If democrasy opresses minorities...

Well if the revltion needs atleast the majorty, and only 60% joins them, the other 40% dosnt want it, then the revoltionaries opress the minorty.
So what's with that?
You need all the workers(so like 80-90% or so).

Or how your going to fix that??

(This is for some left-wingers who say democrasy opresses minorties, there right tough with only chooseing 2 people(like in USA) but you can always have little party's, like a Constitutional monarchy)

Also, after the revltion what kind of democrasy will be taken in?

CoolKidX wrote:

Well if the revltion needs atleast the majorty, and only 60% joins them, the other 40% dosnt want it, then the revoltionaries opress the minorty.
So what's with that?
You need all the workers(so like 80-90% or so).

No then they'd still be 'oppressing the minority'. :O
After a revolution, we'll have whatever the workers want. However, I'd prefer a decentralized democracy, with, of course, an SIU governing economic issues.

Even in a 95%vs5% system the minority gets repressed. Actually, even if there were just 1,000 people that opposed they'd be repressed.

For an instance, the socialist revolution is in the benefit of the workers, we'd get a good enough majourity. Basically thoise repressed would be extra-highly paid workers, workers that perform no useful task at all (talk shows conductors for example) and of course the owners of the means of production.

Eventually the oppresion would end because such individuals would eventually disappear.

I'm for direct democracy which needs a complex but effective mechanism to be stablished.