Your political side

mattabesta wrote:

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

carmen510 wrote:

The USSR didn't work, simply because the government didn't listen to the people. And when it did during Gorbachev's rule, it collapsed and turned into democracy that didn't want socialism back.

No democracy there, nor anytwhere else.

democracy din't come to russi curruption came

Democracy doesn't exist anywhere.

mattabesta wrote:

but wher's my incuregement to be gr8?
and why did millions fee from the communist states?

*encouragement

Your encouragement to be great lies within performing your job well and the societal acknowledgement of that.

Really? I haven't seen any communist state yet... oh... you mean the State Capitalisms. People were searching for freer and less incongruent forms of capitalism and some were fleeing the paranoid prosecution of those regimes.

I would also like to point out that the type of Government has nothing to do with the government killing its on people, it has to do with the PEOPLE ruling the government

But the people didn't get to choose the people ruling in the government. The USSR ruled itself with an iron fist and didn't bother to change that into a titanium fist.

RedNation wrote:

I would also like to point out that the type of Government has nothing to do with the government killing its on people, it has to do with the PEOPLE ruling the government

and the form of goverment wich gives them the ability to kill those pepole.

strange ,but those who say yes never lived in ssrs nor in post-sovietic country... Why do you think this post-sovietic country people hates ssrs so much?...

comiescums wrote:

strange ,but those who say yes never lived in ssrs nor in post-sovietic country... Why do you think this post-sovietic country people hates ssrs so much?...

bec ause it was state capitalism.

cary jebus wrote:

comiescums wrote:

strange ,but those who say yes never lived in ssrs nor in post-sovietic country... Why do you think this post-sovietic country people hates ssrs so much?...

bec ause it was state capitalism.

it's called socalism

mattabesta wrote:

it's called socalism

No. It is state capitalism. Ever WONDER why the government gets EVERYTHING and the people recieve nothing?

That's capitalism to the EXTREME.

mattabesta wrote:

cary jebus wrote:

comiescums wrote:

strange ,but those who say yes never lived in ssrs nor in post-sovietic country... Why do you think this post-sovietic country people hates ssrs so much?...

bec ause it was state capitalism.

it's called socalism

you apear to not be sounding it out right, here ill help.

STA-ETE cap-it-ill-ism

cary jebus wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

cary jebus wrote:

comiescums wrote:

strange ,but those who say yes never lived in ssrs nor in post-sovietic country... Why do you think this post-sovietic country people hates ssrs so much?...

bec ause it was state capitalism.

it's called socalism

you apear to not be sounding it out right, here ill help.

STA-ETE cap-it-ill-ism

socalism is the incorparation of all industry into goverment hands wheile still maintaining the market.

socalism

mattabesta wrote:

cary jebus wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

cary jebus wrote:

comiescums wrote:

strange ,but those who say yes never lived in ssrs nor in post-sovietic country... Why do you think this post-sovietic country people hates ssrs so much?...

bec ause it was state capitalism.

it's called socalism

you apear to not be sounding it out right, here ill help.

STA-ETE cap-it-ill-ism

socalism is the incorparation of all industry into goverment hands wheile still maintaining the market.

socalism

socialism

Socialism refers to a broad array of ideologies and political movements with the goal of a socio-economic system in which property and the distribution of wealth are subject to control by the community.[1] This control may be either direct—exercised through popular collectives such as workers' councils—or indirect—exercised on behalf of the people by the state. As an economic system, socialism is often characterized by state, worker, or community ownership of the means of production, goals which have been attributed to, and claimed by, a number of political parties and governments throughout history.

state capitalism

State capitalism, in its classic meaning, is a private capitalist economy under state control. This term was often used to describe the controlled economies of the great powers in the First World War.[1] In more modern sense, state capitalism is a term used to describe a system where state is intervening in the markets to protect and advance interests of big business. This practice is in sharp contrast with the ideals of free market capitalism.[2]

cary jebus wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

cary jebus wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

cary jebus wrote:

comiescums wrote:

strange ,but those who say yes never lived in ssrs nor in post-sovietic country... Why do you think this post-sovietic country people hates ssrs so much?...

bec ause it was state capitalism.

it's called socalism

you apear to not be sounding it out right, here ill help.

