Mow Crij

Did you go to sleep?

Pannekoek wrote:

Did you go to sleep?

for 30 mins...

I'm ashamed of you.

my new favorite quote

^^That's tight. I'm a big Guevara fan, and i've never even seen that picture. Nice find Mono.

I join!

Gays are not opressed, anyways. And what's so wrong being against gay propoganda?

Sign me up.

Riddler wrote:

Gays are not opressed, anyways.

That is your excuse for not tolerating their way of life?

Quote :

And what's so wrong being against gay propoganda?

Nothing, however, there is something wrong with being against gays just for the fact that they are gay. You said we shouldn't tolerate perverts; that has nothing to do with being anti-propaganda. You blatently admitted to being a homophobe.

Kenzu wrote:

I join!

kahnsguard wrote:

Sign me up.

Alright, i'm sure Freeman will be pleased to hear about this. All who oppose bigotry and intolerance of choices regarding autonomy and freedom are welcome.

NoJustice.NoPeace wrote:

Nothing, however, there is something wrong with being against gays just for the fact that they are gay. You said we shouldn't tolerate perverts; that has nothing to do with being anti-propaganda. You blatently admitted to being a homophobe.

Well, I've meant the different thing. I mean that we shouldn't tolerate propoganda of perversies, if someone is a pervert, he can do it at his home, not making parades, etc. Gay parades is a propoganda of their "way of life", that's what I am against.

Riddler wrote:

NoJustice.NoPeace wrote:

Nothing, however, there is something wrong with being against gays just for the fact that they are gay. You said we shouldn't tolerate perverts; that has nothing to do with being anti-propaganda. You blatently admitted to being a homophobe.

Well, I've meant the different thing. I mean that we shouldn't tolerate propoganda of perversies, if someone is a pervert, he can do it at his home, not making parades, etc. Gay parades is a propoganda of their "way of life", that's what I am against.

... Okay, then stop calling them perverts. Doing so still labels them as abnormal, immoral, or unnatural; if you continue to use that term i will continue to assume you're a homophobe.

Riddler wrote:

NoJustice.NoPeace wrote:

Nothing, however, there is something wrong with being against gays just for the fact that they are gay. You said we shouldn't tolerate perverts; that has nothing to do with being anti-propaganda. You blatently admitted to being a homophobe.

Well, I've meant the different thing. I mean that we shouldn't tolerate propoganda of perversies, if someone is a pervert, he can do it at his home, not making parades, etc. Gay parades is a propoganda of their "way of life", that's what I am against.

Its not as if to purpose of gay pride events is too brain wash you into becoming a homosexual.

can we ignore riddler and focus on organizational suggestions?

I am gonna start a draft of the constitution tonight.

There should be a list of things you have to agree with to join mow crij so we don't have people like riddler infiltrating it and turning it stalinist.

Comrade Emy wrote:

There should be a list of things you have to agree with to join mow crij so we don't have people like riddler infiltrating it and turning it stalinist.

What do you mean turning it stalinist? Anyway, I join, if the movement doesn't supports gay propoganda.

The movement does support gays so I guess you won't be joining.

Comrade Emy wrote:

The movement does support gays so I guess you won't be joining.

I meant gay propoganda, like gay parades, etc. I'm not against gays if they're not spreading their "way of life".

Riddler wrote:

Comrade Emy wrote:

The movement does support gays so I guess you won't be joining.

gay propoganda,

What about Gay Propaganda

riddler isn't joining

end

or kenzu. no racist or antigay pepole allowed. or sexist. Or ageist(discrimination based on age), so mark is not allowed to join.

Comrade Emy wrote:

or kenzu. no racist or antigay pepole allowed. or sexist. Or ageist(discrimination based on age), so mark is not allowed to join.

What about discrimination based on religion(radical atheism)?

None of that either.

kahnsguard wrote:

None of that either.

That's very popular, however, within some "marxists".

religion is retarded but no discrimination against religious people. Criticism is okay but not discrimination.