Hello.

Nazism's "socialisticity" is based on a ridiculous misconception of Socialism, which makes it non-socialist.

anarcho-syndicalism has worked in Spain and ancient Africa.

and yes Zealot, that was exactly what I was saying.

Sill wrote:

oh well i have question for anarchist buddy
has anarchism ever like worked anywere? i havent really studied anarchism that much i just know its pretty much no government no officials no laws etc right?

Yes. There are still anarchist collectives in Spain, and some in Mexico. And i remember even hearing about something like this in the US (I wanna say Rhode Island, but don't take my word for it). Then there were some hippies in denmark who occupied a military barracks and declared the city free (though the most anarchist thing about that place was the fact that they sold weed out in the open). The hippie community still exists, though i don't know the state of it, nor do i know if they've made any real attempts at, what i would call, true anarchism. Then there was parts of Ireland for about a millenium, and also parts of Iceland. But i suppose one of the better examples is the Whiteway colony (you can look it up).

Anarchist.Dagger wrote:

Sill wrote:

oh well i have question for anarchist buddy
has anarchism ever like worked anywere? i havent really studied anarchism that much i just know its pretty much no government no officials no laws etc right?

Yes. There are still anarchist collectives in Spain, and some in Mexico. i think all Ukraine's anarchist sympathies died in 1921, but they were anarchist for a few short years. And i remember even hearing about something like this in the US (I wanna say Rhode Island, but don't take my word for it). Then there were some hippies in denmark who occupied a military barracks and declared the city free (though the most anarchist thing about that place was the fact that they sold weed out in the open). The hippie community still exists, though i don't know the state of it, nor do i know if they've made any real attempts at, what i would call, true anarchism. Then there was parts of Ireland for about a century, and also parts of Iceland. But i suppose one of the better examples is the Whiteway colony (you can look it up).

YEA I LIVE less then 20 meters away from it! its paradise i tell you paradise!
Christiania, but the government want to take it over i think in 20 years its gone, but we are fighting! u should come and visit this place its wonderfull!
LONG LIVE CHRISTIANIA

When I turn 18 I will come, you can show me around Tyrlrop.

Tyrlop wrote:

YEA I LIVE less then 20 meters away from it! its paradise i tell you paradise!
Christiania, but the government want to take it over i think in 20 years its gone, but we are fighting! u should come and visit this place its wonderfull!
LONG LIVE CHRISTIANIA

Tight.

Well, considering my economic situation, it's unlikely. But if i can get myself a decent job after college and get out of debt, i may make an effort to visit (and if they were really threatened by the government, i think the situation could get interesting, so i'd increase my efforts). But i really do want to end up in the UK, so if i made it there, getting to denmark may not be so much of a stretch.

anybody know of anarchist collectives in holland im going there next summer

paris commune worked.

Sill wrote:

Liche wrote:

Technically, but it wasn't meant to be that way is what I am saying.

oh well i have question for anarchist buddy
has anarchism ever like worked anywere? i havent really studied anarchism that much i just know its pretty much no government no officials no laws etc right?

do some research man. it's worked on countless occasions and ill tell you this, no anarchist society ever practiced racial cleansing either

Alek4A wrote:

do some research man. it's worked on countless occasions and ill tell you this, no anarchist society ever practiced racial cleansing either

i know that much, but i was just wondering

Sill wrote:

Alek4A wrote:

do some research man. it's worked on countless occasions and ill tell you this, no anarchist society ever practiced racial cleansing either

i know that much, but i was just wondering

ya so get the buttfuck outta my forum kid.

mononokifool wrote:

paris commune worked.

Not really. It was destined to be destroyed eventually. It was great while it lasted, however.

Stos wrote:

Not really. It was destined to be destroyed eventually. It was great while it lasted, however.

