Possible regime change in Pakistan, possible coalition

The Pakistani People's Party has recent recently won the parliamentary elections in a landslide. Yet there is talk of forming a "coalition government" with the Muslim opposition party against the current president Musharraf.

What are your thoughts

Links to story:

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/8800577B-D03F-409E-BEC8-C7600414366A.htm

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/3291EE7C-B4DE-4F08-AE53-76D78A244767.htm

A coalition is no solution. This is what the imperialists wanted all along. It is also what the right wing of the PPP wanted as well. But the masses are waiting for concrete results, an end to their misery. On this path we will see class polarisation within the PPP itself, which will prepare the ground for the intervention of the Marxists.

oligarch wrote:

A coalition is no solution. This is what the imperialists wanted all along. It is also what the right wing of the PPP wanted as well. But the masses are waiting for concrete results, an end to their misery. On this path we will see class polarisation within the PPP itself, which will prepare the ground for the intervention of the Marxists.

what?
coalitions usally have some problems and it is generally better to have one ruling party but colations are usally well functoning.

The Revolutionary class must make no compromises with the bourgeois parties or the bourgeois elements of the PPP; instead the must seize on this opportunity and overthrow the ruling class and force out the imperialists.

Coalition is uniting people under one banner, like it or not. I believe that they should have a bipartisan effort to make Pakistan better, but not unite with eachother.

carmen510 wrote:

Coalition is uniting people under one banner, like it or not. I believe that they should have a bipartisan effort to make Pakistan better, but not unite with eachother.

The bourgeoisies is incapable of making Pakistan better.

oligarch wrote:

carmen510 wrote:

Coalition is uniting people under one banner, like it or not. I believe that they should have a bipartisan effort to make Pakistan better, but not unite with eachother.

The bourgeoisies is incapable of making Pakistan better.

why?
pakistan has a gr8 potntiential to be big it´s realatyvly close to europe(closer than china) it has a workforce of 100millioin dubeling in the next 50 years and it's modrenising in terms of eqalaty beetwen the sexis.

mattabesta wrote:

oligarch wrote:

carmen510 wrote:

Coalition is uniting people under one banner, like it or not. I believe that they should have a bipartisan effort to make Pakistan better, but not unite with eachother.

The bourgeoisies is incapable of making Pakistan better.

why?
pakistan has a gr8 potntiential to be big it´s realatyvly close to europe(closer than china) it has a workforce of 100millioin dubeling in the next 50 years and it's modrenising in terms of eqalaty beetwen the sexis.

Pakistan will only get better under socialism.

oligarch wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

oligarch wrote:

carmen510 wrote:

Coalition is uniting people under one banner, like it or not. I believe that they should have a bipartisan effort to make Pakistan better, but not unite with eachother.

The bourgeoisies is incapable of making Pakistan better.

why?
pakistan has a gr8 potntiential to be big it´s realatyvly close to europe(closer than china) it has a workforce of 100millioin dubeling in the next 50 years and it's modrenising in terms of eqalaty beetwen the sexis.

Pakistan will only get better under socialism.

pakistan is islamic, pakistan is a rual cuntry with littel or none consubtion
socalism needs industry to work but since socalism costs money they can not build new industry.

mattabesta wrote:

oligarch wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

oligarch wrote:

carmen510 wrote:

Coalition is uniting people under one banner, like it or not. I believe that they should have a bipartisan effort to make Pakistan better, but not unite with eachother.

The bourgeoisies is incapable of making Pakistan better.

why?
pakistan has a gr8 potntiential to be big it´s realatyvly close to europe(closer than china) it has a workforce of 100millioin dubeling in the next 50 years and it's modrenising in terms of eqalaty beetwen the sexis.

Pakistan will only get better under socialism.

pakistan is islamic, pakistan is a rual cuntry with littel or none consubtion
socalism needs industry to work but since socalism costs money they can not build new industry.

Russia was in a similar state at the time of the Bolshevik revolution.

oligarch wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

oligarch wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

oligarch wrote:

carmen510 wrote:

Coalition is uniting people under one banner, like it or not. I believe that they should have a bipartisan effort to make Pakistan better, but not unite with eachother.

The bourgeoisies is incapable of making Pakistan better.

why?
pakistan has a gr8 potntiential to be big it´s realatyvly close to europe(closer than china) it has a workforce of 100millioin dubeling in the next 50 years and it's modrenising in terms of eqalaty beetwen the sexis.

