PermaBan calinis?

you dont changed shit man, you know why you were banned and why you will be banned again, you said about 5 times thats all i have changed but fuck no! why we should trust you again

why you just don't get the fuck out?

calinis wrote:

Quote :

No, but i know the type of person you are, and i know what kind of person zach is, and i'll take his word over yours on any given day.

You do know zach hated me way before that (for no reason) and said that I deserved to die. So what kind of person is he, then?

Before that you were still babbling on about killing everyone who uses drugs. So that hardly surprises me that zach hated you, even though he doesn't take drugs. I'm sure he had other reasons as well.

Quote :

The thing is that Speznas' comment was "ban, what ever" as if he didn't really care about it, but had the power to vote, so just decided to simply for that reason. Just because he can vote doesn't mean he should. Why vote for something you dont have an opinion about just because you can?

Maybe cos it's funny as shit? And the hypocracy is on Kenzu, not you (at least in this instance).

And really, how much of a difference is there between someone votes out of apathy, and someone who votes out of ignorance?

Quote :

Because she has an opinion other than yours?

That's Kenzu's fiancee(?).

Quote :

why you just don't get the fuck out?

Your comments are more offensive than mine and nobody is threatening to ban you. How does me being on this site effect you, really?

Quote :

Before that you were still babbling on about killing everyone who uses drugs. So that hardly surprises me that zach hated you, even though he doesn't take drugs. I'm sure he had other reasons as well.

No he always just hated me. He wished death on me even before i said anything (apparently) insulting to him.

Quote :

And really, how much of a difference is there between someone votes out of apathy, and someone who votes out of ignorance?

Who's voting out of ignorance here? Look at all my recent comments and you'll see that speaks for itself.

I DISAGREE

He has improved greatly.

yes- 12

idk-1

no-11

Oh its getting hot out here!

EDIT: Never mind.

This is an epic mock at all of you.

IVE changed my mind. calinis u vote no. because u said to me i was gay.

Kenzu wrote:

Speznas wrote:

ban, what ever

Why? You are new, how can you judge about someone when you came only 2 days ago?

i see how people talks about him, and wannt him out, so i will support them to get him out

Speznas wrote:

Kenzu wrote:

Speznas wrote:

ban, what ever

Why? You are new, how can you judge about someone when you came only 2 days ago?

i see how people talks about him, and wannt him out, so i will support them to get him out

I think Speznas just his good insight.

calinis wrote:

Quote :

why you just don't get the fuck out?

Your comments are more offensive than mine and nobody is threatening to ban you. How does me being on this site effect you, really?

I haven't told anyone that i want to kill them. I haven't told anyone that i'm glad members of their family are dead. I have not condoned genocide.

Maybe that's why people don't wanna ban me. Could be wrong though.

Quote :

No he always just hated me. He wished death on me even before i said anything (apparently) insulting to him.

Then supply the link to one of his posts proving this.

Quote :

Who's voting out of ignorance here? Look at all my recent comments and you'll see that speaks for itself.

No, it really doesn't. You still believe all drug users ought to be killed?

And comrade is the one voting out of ignorance. I only made reference to him because Kenzu, the hypocrite that he is, decided to single out Speznas for voting without caring. comrade couldn't possibly care any more, or be any more informed.

Black_Cross wrote:

I haven't told anyone that i want to kill them. I haven't told anyone that i'm glad members of their family are dead. I have not condoned genocide.

Maybe that's why people don't wanna ban me. Could be wrong though.

When you are Anarchist you Representate a society that wants everybody dead, and cars burning in the streets.
that means that you actually are telling us that you want our familyes dead, and that you want to kill us. by simply representating the imoral anarchist party.

Quote :

IVE changed my mind. calinis u vote no. because u said to me i was gay.

I never said that. What the hell...?

Quote :

I haven't told anyone that i want to kill them. I haven't told anyone that i'm glad members of their family are dead. I have not condoned genocide.

Maybe that's why people don't wanna ban me. Could be wrong though.

I wasn't talking to you. I was talking to redsoviet obviously, in case you couldn't tell. Likewise I never told anyone that I wanted to kill them, said that I was glad their family members are dead, or condoned genocide.

Quote :

Then supply the link to one of his posts proving this.

Cant find it now. I will search later.

Quote :

No, it really doesn't. You still believe all drug users ought to be killed?

yes because all drug users are scum who enjoy harming society as a collective unit and the individuals in it. I just dont like killing innocent people that much, but that's just me. Also if you're dead, you dont have to deal with your shit life anymore. Yay?

Quote :

And comrade is the one voting out of ignorance. I only made reference to him because Kenzu, the hypocrite that he is, decided to single out Speznas for voting without caring. comrade couldn't possibly care any more, or be any more informed.

How do you know he's voting out of ignorance? You do realize that he could have read my other threads and informed himself on the matter. Speznas, however, indicated that he didn't care by saying "ban, whatever". If he had said "I think he should be banned because....", then it would have been more valid.

Tyrlop wrote:

When you are Anarchist you Representate a society that wants everybody dead, and cars burning in the streets.
that means that you actually are telling us that you want our familyes dead, and that you want to kill us. by simply representating the imoral anarchist party.

