Who thinks i'd be a good cop?

I hate this crap justice system. People basically get away with smoking pot. See if anyone smokes even a little bit, i'd beat the shit out them.

that's what i'm going to do. i'm going to be a police officer and make the place safer.

so do you think i'd be a good cop, or do you sympathize with murder loving, lack of morals, terrorist sympathizing scum?

Calinis... you suck?! what's wrong with people smoking pot? at long as they don't hurt anyone (phisically) who gives a shit?

calinis wrote:

I hate this crap justice system. People basically get away with smoking pot. See if anyone smokes even a little bit, i'd beat the shit out them.

that's what i'm going to do. i'm going to be a police officer and make the place safer.

so do you think i'd be a good cop, or do you sympathize with murder loving, lack of morals, terrorist sympathizing scum?

I await the piles of police brutality filings with earnest glee.

I must sense that this post was made of anger, so anger management would be an issue, as police brutality is always something that needs to be watched for.

I said maybe, just because I can imagine you as (a less cool version) of Magnum PI.

wtf lack of moral?
So people who smoke shit lack moral?
That's not true what the hell?

If they do it in a room or something and then just be regluar person they don't hurt someone.

Also do you live in US or in Canada?
Cause US jutice system = uber crap.


You can fucking sue ANYONE for no reason!!
And there's a jury... A JURY!

You have more chance of winning if your a cute "innocent" girl then an old grandpa or so.

Fucking bombs, US sux.

But that's off-topic.

Also, if people want to smoke sh!t and maybe fuck up there lives, fine there lives not yours!

I think it is too extreme to beat them. At this point I think you would be too brutal to be a good cop. Maybe in 5 years your views might change and you might have the potential to be a good cop.

Since you're the opposite of righteousness, you'd be an awesome cop.

A good cop? What?

Stos wrote:

A good cop? What?

Subjectivity Stos, subjectivity.

Kenzu wrote:

I think it is too extreme to beat them. At this point I think you would be too brutal to be a good cop. Maybe in 5 years your views might change and you might have the potential to be a good cop.

stop it your views aren't superior to his nor is your intellect.

CoolKidX wrote:

And there's a jury... A JURY!

Could you explain your problem with juries?

mattabesta wrote:

stop it your views aren't superior to his

A person's views cannot be superior to anything, nor inferior. It looks like you're just criticizing him for giving his opinion.

MightyObserver wrote:

Could you explain your problem with juries?

i believe he means that the jury can just look at the subject on a subjective way, so if its a little quit aryan girl and a big negro man that are subjecteded then the jury would proberly free the girl, even though it is the girl that is the massmurder!! just because they believe it.

Dude, seriously, DID someone who did drugs do something to you? I've asked you this many times.

I think hes just dwelling on the common stereotype that Drug Users are more likely to commit crimes, which where most people on the site look at the opposite stereotype that people on drugs (especially marijuana) wouldn't do anything bad because of their trance state of mind. But in my opinion, different people are affected different ways by the same substance.

Liche wrote:

I think hes just dwelling on the common stereotype that Drug Users are more likely to commit crimes, which where most people on the site look at the opposite stereotype that people on drugs (especially marijuana) wouldn't do anything bad because of their trance state of mind. But in my opinion, different people are affected different ways by the same substance.

The side opposing calinis is not basing itself on any stereotype. It's a bunch of guys who have either shared their personal experience as drug consumers, have direct contact with drug users even on a daily basis and that count with 1st hand information about drugs. Many of their claims can be backed up by studies.

MightyObserver wrote:

Could you explain your problem with juries?

I will tell you what my problem is with them!
They are corrupt as hell, fi they don't look like it they WILL overchoose a random ass 18 year old cute girl when she is guilty or can win a bull-shit sue case fast cause she's so "inocent" then a old grandpa or so.
Also some just say guilty to get to leave fast.

But face it, America is loaded with these kinda bull-crap sue-cases filled with jury who love to go home early and just say guilty or so.

MightyObserver wrote:

CoolKidX wrote:

And there's a jury... A JURY!

Could you explain your problem with juries?

mattabesta wrote:

stop it your views aren't superior to his

A person's views cannot be superior to anything, nor inferior. It looks like you're just criticizing him for ging his opinion.

ging?

I talked with one of the coolest teachers, Mr.Eisenhauer,(he is the BEST). We were discussing about drugs, and there were many point we made. Here are the ones I remember in this point of time:
We are taught in a basic basic Black and White angle, rather than more of a philsophical point of view. In school, it would be like " Drugs are bad. Hey but what abou.. Drugs are bad. But wait.. No, drugs are bad." Drugs don't alter people's personalitys, and there are long long term effects with anything, cheese, soy milk, anything. It is also a waste of resources, having police chase down some randm guy sitting in his house, calmly smoking pot while the guy nextdoor is smoking niccotine and getting hangovers. Many people in Pakistan and such try to afford milk and rice everyday by workin in fields making at least a little a day, and then having cops or the US coming and cutting the fields down. You can have no, if not minimal effects by doing drugs a little each day, as long as its a little, and people should be able to decide for themselves what they want to do, and howmuch they want to take, instead of being shot and knived over drugs that could easily be legalized and made readily avaliable. I talked to my dad about this, he does not disagree with me, but he did have some good points I had no answer for. 1. They have already legalied drugs, Niccotine and alcohol, which are not short of drugs. I said to this, well, why not leagalize more or ban all? He said because these have less of an impact on the brain and things. I remind you, the reader that he agrees with me, but he just asked these questions.

P.S. I do not do drugs.

Apparently only myself and one other (since the third person who voted 'yes' was probably calinis) thought this through thoroughly.

Fuck ya you'd be a good cop calinis! You'd make a great cop. Moral, reactionary, full of anger, patronizing, arrogant, with a will to extreme violence; seems to me you fit the profile. You're commanding officers will be glad to have you.

Black_Cross wrote:

Apparently only myself and one other (since the third person who voted 'yes' was probably calinis) thought this through thoroughly.

Fuck ya you'd be a good cop calinis! You'd make a great cop. Moral, reactionary, full of anger, patronizing, arrogant, with a will to extreme violence; seems to me you fit the profile. You're commanding officers will be glad to have you.

Except for the fact this isn't a 60's peace rally, or a video game.

Black_Cross wrote:

Fuck ya you'd be a good cop calinis! You'd make a great cop. Moral, reactionary, full of anger, patronizing, arrogant, with a will to extreme violence; seems to me you fit the profile. You're commanding officers will be glad to have you.

Don't generalize all cops as this. Their will be the good and the bad folks in every job area/field. I don't know were you live, but im sorry to hear that you portray a entire field as "arrogant and with a will to extreme violence"

Rename wrote:

Don't generalize all cops as this. Their will be the good and the bad folks in every job area/field. I don't know were you live, but im sorry to hear that you portray a entire field as "arrogant and with a will to extreme violence"

I'd just criticize a cop that is aware that he is hardly even part of the problems' solution and still thinks his job is awesome.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Rename wrote:

Don't generalize all cops as this. Their will be the good and the bad folks in every job area/field. I don't know were you live, but im sorry to hear that you portray a entire field as "arrogant and with a will to extreme violence"

I'd just criticize a cop that is aware that he is hardly even part of the problems' solution and still thinks his job is awesome.

Most Cops back here only give tickets for speeding. LoL Long live to Canada

Jesus wrote:

Most Cops back here only give tickets for speeding. LoL Long live to Canada

The cops were i live are actually helpful and friendly.