agree with the sentiment that buying things supports the market, but seriously lets be fucking realistic, will a boycott work when only leftists do it?
no because then again, they will create new markets and new products made just for the leftists.
the domestic made and the environmentally sound garbage.

its like kashi and kellogg.
kashi started as a good, healthy, natural, vegan, cereal brand, now look who owns the?

i agree with not supporting monopolies and not buying shit like ipods and such, but clothing?
get real.

dont know what to write. nowdays specialy in europe, i think, people waste alot of money on clothings, stuff lige dolce banana and guchi.
well now a few people starts to buy their clothes from 2nd hand, there is a market and there is a capital blah, but nevertheless its better, cheaper, and prettier, and also symbolic, to buy clothes from 2nd hand, or make them yourself, i repair my own damn clothes if it miss a button, and many of my friends are shocked, another is to get your parents old clothes, or your brothers, or your grandparents, its maybe not "cool" but this is what its all about, go against the stream and btw, would a rightish start a revolution?
im not sure if you get my point and i dont think you will get it. little note

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

that only creates newer markets.

not if you dont buy anything related to clothes.

lets be honest, you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.

yes i do. i wish i could say tl.dr

fucking prove it then.

according to your "theory" procuring only clothing supports the market; ergo supports capitalism.
i think that apple is a little bit more evil then champion.
i will agree with the sentiment that buying things supports the market, but seriously lets be fucking realistic, will a boycott work when only leftists do it?
no because then again, they will create new markets and new products made just for the leftists.
the domestic made and the environmentally sound garbage.

its like kashi and kellogg.
kashi started as a good, healthy, natural, vegan, cereal brand, now look who owns the?

i agree with not supporting monopolies and not buying shit like ipods and such, but clothing?
get real.

dont know what to write. nowdays specialy in europe, i think, people waste alot of money on clothings, stuff lige dolce banana and guchi.
well now a few people starts to buy their clothes from 2nd hand, there is a market and there is a capital blah, but nevertheless its better, cheaper, and prettier, and also symbolic, to buy clothes from 2nd hand, or make them yourself, i repair my own damn clothes if it miss a button, and many of my friends are shocked, another is to get your parents old clothes, or your brothers, or your grandparents, its maybe not "cool" but this is what its all about, go against the stream and btw, would a rightish start a revolution?
im not sure if you get my point and i dont think you will get it. little note

of course people waste money on shit, its not like im wearing designer clothing. so honestly this just proves yet again, you have no clue what is going on.
and a rightist starting a revolution is called a reaction.

beatnikzach wrote:

and a rightist starting a revolution is called a reaction.

not really, reaction is a counter action. not a rightish revolution.

Tyrlop wrote:

beatnikzach wrote:

and a rightist starting a revolution is called a reaction.

not really, reaction is a counter action. not a rightish revolution.

In revolutionary terms "reaction" is the opposition to the revolutionary change. Change is the action, it's attempted prevention the reaction.

Ok so wtf does that have to do with clothing?