Climbing down to Democratic Socalism

i cant easily explain why, but I am now a Social Democrat. sorry old comrades, i hope you don't hate me for this.

sweet but this forum is pretty dead

...interesting.

I suppose now it will be clearer who are the more accepting among you.


...so ...how is it climbing down?

Comrade Pollett wrote:

i cant easily explain why, but I am now a Social Democrat. sorry old comrades, i hope you don't hate me for this.

Why?

MightyObserver wrote:

...interesting.

I suppose now it will be clearer who are the more accepting among you.


...so ...how is it climbing down?

it can be climbing down or climbing up, ether way.

Stos wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

Stos wrote:

Stos wrote:

Comrade Pollett wrote:

i cant easily explain why, but I am now a Social Democrat. sorry old comrades, i hope you don't hate me for this.

Why?

kill the duble postearr

Why?

don't double post

Comrade Pollett wrote:

i cant easily explain why, but I am now a Social Democrat. sorry old comrades, i hope you don't hate me for this.

Just like that?... What happened?

He seems to be explaining in his political profile that socialism is to good to be true and a bit of "if you can't fight them, join them. But I still like you guys!".

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

He seems to be explaining in his political profile that socialism is to good to be true and a bit of "if you can't fight them, join them. But I still like you guys!".

Social democracy is too impossible to be true. I mean, the welfare state is possible, if unsustainable, but democracy under capitalism? Not possible. Of course, there's also the fact that your free healthcare comes from the blood of workers in the apparently 'Third world'.

So, you're a slave. You're offered two choices of owners. One would work you hard and give you little food or rest. The other would work you less hard, and give you more food and rest. Well, guess what, you're still a slave.

Then I am happy with a slaves life
right now to tell you the truth the only thing id do to change Canada is make Jack Layton or prime minister.

Comrade Pollett wrote:

Then I am happy with a slaves life
right now to tell you the truth the only thing id do to change Canada is make Jack Layton or prime minister.

Yeah vote for a mentally handicapped individual who promotes attacking oil companies and banks (the only thing that makes us protected from the crysis atm) and has a candidate that promotes the Charia (islamic tribunal)

Comrade Pollett wrote:

Then I am happy with a slaves life

Comrade Pollett wrote:

Then I am happy with a slaves life
right now to tell you the truth the only thing id do to change Canada is make Jack Layton or prime minister.

Defeatism at its best, I'd say.

Stos wrote:

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

He seems to be explaining in his political profile that socialism is to good to be true and a bit of "if you can't fight them, join them. But I still like you guys!".

Social democracy is too impossible to be true. I mean, the welfare state is possible, if unsustainable, but democracy under capitalism? Not possible. Of course, there's also the fact that your free healthcare comes from the blood of workers in the apparently 'Third world'.

So, you're a slave. You're offered two choices of owners. One would work you hard and give you little food or rest. The other would work you less hard, and give you more food and rest. Well, guess what, you're still a slave.

lol, ever heard of Scandinavia?

mattabesta wrote:

lol, ever heard of Scandinavia?

I heard Nokia, IKEA, Saab, Absolut, Bofors, Ericsson and Volvo are Scandinavian brands.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Comrade Pollett wrote:

Then I am happy with a slaves life
right now to tell you the truth the only thing id do to change Canada is make Jack Layton or prime minister.

Defeatism at its best, I'd say.

Id fight to become a "slave" again if that was the case, I don't want "freedom"

Comrade Pollett wrote:

Then I am happy with a slaves life
right now to tell you the truth the only thing id do to change Canada is make Jack Layton or prime minister.

I might agree to support social democrats to bring a country closer to socialism, however, why do you have to become a social democrat yourself, once you have already achieved a socialist or communist mind?

You have been a communist, so why do you go back in progress?
I mean I understand social democrats becomming socialists or communist, but the other way round? It seems a little bit uncomprehendable.

Could you please explain this radical move?

Kenzu wrote:

Comrade Pollett wrote:

Then I am happy with a slaves life
right now to tell you the truth the only thing id do to change Canada is make Jack Layton or prime minister.

I might agree to support social democrats to bring a country closer to socialism

How the hell does welfare capitalism bring a country closer to socialism? Like all capitalism, it is in the interests of capitalists. I've already gone into detail on that twice today, so I'll just for an explanation.

mattabesta wrote:

Stos wrote:

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

He seems to be explaining in his political profile that socialism is to good to be true and a bit of "if you can't fight them, join them. But I still like you guys!".

Social democracy is too impossible to be true. I mean, the welfare state is possible, if unsustainable, but democracy under capitalism? Not possible. Of course, there's also the fact that your free healthcare comes from the blood of workers in the apparently 'Third world'.

So, you're a slave. You're offered two choices of owners. One would work you hard and give you little food or rest. The other would work you less hard, and give you more food and rest. Well, guess what, you're still a slave.

lol, ever heard of Scandinavia?

i agree here. stuff is not black and white in scandinavia seriously think about it and dont answer this post.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

lol, ever heard of Scandinavia?

I heard Nokia, IKEA, Saab, Absolut, Bofors, Ericsson and Volvo are Scandinavian brands.

and?
they rock?
also none heard of StatoilHydro?

Scandinavia is awesome, as is Democratic Socialism.

Stop complaining, he can believe what he wants.

Tyrlop wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

Stos wrote:

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

He seems to be explaining in his political profile that socialism is to good to be true and a bit of "if you can't fight them, join them. But I still like you guys!".

Social democracy is too impossible to be true. I mean, the welfare state is possible, if unsustainable, but democracy under capitalism? Not possible. Of course, there's also the fact that your free healthcare comes from the blood of workers in the apparently 'Third world'.

So, you're a slave. You're offered two choices of owners. One would work you hard and give you little food or rest. The other would work you less hard, and give you more food and rest. Well, guess what, you're still a slave.

lol, ever heard of Scandinavia?

i agree here. stuff is not black and white in scandinavia seriously think about it and dont answer this post.

Metal is black in Scandinavia.

Quote :

Democratic Socialism.

It's not an awesome term, it's fairly redundant.

Stos wrote:

It's not an awesome term, it's fairly redundant.

How so?

mattabesta wrote:

and?
they rock?
also none heard of StatoilHydro?

If those brands are Scandinavian, and they are, it means Scandinavians are also slaves.

Liche wrote:

Stos wrote:

It's not an awesome term, it's fairly redundant.

How so?

Socialism is intrinsically democratic. Arguably there is not something as "non democratic socialism".

Else, the way in which the term is employed is also wrong.