STA-ETE cap-it-ill-ism

socalism is the incorparation of all industry into goverment hands wheile still maintaining the market.

socalism

socialism

Socialism refers to a broad array of ideologies and political movements with the goal of a socio-economic system in which property and the distribution of wealth are subject to control by the community.[1] This control may be either direct—exercised through popular collectives such as workers' councils—or indirect—exercised on behalf of the people by the state. As an economic system, socialism is often characterized by state, worker, or community ownership of the means of production, goals which have been attributed to, and claimed by, a number of political parties and governments throughout history.

state capitalism

State capitalism, in its classic meaning, is a private capitalist economy under state control. This term was often used to describe the controlled economies of the great powers in the First World War.[1] In more modern sense, state capitalism is a term used to describe a system where state is intervening in the markets to protect and advance interests of big business. This practice is in sharp contrast with the ideals of free market capitalism.[2]

socalist goverments, cuba, venuzuvela, china
all have compete controle of the econamy

this is state capitalism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_capitalism

State capitalism, in its classic meaning, is a private capitalist economy under state control. This term was often used to describe the controlled economies of the great powers in the First World War.^[1] In more modern sense, state capitalism is a term used to describe a system where state is intervening in the markets to protect and advance interests of big business. This practice is in sharp contrast with the ideals of free market capitalism.^[2]
This term is also used by some heterodox economists to describe a society wherein the productive forces are owned and run by a state in a capitalist way, even if such a state chooses to call itself socialist.^[3] Within Marxist literature, state capitalism is usually defined in the latter sense: as a social system combining capitalism — the wage system of producing and appropriating surplus value — with ownership by a state apparatus. By that definition, a state capitalist country is a country where the government controls the economy and essentially acts like a single giant corporation.

The term itself was in use within the socialist movement from the late nineteenth century onwards. Wilhelm Liebknecht in 1896 said: "Nobody has combatted State Socialism more than we German Socialists; nobody has shown more distinctively than I, that State Socialism is really State capitalism!" ^[4]
There are various theories and critiques of state capitalism, some of which have been around since the October Revolution. The common themes among them are to identify that the workers do not meaningfully control the means of production and that commodity relations and production for profit still occur within state capitalism

those are not TRUE socialist states

cary jebus wrote:

those are not TRUE socialist states

true socalist states are communist and not socalist.
but I've proven my point and your wrong

mattabesta wrote:

true socalist states are communist and not socalist.
but I've proven my point and your wrong

WTF?! Dude. All of us "communists" here have reliterated to you here MULTIPLE TIMES, that there has been NO communist country.

EVER. Lemme say it again.
THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNIST COUNTRY! EVAH!

Jeiro Sijakeuigwan wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

true socalist states are communist and not socalist.
but I've proven my point and your wrong

WTF?! Dude. All of us "communists" here have reliterated to you here MULTIPLE TIMES, that there has been NO communist country.

EVER. Lemme say it again.
THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNIST COUNTRY! EVAH!

I KNOW

kahnsguard wrote:

WTF!!!!!!??????[sWTF!!!!!!??????ize=24]WTF!!!!!!??????[/size]WTF!!!!!!??????WTF!!!!!!??????WTF!!!!!!??????

huh?

kahnsguard wrote:

Jeiro Sijakeuigwan wrote:

THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNIST COUNTRY! EVAH!

yes and?

mattabesta wrote:

cary jebus wrote:

kahnsguard wrote:

Jeiro Sijakeuigwan wrote:

THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNIST COUNTRY! EVAH!

I really am missing the point here

you clamed cuba was socialist

cary jebus wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

cary jebus wrote:

kahnsguard wrote:

Jeiro Sijakeuigwan wrote:

THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNIST COUNTRY! EVAH!

I really am missing the point here

you clamed cuba was socialist

It is.

cary jebus wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

cary jebus wrote:

kahnsguard wrote:

Jeiro Sijakeuigwan wrote:

THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNIST COUNTRY! EVAH!

I really am missing the point here

you clamed cuba was socialist

it is

mattabesta wrote:

BolshevikClock wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

ok so the worker can not get a promotion even though he's ten times better then his fellow workers?

no, he gets dignity and pride

ok i see now why communism is only pobular with a small group of pepole.
even thoug i work harder produce more do better than my negbour my life will alwaies be the same qualaty.
good in a ressesion bad in a boom

BolshevikClock wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

ok so the worker can not get a promotion even though he's ten times better then his fellow workers?

no, he gets dignity and pride

ok i see now why communism is only POPULAR with a small group of PEOPLE. even THOUGH i work harder produce more do better than my NEIGHBOUR my life will ALWAYS be the same QUALITY.
good in a RECESSION bad in a boom.

WRITE PROPERLY!!!

Quote :

ok i see now why communism is only pobular with a small group of pepole.
even thoug i work harder produce more do better than my negbour my life will alwaies be the same qualaty.

False. Also Cuba is not socialist.