Nobel Peace Prize

So we know who won it. Now i wanna ask you who you think should've won it.

My vote would've gone to one of three i think:

Noam Chomsky

Dr. Mukwege

Mumia Abu-Jamal

Morgan Tsvangirai

I prefered Mumia, IF he's the guy I'm even thinking of.

Tyrong Kojy wrote:

I prefered Mumia, IF he's the guy I'm even thinking of.

The dude on death row.

one of these three: jesus, karl marx or my dad.
or els i they should split it between the south korean prime minister, the japanese president and the chinese prime minister. they deserve it. trust me, thats right. i guarantee it

WeiWuWei wrote:

Tyrong Kojy wrote:

I prefered Mumia, IF he's the guy I'm even thinking of.

The dude on death row.

I meant what he did.

Daniel Barons.

Heh

http://www.freemumia.com/who.html

At the top of this link is a short summation of what he's done. It doesn't mention in that part that he's been sitting peacefully on death row for 26 years, despite being [obviously] framed.

Want to make a petition for Mumia to win?


I wouldn't be surprised of Obama supports it.

Castro will, a handful of celebrities will, a lot of influential people will. We just have to get the petition out there.

PS: Tyrlop, Mumia is more deserving than Karl Marx and your dad combined multiplied by 1000, Jesus would agree with Mumia winning, and wouldn't accept the award for himself.

^^^ If Obama supported that, he'd have pardoned him by now. The fact that he's going to let Mumia die elucidates where the president stands.

Or he doesn't even know. And no, that wasn't the guy I was thinking of. I've never even heard of him, outside of the show The Boondocks. I thought he was made up for the show.

He's become a pretty significant political figure in the US, and should be recognizable by anyone who concerns themselves with news (i'm not taking a stab at you; you live in Canada).

Yeah, pretty much. Like I said, hear of him on The Boondocks. He he he.

Either Chomskiy or Medvedev.

what was wrong with obama wining it
im not for or against yet
just want to know what you think of this

Because he didn;t do anything to earn it, really. He healed America's image a tad, yeah, but otherwise he won because he's not Bush.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Either Chomskiy or Medvedev.

Medvedev is an interesting answer.

WeiWuWei wrote:

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Either Chomskiy or Medvedev.

Medvedev is an interesting answer.

He's the only modern bourgeoise politician whose military interventions have ended in the quick termination of an armed conflict and the prevention of further loss of civilian life. Else, from the great powers, Russia is the only one that has intervened militarily as a response from aggression without toppling another country's state, running that country over and engaging defacto in a genocide.

By traditional hypocritic political standards, de facto, the only legitimate military intervention of the XXI century has been performed by the Russian Federation under Medvedev's standards.

Not only did they not give the Nobel Peace price to Medvedev, they actually condemned his actions and accused Russia of being an imperialist nation that sought to conquest Georgia.

Meanwhile Iraq and Afghanistan have been occupied for years by coalitions formed by these criticizing states, their governments having been subsituted at will by the powers conquering them and with even interim rule by citizens of these conquering nations.

It's just impressive how even within that ridiculous political circus they can't be consistent with their own principles, despite of how obvious things are. I guess that just adds up to the "circusity" of these politics.