Should I get full access?

(let's see if Zealot really cares about a democratic procedure)

Good behavior and decent posts will get you everywhere in this site.

Which obviously you HAVE NOT shown.

But....but you have full access! And you have good behavior and decency? Oh yeah, insulting Jews and Americans is VERY decent....

calinis wrote:

But....but you have full access! And you have good behavior and decency? Oh yeah, insulting Jews and Americans is VERY decent....

Something he never did.

3 yes and 2 no
yes wins, he can get full acsess, the ppl have spoken, don't blame me blame demcracy
Anyways he got more yes votes so i think he can have full acses.

CoolKidX wrote:

3 yes and 2 no
yes wins, he can get full acsess, the ppl have spoken, don't blame me blame demcracy
Anyways he got more yes votes so i think he can have full acses.

Who said voting ended?

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

CoolKidX wrote:

3 yes and 2 no
yes wins, he can get full acsess, the ppl have spoken, don't blame me blame demcracy
Anyways he got more yes votes so i think he can have full acses.

Who said voting ended?

Idk well u could make like a offcial poll to vote if he can have full acses i mean its more demcratic.
Not all ppl have your opnion.
I'm just saying.

Zealot doesn't care for democratic procedures. If the majority said I should have full access, I doubt I would be granted it though.

calinis wrote:

Zealot doesn't care for democratic procedures. If the majority said I should have full access, I doubt I would be granted it though.

The thing is that I do not recognize minoritary votations. That is, if there is low participation in a poll, I can't regard it as democratic.

If the majority is indifferent, then this is valid.

calinis wrote:

If the majority is indifferent, then this is valid.

Not really.

If it remains 3-2 after 2 weeks, what will be the result?

calinis wrote:

If it remains 3-2 after 2 weeks, what will be the result?

I'll set some rules:

1. It will require a minimum of 15 votes.
2. It will be open for 5 days or until it reaches 15 votes. If after 5 days it hasn't reached 15 votes it will be nulified, deleted and a new one will have to be made.
3. For an option to be taken as definitive it must count with at least 51% support.
4. At least 4 users that vote "yes" must fundament their approval for granting access to the remainder of the forum to you. They must defend their positions on why they think you should get full access in no less than 5 sentences. If they don't manage to do so effectively, the petition will be nulified.

That's not fair. There's not even 15 active people that come on a day-to-day basis. Why did mattabesta IMMEDIATELY gain full access after he was banned for the same length as me? Why should 4 people have to say why? If they vote "yes" then their opinion should count.

calinis wrote:

That's not fair. There's not even 15 active people that come on a day-to-day basis.

Triarii, lilith, liche, comrade pollet, me, cyprian, jeiro, enviro, mattabesta, revolution, tyrlop, vraptorx, riddler, redsoviet, coolkidx plus anarchist dagger paying an unexpected visit. And attention can be called upon this thread, overall, round 20 votes can be got.

calinis wrote:

Why did mattabesta IMMEDIATELY gain full access after he was banned for the same length as me?

Because he's considerably more decent than you.

calinis wrote:

Why should 4 people have to say why? If they vote "yes" then their opinion should count.

If someone says "yes, because 'calinis' sounds cool" it's not a valid reason for me to grant you full access. There must be backup.

Lilth doesn't come on much and doesn't know who I am anyways.

I dont know who is vraptorx is, he's obviously not active.

Revolution and riddler aren't active.

Anarchist.dagger isn't active.

If someone comes on once in a blue moon, it doesn't mean they are active.

Out of the people you listed, I would classify only 10 as being active.
How can this be a legitimate poll when the majority aren't active?
You used 15 because you know 15 people aren't active.

But as someone says no because he's dumb it isnt a vilid reason either right?
I mean atleast 4 ppl have to do the same with the No anwser.

calinis wrote:

Lilth doesn't come on much and doesn't know who I am anyways.

Comes often enough, 11.

calinis wrote:

I dont know who is vraptorx is, he's obviously not active.

He comeslike once or twice per week, 12.

calinis wrote:

Revolution and riddler aren't active.

They are, but i}even if thery were not active enough it's matter of PMing them, 14.

calinis wrote:

Anarchist.dagger isn't active.

He came yesterday so there's a chance he could participate in votations, 15.

calinis wrote:

If someone comes on once in a blue moon, it doesn't mean they are active.

Any scarcely active member can be PMed and called to the poll. I think around 20-25 votes can be got.

calinis wrote:

Out of the people you listed, I would classify only 10 as being active.
How can this be a legitimate poll when the majority aren't active?You used 15 because you know 15 people aren't active.

Around 10% of all the existant members are active, I just chose a broader minority.

CoolKidX wrote:

But as someone says no because he's dumb it isnt a vilid reason either right?

Are you refering to Jeiro's opinion on Hitler or what?

CoolKidX wrote:

I mean atleast 4 ppl have to do the same with the No anwser.

There's no need at all.

Quote :

Should I get full access?

NO!

that "im not spamming anymore" was a load of bullshit

just neady to look, lol

... Im active >> just not always in a posting mood

Diogritor wrote:

... Im active >> just not always in a posting mood

How the hell could I not mention you?

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

calinis wrote:

Lilth doesn't come on much and doesn't know who I am anyways.

Comes often enough, 11.

calinis wrote:

I dont know who is vraptorx is, he's obviously not active.

He comeslike once or twice per week, 12.

calinis wrote:

Revolution and riddler aren't active.

They are, but i}even if thery were not active enough it's matter of PMing them, 14.

calinis wrote:

Anarchist.dagger isn't active.

He came yesterday so there's a chance he could participate in votations, 15.

calinis wrote:

If someone comes on once in a blue moon, it doesn't mean they are active.

Any scarcely active member can be PMed and called to the poll. I think around 20-25 votes can be got.

calinis wrote:

Out of the people you listed, I would classify only 10 as being active.
How can this be a legitimate poll when the majority aren't active?You used 15 because you know 15 people aren't active.

Around 10% of all the existant members are active, I just chose a broader minority.

CoolKidX wrote:

But as someone says no because he's dumb it isnt a vilid reason either right?

Are you refering to Jeiro's opinion on Hitler or what?

CoolKidX wrote:

I mean atleast 4 ppl have to do the same with the No anwser.

There's no need at all.

No im not refering about Jerio's opnion just random.
And i still think the no ppl should have atleast 4 posts.
I mean Jerico said some things pretty much like callnis.
And 15 ppl in 5 days to vote , why not 10 or 12?

CoolKidX wrote:

No im not refering about Jerio's opnion just random.

It's still not clear.

CoolKidX wrote:

And i still think the no ppl should have atleast 4 posts.

Yet, there's no need. There's enough back up.

CoolKidX wrote:

I mean Jerico said some things pretty much like callnis.

Not really, he didn't accuse anyone employing fallacies.

CoolKidX wrote:

And 15 ppl in 5 days to vote , why not 10 or 12?

Because they can be got.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

CoolKidX wrote:

No im not refering about Jerio's opnion just random.

It's still not clear.

CoolKidX wrote:

And i still think the no ppl should have atleast 4 posts.

Yet, there's no need. There's enough back up.

CoolKidX wrote:

I mean Jerico said some things pretty much like callnis.

Not really, he didn't accuse anyone employing fallacies.

CoolKidX wrote:

And 15 ppl in 5 days to vote , why not 10 or 12?

Because they can be got.

15, cause that's the maxium active ppl in thiz week?
It could easly be less.