Coalition Proposal. Opposition

Liberial Democrat, Anarchist, AR Party


I propose the begining of a Coalition

Matt, Leche? What do you say?
if any other parties feek they are under represented by the Big Red Dog I will love it.


AR Party votes yes... They have no choice rawr

Fascists and anarchists?

thats madness

I promote liche, we need greeny and carmen too.

Anarchism, Fascism and social democrat in one party ? lol that will be a party in intern conflict

First of all you spell it "Liche" Diogritor.
2nd, Authoritarians and Anarchists in one party????

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

First of all you spell it "Liche" Diogritor.
2nd, Authoritarians and Anarchists in one party????

Y not?

mattabesta wrote:

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

First of all you spell it "Liche" Diogritor.
2nd, Authoritarians and Anarchists in one party????

Y not?

I think in this case opposites do not attract.

mononokifool wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

First of all you spell it "Liche" Diogritor.
2nd, Authoritarians and Anarchists in one party????

Y not?

I think in this case opposites do not attract.

why are they oppisti?

Opposites attract. N to S. Men to Woman(usually).

Anyways yes, there is a new Coaliton, with me as the leader. If you are a chairman of a party and want to combine votes, then post here or message me. And for the millonth time, I'm more Syndacalist then anarchist.

Liche wrote:

I'm more Syndacalist then anarchist.

Then you're closer to the left wing(communists/socialists).

Liche wrote:

Opposites attract. N to S. Men to Woman(usually).

Anyways yes, there is a new Coaliton, with me as the leader. If you are a chairman of a party and want to combine votes, then post here or message me. And for the millonth time, I'm more Syndacalist then anarchist.

We have a common goal then. liberate the workers

mononokifool wrote:

Liche wrote:

Opposites attract. N to S. Men to Woman(usually).

Anyways yes, there is a new Coaliton, with me as the leader. If you are a chairman of a party and want to combine votes, then post here or message me. And for the millonth time, I'm more Syndacalist then anarchist.

We have a common goal then. liberate the workers

but you want the goverment to monitor evry move the worker makes.

mattabesta wrote:

but you want the goverment to monitor evry move the worker makes.

That's fascism, not communism. Communists don't support that.

Riddler wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

but you want the goverment to monitor evry move the worker makes.

That's fascism, not communism. Communists don't support that.

so they don't own the entier econamy?

mattabesta wrote:

Riddler wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

but you want the goverment to monitor evry move the worker makes.

That's fascism, not communism. Communists don't support that.

so they don't own the entier econamy?

The state owns it yes, but it doesn't limits workers' freedomé

Riddler wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

Riddler wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

but you want the goverment to monitor evry move the worker makes.

That's fascism, not communism. Communists don't support that.

so they don't own the entier econamy?

The state owns it yes, but it doesn't limits workers' freedomé

so you can qit and be unemployed?

mattabesta wrote:

Riddler wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

Riddler wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

but you want the goverment to monitor evry move the worker makes.

That's fascism, not communism. Communists don't support that.

so they don't own the entier econamy?

The state owns it yes, but it doesn't limits workers' freedomé

so you can qit and be unemployed?

Yes, but then you will be looked down upon by society

mononokifool wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

Riddler wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

Riddler wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

but you want the goverment to monitor evry move the worker makes.

That's fascism, not communism. Communists don't support that.

so they don't own the entier econamy?

The state owns it yes, but it doesn't limits workers' freedomé

so you can qit and be unemployed?

Yes, but then you will be looked down upon by society

but I can still get a free mp3 right?

mattabesta wrote:

mononokifool wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

Riddler wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

Riddler wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

but you want the goverment to monitor evry move the worker makes.

That's fascism, not communism. Communists don't support that.

so they don't own the entier econamy?

The state owns it yes, but it doesn't limits workers' freedomé

so you can qit and be unemployed?

Yes, but then you will be looked down upon by society

but I can still get a free mp3 right?

Yes...

Communists are horrible at copyright. Here in China they have full sites with hundreds of programs freely downloadable AND serial numbers for free, even though these programs are mostly US American and should be properly bought.


PS: Remember, if you download music ilegally, you support COMMUNISM!

Quote :

so you can qit and be unemployed?

Yes. The only differences between a liberal government and a socialist government are:
1 Socialist government is run by the workers instead of the capitalists.
2 Socialist government is run more democratically.
3 Socialist government owns the means of production.

Quote :

Anyways yes, there is a new Coaliton, with me as the leader.

Wait, does that mean you actually went for this? This is a ridiculous proposal. Even a coalition between liberal democrats and the anarchists is absurd, but the authoritarian right? That's unbelievable.

Pannekoek wrote:

Quote :

so you can qit and be unemployed?

Yes. The only differences between a liberal government and a socialist government are:
1 Socialist government is run by the workers instead of the capitalists.
2 Socialist government is run more democratically.
3 Socialist government owns the means of production.

ummm, democracy was created to shut the peple up.
I don´t like number 1 and 3

mattabesta wrote:

Pannekoek wrote:

Quote :

so you can qit and be unemployed?

Yes. The only differences between a liberal government and a socialist government are:
1 Socialist government is run by the workers instead of the capitalists.
2 Socialist government is run more democratically.
3 Socialist government owns the means of production.

ummm, democracy was created to shut the peple up.
I don´t like number 1 and 3

Democracy is like freedom, you either have it or you don't. That said, democracy doesn't really exist in reality, just theory.

Why don't you like number one? If everyone will, soon after socialism, become a worker in some respect, why wouldn't it follow that workers run the society (democracy)?

NoJustice.NoPeace wrote:

mattabesta wrote:

Pannekoek wrote:

Quote :

so you can qit and be unemployed?

Yes. The only differences between a liberal government and a socialist government are:
1 Socialist government is run by the workers instead of the capitalists.
2 Socialist government is run more democratically.
3 Socialist government owns the means of production.

ummm, democracy was created to shut the peple up.
I don´t like number 1 and 3

Democracy is like freedom, you either have it or you don't. That said, democracy doesn't really exist in reality, just theory.

Why don't you like number one? If everyone will, soon after socialism, become a worker in some respect, why wouldn't it follow that workers run the society (democracy)?

well workers are 13% of the society so it isn't democracy