The peoples court was a bad idea in my opinion...

It was just asking to get abused from the get go. I think that it would be smart if it was a chairmen/mod only forum, but making it completly public, isnt the best idea. What do you guys think?

seconded

Seeing as I'm about to get permanently banned from this forum, thirded.

ilych wrote:

It was just asking to get abused from the get go. I think that it would be smart if it was a chairmen/mod only forum, but making it completly public, isnt the best idea. What do you guys think?

Fourthed. I think it may be good to have it open to the public to some extent, but some kinks need to be worked out.

Maybe it should be approved by an admin before it goes public.

And when/if it goes public, it shouldn't be a vote of what kind of punishment, but a vote of punishment or not. That way there's no easy way for someone to be permabanned... like pannekoek. It should be - Punishment? Yes or no? Then there can be a debate about what punishment is fitting (permaban should be only for the worst of the worst), and then the admin can carry out whatever sentence is generally and logically agreed upon....

Hold on, i've got an idea.

Is the idea for mow crij to decide?

Fifth. Just another forum for spamming.

How many numbers do we have to have in order to overthrow the people's court.

Sounds good.

So the rules will be changed.

There has to be a reason if someone trials someone else. Spamming, insulting etc.

not if you just dont like them.

From now on, it has to become a sticky for it to become official and fully legal. If you want to trial someone, just open a thread who you want to sew and why. If you are at least partially right, we will open a thread on whether the person should be punished or not.

The KGB has been given the power to cleanse this forum from spam.
Spammers can expect to loose some of their post count and might be even punished.