That's what mononki said, it worked. The fact that it was destroyed doesn't mean it didn't work.

hillarious. the exit. well its not rly anarchist becaus they pay taxes and they also pay water and electricity. and there are much police atm guarding around. but its long story. its still the nicest place

sill what should be done with the jews? also what do you think of the holocaust? were there not extreme enough methods? or do you deny it ever happening? that's a load of crap.

so please do not dodge my questions. i would like answers to all of them please.

ps i thought nazism was illegal in germany.

beatnikzach wrote:

Sill wrote:

Alek4A wrote:

do some research man. it's worked on countless occasions and ill tell you this, no anarchist society ever practiced racial cleansing either

i know that much, but i was just wondering

ya so get the buttfuck outta my forum kid.

pwned

calinis wrote:

sill what should be done with the jews? also what do you think of the holocaust? were there not extreme enough methods? or do you deny it ever happening? that's a load of crap.

so please do not dodge my questions. i would like answers to all of them please.

ps i thought nazism was illegal in germany.

nothing wrong with jews, im talking about zionists, i dont think they should be killed but they should be thrown out of the offices and punished.
holocaust was pointless. hitler was too extreme. but it was needed at the time to help germany and the places surrounding germany.

that doesnt mean i support/admire hitler killing people, but i still have respect for him, he had a hard job, much like stalin. both stalins and hitlers death tolls (millions) were waaay exageratted though

no i dont deny it...but my ancestors did

beatnikzach wrote:

ya so get the buttfuck outta my forum kid.

cant accept people have different opinons and ideals? sad..

what a moron you have respect for a man who killed 6 million?

it was not needed to kill people. nope not at all. dont even try justifying it.

you say there is nothing wrong with the jews, but you lie. you hate them, because thats the premise of nazism.

calinis wrote:

what a moron you have respect for a man who killed 6 million?

it was not needed to kill people. nope not at all. dont even try justifying it.

you say there is nothing wrong with the jews, but you lie. you hate them, because thats the premise of nazism.

he helped germany and the surrounding countries survive a huge depression. yes i respect him. do i agree with his ways of doing this? no.

again i never said i supported him killing them dumbfuck

and yet again, i dont hate jews-jews. i hate zionists. but i still dont think they should be killed.

omg he helped preserve the economy at the expense of 6 mill people. oh that's always right. you respect him? tell that to the face of a holocaust surviver, tell them that you respect the man who put them through that mess.

and yes nazis beliving killing jews is neccessary.

calinis wrote:

omg he helped preserve the economy at the expense of 6 mill people. oh that's always right. you respect him? tell that to the face of a holocaust surviver, tell them that you respect the man who put them through that mess.

and yes nazis beliving killing jews is neccessary.

im not going to repeat my meaning 50 times. maybe you should re-read what i wrote and see that i think he was needed but i still think hes evil.

no....again...

how can you say he was needed when his overall impact was negative? does the small, miniscule good things he did make up for starting the greatest war ever and placing millions of "undesirables" through the most horrific and inhumane event ever?

yes that is waht nazism is. following the principles of hitler in his movememnt. that's what its about.

go to other post

Sill wrote:

calinis wrote:

sill what should be done with the jews? also what do you think of the holocaust? were there not extreme enough methods? or do you deny it ever happening? that's a load of crap.

so please do not dodge my questions. i would like answers to all of them please.

ps i thought nazism was illegal in germany.

nothing wrong with jews, im talking about zionists, i dont think they should be killed but they should be thrown out of the offices and punished.
holocaust was pointless. hitler was too extreme. but it was needed at the time to help germany and the places surrounding germany.

that doesnt mean i support/admire hitler killing people, but i still have respect for him, he had a hard job, much like stalin. both stalins and hitlers death tolls (millions) were waaay exageratted though

no i dont deny it...but my ancestors did

beatnikzach wrote:

ya so get the buttfuck outta my forum kid.

cant accept people have different opinons and ideals? sad..

i cant accept someone who respects people who killed my family.
you should have a look at the scoreboard.

beatnikzach wrote:

i cant accept someone who respects people who killed my family.
you should have a look at the scoreboard.

do you respect stalin for helping the ussr but also hate him for killing innocents? (I know many communists do) that is the exact way i feel toward hitler

and what do you mean check scoreboards?