Hello.

There many black people proud to be black..

Im proud to be white..sounds racist?

Anyways, Sill has being reasonable so no curseing.

CoolKidX wrote:

There many black people proud to be black..

Im proud to be white..sounds racist?

Stupid, yeah. Racist? Well, it does kinda imply that being born with a white skin colour is somehow worth being proud of, and thusly superior to being born at least one other colour, but I'm just going to accept it as trying to make up for a lack of actual achievments for you to be proud of.

I'm just glad I was born who I am in all the extension of what and who I am.

Quote :

I'm just glad I was born who I am in all the extension of what and who I am.

Good view. You can be pround of yourself without necessary being racist or anything else. There's a difference.

Hoxhaist wrote:

for those of you who dinna udnerstand, he believes that the races shoudl separate and white pepul should only live wit otter white pepul and etc.

aka, he a racit nazi GTFO

If that's all he thinks then he's merely a segregationist.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Hoxhaist wrote:

for those of you who dinna udnerstand, he believes that the races shoudl separate and white pepul should only live wit otter white pepul and etc.

aka, he a racit nazi GTFO

If that's all he thinks then he's merely a segregationist.

Merely?

Stos wrote:

Merely?

Yes, he could go much farther.

He could, perhaps, but remember, this is advocation of splitting everybody up by race. It's not an especially minor act.

Stos wrote:

He could, perhaps, but remember, this is advocation of splitting everybody up by race. It's not an especially minor act.

Of course not but what if he thinks this way:

"All races are equally valuable, but they shouldn't mix with each other". That is not racist per say, does not advocate for destruction of any race and does not claim any race to be superior. It doesn't advocate for world conquest and slavery of peoples.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Stos wrote:

He could, perhaps, but remember, this is advocation of splitting everybody up by race. It's not an especially minor act.

Of course not but what if he thinks this way:

"All races are equally valuable, but they shouldn't mix with each other". That is not racist per say, does not advocate for destruction of any race and does not claim any race to be superior. It doesn't advocate for world conquest and slavery of peoples.

I kind of agree with that.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Of course not but what if he thinks this way:

"All races are equally valuable, but they shouldn't mix with each other". That is not racist per say, does not advocate for destruction of any race and does not claim any race to be superior. It doesn't advocate for world conquest and slavery of peoples.

They shouldn't mix to preserve culture, other than that, you got my main ideas down

Are you German?

Sill wrote:

They shouldn't mix to preserve culture, other than that, you got my main ideas down

Which makes you a segregationist, not a nazi.

Zealot_Kommunizma wrote:

Sill wrote:

They shouldn't mix to preserve culture, other than that, you got my main ideas down

Which makes you a segregationist, not a nazi.

Reasonable Conclusion

segregationist is a harsh word tough. it imposes that other races shouldn't mix in any way. I just do think fanatical zealots and islamic prostitutes should mix (lol). But seriously, I wouldn't call this segregation.

Alek4A wrote:

Are you German?

ya and i am a nazi, not that segregationist thing you said because of my views on zionism and its attempt to control...everything

so i dont have to get hammered ill say it now(ill get hammered anyway), i dont want to kill teh zionists but i am extremist toward them

This thread is so full of self-contradiction, it makes me wanna do bad things to myself. How has this thread not collapsed in on itself like a dying star? This guy's trying to compare nazism with socialism; f**k that.

Anarchist.Dagger wrote:

This thread is so full of self-contradiction, it makes me wanna do bad things to myself. How has this thread not collapsed in on itself like a dying star? This guy's trying to compare nazism with socialism; f**k that.

nazism is national socialism just a fancy word, look it up. nazism emplys type of socialism other than just the regular "communistic socialism" or other. Socialism is not just for lefties, socialism can even apply to capitalism.

Anarchist.Dagger wrote:

This thread is so full of self-contradiction, it makes me wanna do bad things to myself. How has this thread not collapsed in on itself like a dying star? This guy's trying to compare nazism with socialism; f**k that.

It actually was Socialism technically. Just not our kind of socialism.


Basically its socialism so extreme that it is no where close to it. The original founder was an anarchist. anarcho-syndicalist to be exact.

Fascism actually doesn't have to be authoritarian. Some people would probably call my beliefs fascist.

Liche wrote:

It actually was Socialism technically. Just not our kind of socialism.


Basically its socialism so extreme that it is no where close to it. The original founder was an anarchist. anarcho-syndicalist to be exact.

Fascism actually doesn't have to be authoritarian. Some people would probably call my beliefs fascist.

i agree but i think fascism has to be authoritarian.

Technically, but it wasn't meant to be that way is what I am saying.

Liche wrote:

Technically, but it wasn't meant to be that way is what I am saying.

oh well i have question for anarchist buddy
has anarchism ever like worked anywere? i havent really studied anarchism that much i just know its pretty much no government no officials no laws etc right?

nationalsocialism where a bit socialistsic before 1933 but hitler chosed to cut he socialistic part out to win the voters of the conservative party and to let hindenburg accept him.

Tyrlop wrote:

nationalsocialism where a bit socialistsic before 1933 but hitler chosed to cut he socialistic part out to win the voters of the conservative party and to let hindenburg accept him.

his economy was socialistic and had supporters of the people that loved being seperated. The Germans followed him to the end obviously, and thats why alot of the stuff you hear "The germans denied Hitler killed them" came about.

He cut out socialism for his victims, though

well there where socialism in his politics he removed the labour unions and replaced them with Arbeits Front, but the only things the Arbeits Front where to hire clowns and actors to act for the workers, the Arbeits Front worked as pro-propoganda tool, i think it was the Arbeitsfront who build the autobahn.
well he needed socialism to get the people, people had been starving, and germany was still pour, but nationalsocialism is the opposite of Socialism, it was created like fascism to fight Communism (socialism) and jews.

yea that might be true he cut the socialism for his victims, like the retards and jews. have u seen the movie called : der untermensch?