You're making a statement out of mere ignorance something that utterly nullifies it. Get informed about anarchism and then talk, would you?

calinis wrote:

I wasn't talking to you. I was talking to redsoviet obviously, in case you couldn't tell. Likewise I never told anyone that I wanted to kill them, said that I was glad their family members are dead,

You told Zach you were glad his brother died for he deserved it being the immoral homosexual he was.

calinis wrote:

or condoned genocide.

Underlined green text above and quoted text disproven by the next:

calinis wrote:

Black_Cross wrote:

No, it really doesn't. You still believe all drug users ought to be killed?

yes because all drug users are scum who enjoy harming society as a collective unit and the individuals in it. I just dont like killing innocent people that much, but that's just me. Also if you're dead, you dont have to deal with your shit life anymore. Yay?

1. You do support genocide then, that is you support the annihiliation of the entire drug consuming population.
2. No, drug users do not harm society and much less intend to do so by consuming drugs. If Black_Cross smokes some weed in his home it has absolutely no impact on your life, if a man 2 miles away from you sniffs Jenkem it has no repercussion in your life.
3. People don't consume drugs just because they have a shit life. They can consume them for several resons: mere pleasure, mere fun, as a medicinal resource or as part of cultural practices.

So you're not so into killing innocent people? Just a little, right?

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Tyrlop wrote:

When you are Anarchist you Representate a society that wants everybody dead, and cars burning in the streets.
that means that you actually are telling us that you want our familyes dead, and that you want to kill us. by simply representating the imoral anarchist party.

You're making a statement out of mere ignorance something that utterly nullifies it. Get informed about anarchism and then talk, would you?

I Know exactly everything about Anarchism, ive seen it grove, its like a evil mushroom!
Anarchism is a mix between Imorality, populism, revolution-Romantic and psycotaism and Uniquens onslaughter.

Quote :

You told Zach you were glad his brother died for he deserved it being the immoral homosexual he was.

Prove it.

Quote :

1. You do support genocide then, that is you support the annihiliation of the entire drug consuming population.

Would supporting the death penalty be condoning genocide by eliminating scum? If that's genocide, I dont give a damn. I dont support genocide of innocent people, though.

Quote :

2. No, drug users do not harm society and much less intend to do so by consuming drugs. If Black_Cross smokes some weed in his home it has absolutely no impact on your life, if a man 2 miles away from you sniffs Jenkem it has no repercussion in your life.

Yes because drugs decrease your mental state making you more prone to doing stupid things, like driving your car impaired and killing someone.

Quote :

3. People don't consume drugs just because they have a shit life. They can consume them for several resons: mere pleasure, mere fun, as a medicinal resource or as part of cultural practices.

Then those people are even more pathetic.

Quote :

So you're not so into killing innocent people? Just a little, right?

Not at all.

Why are we even debating this? He isn't doing any harm anymore. He's behaving better than the average member now, if you ask me. There is simply no reason to ban him.

MightyObserver wrote:

Why are we even debating this? He isn't doing any harm anymore. He's behaving better than the average member now, if you ask me. There is simply no reason to ban him.

ive changed my mind again! NO dont ban him! FREE THE CALANIS

Hes about to get banned. But ONE person can save him, but they must step up (if they feel like it )

Liche wrote:

Hes about to get banned. But ONE person can save him, but they must step up (if they feel like it )

One poll, One man, is needed, for the final....decision!

*comeing around a week or so*

calinis wrote:

Prove it.

Liche (who doesn't give a fuck anymore), Zach, Alek and I saw you doing that. The only way to prove it would have been by saving the chat. However, what you told me via PM is god enough evidence that you're actually capable of doing such things.

calinis wrote:

Would supporting the death penalty be condoning genocide by eliminating scum? If that's genocide, I dont give a damn. I dont support genocide of innocent people, though.

You're not supporting death penalty against people for causing troubles to society but simply for an activity which only has impact over their lives. It's like killing all those that don't drink coffee in the morning.

calinis wrote:

Yes because drugs decrease your mental state making you more prone to doing stupid things, like driving your car impaired and killing someone.

The simple fact that the majority of these actions are perfomed by people who are not under the influence of drugs and that it's not a majority of the drug consuming population who performs this, your arguement is invalid.

calinis wrote:

Then those people are even more pathetic.

That's of course just an opinion, not an objective arguement. Also, it's a stupid opinion.

calinis wrote:

Not at all.

Since you approve of killing people just for consuming drugs, an activity that doesn't harm anyone but the consumer and that if in excess, you support killing innocent people.


Tyrlop, what crimethink defines as Anarchism is not anarchism.

As for the ban on calinis, Only well founded arguements should count. This guy is still trolling and is denying to have commited what he did commit.

ive changed my mind again. thanks for clearing that up!

i disagree
he has improved
i mean look at me, i have changed and i used to be the spammiest guy around
he deserves another chanve

enviro wrote:

i disagree
he has improved
i mean look at me, i have changed and i used to be the spammiest guy around
he deserves another chanve

ttly, ive changed my mind again! he needs a second chance!

enviro wrote:

i disagree
he has improved
i mean look at me, i have changed and i used to be the spammiest guy around
he deserves another chanve

You were not half as spammy as watemelon or mattabesta. Else, you never engaged in personal attacks against anybody.

Calinis keeps trolling and spamming and denies what he did.