Radical left?

Why did my group changed its name? Because radical left(or extreme/ultra left) and stalinist is not actually the same thing.

To be honest comrade, I find that definition rather senseless.

A radical movement is the one that focuses on the roots of the problems it adresses. "Radical" is not synonim to "extreme" or "authoritarian" in any way.

From this point of view I'd say any marxist movement is radical.

The point is that there will be only one group for Stalinists and Maoists. If you have a suggestion on how it should be called, please let me know.

Kenzu wrote:

The point is that there will be only one group for Stalinists and Maoists. If you have a suggestion on how it should be called, please let me know.

I'm sure a group for 'Stalinists' and a group for 'Maoists' wouldn't be too much harm, non? It would at least make more sense than 'radical left'. Or we could just name them 'Blanquists'.

Stos wrote:

Kenzu wrote:

The point is that there will be only one group for Stalinists and Maoists. If you have a suggestion on how it should be called, please let me know.

I'm sure a group for 'Stalinists' and a group for 'Maoists' wouldn't be too much harm, non? It would at least make more sense than 'radical left'. Or we could just name them 'Blanquists'.

And then make another group for Hoxhaist, and then another for Juche and soon we will end up with 10 of such similiar parties.

Let's call it conservative left
or anti-revisionist left?

Conservative lleft, sounds somewhat funny.

Kenzu wrote:

Stos wrote:

Kenzu wrote:

The point is that there will be only one group for Stalinists and Maoists. If you have a suggestion on how it should be called, please let me know.

I'm sure a group for 'Stalinists' and a group for 'Maoists' wouldn't be too much harm, non? It would at least make more sense than 'radical left'. Or we could just name them 'Blanquists'.

And then make another group for Hoxhaist, and then another for Juche and soon we will end up with 10 of such similiar parties.

Let's call it conservative left
or anti-revisionist left?

Heh, 'anti-revisionist'.

what about we make a theme week were we all choise between the russian partys or groups: monarchists. menschewist, soviets, bolschwists.
? i didnt really understod them all but it could be fun, then we can have another theme week were it is the partys in germany today, or what ever country like maybe Denmark, then i could explain what each party representated. i would also love to have a theme week for elections 1932 germany srlsy its my pearl, i know so much about this i love it, im romantist in this age.

Kenzu wrote:

Stos wrote:

Kenzu wrote:

The point is that there will be only one group for Stalinists and Maoists. If you have a suggestion on how it should be called, please let me know.

I'm sure a group for 'Stalinists' and a group for 'Maoists' wouldn't be too much harm, non? It would at least make more sense than 'radical left'. Or we could just name them 'Blanquists'.

And then make another group for Hoxhaist, and then another for Juche and soon we will end up with 10 of such similiar parties.

Let's call it conservative left
or anti-revisionist left?

Here's a thought, let's call it authoritarian left like it used to be.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Conservative lleft, sounds somewhat funny.

Do you not know what 'conservative' means?

If we'd divided the Authoritarian leftgroup into Stalinist and Maoist groups, we'd have to divide the Communist group into Marxist, Leninist and Trotskyist groups So it doesn't make any sense.

Yes, I was thinking 'Authoritarian left? Nah, too obvious, there must be a different issue here.'

The name will be renamed back to Authoritarian Left