Pakistan will only get better under socialism.

pakistan is islamic, pakistan is a rual cuntry with littel or none consubtion
socalism needs industry to work but since socalism costs money they can not build new industry.

Russia was in a similar state at the time of the Bolshevik revolution.

russia is weired
it has always been weird
but russia had industry and was lightly populated.

The underclasses of Pakistan have the potential to take power if they are radicalized.

oligarch wrote:

The underclasses of Pakistan have the potential to take power if they are radicalized.

underclasses?
ther are trhee classes :
way rich like really rich.
pepole who live in good housing and own one TV
poor farmers and orphans.

mattabesta wrote:

oligarch wrote:

The underclasses of Pakistan have the potential to take power if they are radicalized.

underclasses?
ther are trhee classes :
way rich like really rich.
pepole who live in good housing and own one TV
poor farmers and orphans.

The farmers and workers are the largest classes in Pakistan.

oligarch wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

oligarch wrote:

The underclasses of Pakistan have the potential to take power if they are radicalized.

underclasses?
ther are trhee classes :
way rich like really rich.
pepole who live in good housing and own one TV
poor farmers and orphans.

The farmers and workers are the largest classes in Pakistan.

of fucking coures
that´s why there is a need to close the gap and balance the system

mattabesta wrote:

oligarch wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

oligarch wrote:

The underclasses of Pakistan have the potential to take power if they are radicalized.

underclasses?
ther are trhee classes :
way rich like really rich.
pepole who live in good housing and own one TV
poor farmers and orphans.

The farmers and workers are the largest classes in Pakistan.

of fucking coures
that´s why there is a need to close the gap and balance the system

Thats why they need to take power.

oligarch wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

oligarch wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

oligarch wrote:

The underclasses of Pakistan have the potential to take power if they are radicalized.

underclasses?
ther are trhee classes :
way rich like really rich.
pepole who live in good housing and own one TV
poor farmers and orphans.

The farmers and workers are the largest classes in Pakistan.

of fucking coures
that´s why there is a need to close the gap and balance the system

Thats why they need to take power.

yes liberlas need to take power

who ever gets elected the un peace corps, the U.S.A military, NATO, and other allies should get rid of al-queda who plagues that region

Jamescart wrote:

who ever gets elected the un peace corps, the U.S.A military, NATO, and other allies should get rid of al-queda who plagues that region

are you from america?
becouse you know there are more orginisations than al queda

Jamescart wrote:

who ever gets elected the un peace corps, the U.S.A military, NATO, and other allies should get rid of al-queda who plagues that region

The US has made people's movement out of and it can't just be exterminated with more militarism.

oligarch wrote:

Jamescart wrote:

who ever gets elected the un peace corps, the U.S.A military, NATO, and other allies should get rid of al-queda who plagues that region

The US has made people's movement out of and it can't just be exterminated with more militarism.

my personal opinion is that evryone should withdraw from afganistan and isolate the country till they can stop theas stupid tribal fights

mattabesta wrote:

oligarch wrote:

Jamescart wrote:

who ever gets elected the un peace corps, the U.S.A military, NATO, and other allies should get rid of al-queda who plagues that region

The US has made people's movement out of and it can't just be exterminated with more militarism.

my personal opinion is that evryone should withdraw from afganistan and isolate the country till they can stop theas stupid tribal fights

People have been trying for thousands of years but it remained as tribal as ever despite numerous invaders.

oligarch wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

oligarch wrote:

Jamescart wrote:

who ever gets elected the un peace corps, the U.S.A military, NATO, and other allies should get rid of al-queda who plagues that region

The US has made people's movement out of and it can't just be exterminated with more militarism.

my personal opinion is that evryone should withdraw from afganistan and isolate the country till they can stop theas stupid tribal fights

People have been trying for thousands of years but it remained as tribal as ever despite numerous invaders.

yeah even the brits coun't hold it

mattabesta wrote:

oligarch wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

oligarch wrote:

Jamescart wrote:

who ever gets elected the un peace corps, the U.S.A military, NATO, and other allies should get rid of al-queda who plagues that region

The US has made people's movement out of and it can't just be exterminated with more militarism.

my personal opinion is that evryone should withdraw from afganistan and isolate the country till they can stop theas stupid tribal fights

People have been trying for thousands of years but it remained as tribal as ever despite numerous invaders.

yeah even the brits coun't hold it

Neither could the Indians, Moguls, Russians, Soviets, or Americans now. There have also been several others.

A state born because of prejudiced cannot survive, Weather it be the Confederates, Nazis, Palistein. this is what they get for bringing religion into their way of thinking.